\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Humphrey’s Executor joining Barbaro and Roe v. Wade in hell

big win for Trump! Kagan is all like, "wtf you overrule...
Pink supple abode
  05/22/25
[taps mic. clears throat. does fake cough.] is this sti...
Pink supple abode
  05/22/25
...
Pink supple abode
  12/08/25
Next up, 13th Amendment!
flickering laughsome church building travel guidebook
  12/09/25
...
impressive degenerate puppy
  12/09/25
Congress needs experts to run the executive branch, we are t...
Pink supple abode
  12/09/25
the cons have the right position on this, but i think this i...
Boyish associate selfie
  12/09/25
also, that headline is misleading, i think. i don't think ja...
Boyish associate selfie
  12/09/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:08 PM
Author: Pink supple abode

big win for Trump! Kagan is all like, "wtf you overrule HE without mentioning it and just pull the plug?"

https://x.com/WilliamBaude/status/1925671526390444089

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#48954985)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 22nd, 2025 8:42 PM
Author: Pink supple abode

[taps mic. clears throat. does fake cough.]

is this still a law bort? c'mon, man, Humphrey's Executor just bit the dust.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#48955022)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:04 PM
Author: Pink supple abode



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49495612)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 5:58 AM
Author: flickering laughsome church building travel guidebook

Next up, 13th Amendment!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49495893)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 8:41 AM
Author: impressive degenerate puppy



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49496020)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: Pink supple abode

Congress needs experts to run the executive branch, we are told.

https://x.com/amuse/status/1998123030917341316

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49496212)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 10:52 AM
Author: Boyish associate selfie

the cons have the right position on this, but i think this is going to wind up being a chaotic disaster. practically speaking, these phd dorks are the experts to whom (in many cases) we should probably defer, although i think the solution for that is going to be to gut federal agencies and minimize the power they have.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49496287)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 10:55 AM
Author: Boyish associate selfie

also, that headline is misleading, i think. i don't think jackson was saying the president should have NO power to fire agency heads, just that the "for cause" removal protections should be upheld.

the answer to the question she poses, though, is obviously that if the president is putting people in positions who know nothing, that's the senate's job to prevent that (which they clearly haven't done if you look at trump's nominees but that's a different issue altogether).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5728986&forum_id=2#49496297)