you don't fight disenfranchisement with disenfranchisement, dumbasses, you fight it with representative democracy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49948584)

There is a reason that people forming teams based on politics and race and ethnicity thrive (Jessie Jackson, Al Sharpton, etc.), while those who transition into forming a broader coalition without clear racial and ethnic and political divisions (MLK, RFK, Huey Long, late stage Malcom X, etc.) quickly get killed

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49948663)

Fred Hampton too. the deep state was fine with him and MLK when they were standing up for black people's rights but when they started forming coalitions with poor people of other races? when Malcolm started speaking up more about oppressed groups around the world? 💥🔫

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49948682)

If he keeps at it and makes any real headway, he'll probably catch a bullet. Would be worth googling him every few years to see if he suddenly dies or becomes a traditional politician. Sell-outs are common

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49948909)

Ron Paul is the only politician I've ever felt that way about. It's been sad to see the country move strongly in his direction too late for it to matter, and with demagogues instead of principled believers

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49949190)

And a good way to ensure this is to make stuff up and distort positions to make sure no principled people can ever go and muck up your thankfulness. You know, let's not talk about the real position like ending the fed and allowing, not requiring, but allowing, states to transact in gold and silver so that the market could decide what is best

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49949472)

the "XYZ only works if everyone looks the same" is a line of argumentation I first encountered around age 12 and it struck me as obviously stupid from the first time I saw it, so I've always associated it with 12 year olds. but I don't understand how he's saying it relates to this thread topic even though he wrote sooooooo many words

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49949480)

Gerrymandering in the United States is a good thing, because it is the product of the white race and American culture taking a stand in favor of self preservation. It is an attempt to hold back the horde of browns, blacks, and orientals who want to make America resemble the things that they're familiar with; the things that appeal to them and their groups. They would do this through political action if their votes aren't sufficiently diluted

Gerrymandering wouldn't be needed if we had a homogeneous society. But we don't. So embrace it, because it's all that is standing between you and non-whiteness

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49949493)

Although I am closely aligned with him ideologically and obviously think his policies would have been beneficial, the important thing to me is having access to politicians one believes in, whatever one's beliefs are and whoever that is

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49949481)

I let Trump's first term lull me into a sense of trust with his stated desire to stay out of wars. Boy was that a mistake

My view is we would be better served if people simply didn't vote unless there was a candidate they genuinely support. Systems don't survive 15% voter turnout for long. It would force change, though probably nothing meaningful. At least not right away. But at least there would be a chance for change

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49949525)

as if it "cancels out" on the national level instead of just compounding the problem

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49948624)

California Republicans post-gerrymandering are anticipated to get like 5/52 House seats, whereas 34% of Californians voted for Trump in 2024. I'm closer to Democrats ideologically than Republicans but imo my Republican-voting compatriots deserve proportional representation. I literally see leftists, even those who don't like the Democrats in general, saying this is totally fine because Republican voters are voting aGaInSt ThEiR bEsT iNtErEsT lmao. as if the Democrats ever deliver for us anyways.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49948973)

What do you do in the face of vehement tribal identity? The only race that actually believes in tolerance of other races are non-Jewish white people. I'm sure there are individuals of other races who agree with Western European humanism and universalism. But the BULK of them do not. They actually believe in doing what's best for them and people like them.

Most jeets for example want a jeet President and they want America to be more like India. That's just the way it is. Jews want more support for Isreal. Blacks want to decriminalize crime because in their culture they believe in street justice and the law of the jungle (not all blacks but just look at the Karmelo Anthony incident where he murdered a white kid for no reason and millions of blacks are pouring out support for this guy because he's 'one of us').

Anyway you cannot simply have a free and fair process when the other side is trying to rig the system. So many Asians and Jeets I went to high school with cheated on SAT, paid a professional to write their application etc. I knew a Jeet who got extra time on tests due to a fake learning disability that was 100% made up. A yuge cheater AZN I grew up with got into Stanford. He thought it was funny that he cheated the system.

The reality is we live in an era of crab bucket mentality with competing interests. Somalis want more fraudulent government aid so they can get paid to do nothing. You think anyone getting massive amounts of free government cheese is just going to be nonchalant about it like oh I guess I don't really care if whites organize and cut me off. No they're going to fight tooth and nail to keep the scam running in their favor. To say nothing of the Jews who literally control society and bend every rule in order to win at all costs.

So yes if we lived in Finland where everybody looks and talks the same we could have a high trust society. In Scandinavia they all revere Socialism and they dance around trees holding hands and singing songs about Marxism because 7/10 people have blonde hair and blue eyes and everyone speaks the same language and you can sing kumbaya and have a party and everyone is in it together.

But WE don't live in that reality. We live in a decaying empire that's being sold off for parts while heritage Americans have had the rug pulled out from underneath them. Gerrymandering is about white racial consciousness. It's about fighting back for our country from those who have taken it from us. The races came up with this and now we're putting ourselves first. If we lay down and die it's all over.

Fight! Fight! Fight!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49949005)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49949493

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5875579&forum_id=2#49949508)