Uber launches “no incel drivers” feature for women
| Confused candlestick maker garrison | 07/23/25 | | aquamarine wild hospital french chef | 07/23/25 | | Confused candlestick maker garrison | 07/23/25 | | Long TERF War for PeterBoi Poon | 07/23/25 | | Swashbuckling dopamine | 07/23/25 | | topaz affirmative action | 07/23/25 | | Submissive frozen school cafeteria | 07/23/25 | | painfully honest theater stage | 07/23/25 | | Citrine Set | 07/23/25 | | painfully honest theater stage | 07/23/25 | | Afghan HDI charts | 07/23/25 | | t3h P0aStEr oF d00m!!!!!!!! | 07/23/25 | | Afghan HDI charts | 07/23/25 | | t3h P0aStEr oF d00m!!!!!!!! | 07/23/25 | | Sienna lettuce piazza | 07/23/25 | | Confused candlestick maker garrison | 07/23/25 | | Trust If Aryan | 07/23/25 | | Metal Up Your Ass | 07/23/25 | | Judas Jones | 07/23/25 | | .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,... | 07/23/25 | | ''"'"''"''''"""''' | 07/23/25 | | rick'claim panama | 07/23/25 | | .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,... | 07/23/25 | | chilmata | 07/24/25 | | .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,... | 07/24/25 | | neg | 07/23/25 | | UhOh | 07/23/25 | | .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,... | 07/23/25 | | Do you agree? | 07/23/25 | | pitbulls eating your face in hell forever tp | 07/23/25 | | UhOh | 07/23/25 | | pitbulls eating your face in hell forever tp | 07/24/25 | | Crimson Permanent Assurance | 07/23/25 | | ''"'"''"''''"""''' | 07/23/25 | | ''"'"''"''''"""''' | 07/24/25 | | UhOh | 07/24/25 | | Post nut horror | 07/24/25 | | place feels done | 07/24/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 23rd, 2025 12:33 PM
Author: .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,...
Interesting. As I recall, there was a startup that was an Uber clone that only allowed female drivers and passengers. It ended up getting shut down because some Hawaii judge said that was discriminatory. I wonder if Uber gets away with it because it allows men on its platform. It still makes me think that there is a lawsuit here if some dude was late to some important event because the only drivers in the area were women who didn't want male passengers.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753653&forum_id=2#49124675) |
 |
Date: July 23rd, 2025 5:15 PM
Author: .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,...
I didn't think about that angle as well, but given that male drivers currently earn significantly more than female drivers, I think that case is harder to argue. But it will be interesting. My understanding is that the reason that male drivers earn more is because the best time to drive for Uber is when the bars close, and female drivers don't want to let a bunch of drunk randos into their cars. If female drivers suddenly start earning significantly more than their male counterparts once this change goes into effect, the male drivers might have a case.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753653&forum_id=2#49125538) |
 |
Date: July 24th, 2025 1:48 PM
Author: .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,...
I was just trying to figure out who would have standing to sue Uber, dumbass. I could more easily imagine a scenario where a male passenger suffers damages because a female driver refuses to pick him up. Given that male drivers already earn significantly more on Uber, it would be hard to show that a male driver suffered damages because a few female passengers didn't want him to pick them up.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753653&forum_id=2#49127686) |
 |
Date: July 23rd, 2025 5:17 PM
Author: .,.,,...,...,..,....,...,...,...
I'm not a constitutional lawyer, but my understanding is that gender-based laws get intermediate scrutiny rather than strict scrutiny for laws based on race. And when you consider the fact that female Uber drivers earn significantly less than male drivers and most of that is explained by the fact that they are scared to let random drunk guys into their cars when the bars close, I think there is a good chance that this type of policy would survive intermediate scrutiny.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5753653&forum_id=2#49125543) |
|
|