The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
In house privacy attorney; prestigious?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 15th, 2025 12:28 PM Author: Cassius King Are these jobs prestigious? Is this the new fast-track to a GC role? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933519) |
Date: May 15th, 2025 12:32 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) No. No. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933532) |
 |
Date: May 15th, 2025 12:53 PM Author: Cassius King Thanks for the insight. So, should I get a privacy certification? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933616) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 12:54 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) No. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933618) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 12:55 PM Author: potluck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933622) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:56 PM Author: The Emilio Estevez of the SEC (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933894) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:15 PM Author: Cassius King Why not (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933698) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 12:55 PM Author: potluck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933620) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:56 PM Author: The Emilio Estevez of the SEC (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933895) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:58 PM Author: internet g0y (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933906) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 12:56 PM Author: ,.,.,.,........,....,,,.. Nah. It can be a good chill gig but no one treats these guys strategically. It’s a compliance monkey job. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933627) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:00 PM Compliance guy here. This is correct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933636) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:13 PM Author: Cassius King What are you implying by saying they’re not treated strategically? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933688) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:52 PM Author: ,.,.,.,........,....,,,.. It’s a checklist job. That’s not good training for strategic skillset which is just judgment based and accepting a lot of risk (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933873) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:54 PM Author: blow off some steam *farts cum* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933882) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:14 PM Author: '"'"'"''" Literally no lawyer job is prestigious. Monkey scribes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933690) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:57 PM Author: The Emilio Estevez of the SEC What about Autoadmit poaster jobs? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933899) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 2:38 PM Author: '"'"'"''" Depends on your proximity to the load bearing slash, brother. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48934067) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 7:45 PM Author: The Emilio Estevez of the SEC 938347748387476473746467373646737736463777465 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48934989) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:14 PM Author: blow off some steam great thread
great poasters
great forum |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:56 PM Author: The Emilio Estevez of the SEC Took the words right out of my mouth 🐶 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933897) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:59 PM Author: potluck (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933910) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 6:19 PM Author: The Emilio Estevez of the SEC (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48934775) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 2:39 PM Author: off some steam (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48934069) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:16 PM Author: .;:..;:.;.:.;.,,,..,.:,.;....;,;;;..;,..,,.,,...., Lmao no. Inhouse compliance roles are the first to go extinct with Gen AI (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933706) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 1:58 PM Author: internet g0y those are jobs for women not men (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48933905) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 6:48 PM Author: Wang Hernandez It’s the shitlaw of in-house compliance activities. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48934834) |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 10:33 PM Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, It's a good gig in the sense that you get to be an "expert" that people have to check in with on every deal.
But its annoying because you're mostly delivering bad news, or telling people that some deal is incredibly "risky" because someone might find out the customer's name.
A lot of it to me is obviously make work from privacy counsels. They all insist on having 10 page data processing addendums - but i think this is only becuase its such a new area of law that they're flaming everyone. I think there's a chance in 10 years the contracts go back to say "Each party agrees to comply with all data privacy laws and safeguard data with reasonable care" and people start ignoring the privacy attorneys. |
|
Date: May 15th, 2025 10:45 PM Author: ,.,.,.,........,....,,,.. EU: lol, no
What strikes me is that most privacy counsel are barely acting like real lawyers. These privacy addenda are just another legal agreement. But most have no idea how to risk adjust anything. They’ll spend time going back and forth on a customer standard vs your own standard when realistically they’re the same from a risk standpoint. If there’s any damage from breach it will have nothing to do with whatever is being discussed. It’s just factual check boxing activity. Shameful stuff. |
|
Date: May 16th, 2025 12:40 AM Author: you\'re the puppet Write your DPA to cover all confidential data, exclude DPA requirements from liability cap. And a lot of vendors will let that slide. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48935887) |
|
Date: May 16th, 2025 1:01 AM Author: ,.,.,.,........,....,,,.. Let what slide? And it’s a problem on both sides. The people negotiating these things have no concept that damages arise from a breach. The endless debate over security requirements is just a diligence exercise with people talking past each other and it’s needless friction from a risk adjusted standpoint. But you’ll have months of calls on this shit. The anal approach taken by most privacy types wouldn’t be tolerated in a deal environment. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5725371&forum_id=2#48935913) |