The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Shitlaw boss grows beard for trial, shaves it off if he has a “bad day”
| Insane filthpig | 07/13/26 |
| stirring party of the first part prole | 07/13/26 |
| Insane filthpig | 07/13/26 |
| stirring party of the first part prole | 07/13/26 |
| aphrodisiac brunch | 07/13/26 |
| Insane filthpig | 07/13/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 13th, 2026 2:35 PM Author: Insane filthpig says it gives him a “reset” for the jury.
If he has to clean something up in closing He has used the line “regardless of what the bearded fellow asked the other day” and the jury always laughs and even the judge.
defense counsel objects but there is no legal ground to do so.
He has asked for a continuance mid trial if he uses the trick but needs to do another reset so he can grow it back.
Is this shrewd? |
Date: July 13th, 2026 2:36 PM Author: stirring party of the first part prole This sounds like a great strategy and I bet it would go over bigly with many juries (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882339&forum_id=2�id.#49996901) |
 |
Date: July 13th, 2026 4:43 PM Author: Insane filthpig you have no idea, you need to keep things "fresh" and make it as circus like as possible (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882339&forum_id=2�id.#49997182) |
|
Date: July 13th, 2026 4:59 PM Author: stirring party of the first part prole I’m imagining the look of pained exasperation on the face of ins def opposing counsel (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882339&forum_id=2�id.#49997206) |
|
Date: July 13th, 2026 5:00 PM Author: aphrodisiac brunch 180 strategy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882339&forum_id=2�id.#49997211) |
|
Date: July 13th, 2026 5:04 PM Author: Insane filthpig he gets overruled all the time (this is 100% true).
he was overruled 22 times in 20 minutes recently for asking wildly leading questions on direct.
he basically makes up stories on cross and ends with "isn't that right?"
it was honestly embarassing for me bc it was a fed court case. I told him that we should do a CLE on the rules of evidence and he said "you can review the rules of evidence, I'll review the 48 laws of power" |