If there's no real resistance then history is all just a bunch of constant victory laps (with a few roadbumps like esoteric GENIUSES on xo/substack figuring out their schemes) for the evil cabal amirite?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013296)

https://www.best-poems.net/charles_bukowski/index.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013379)

For example Junger's anarch is literally just Nietzsche's ubermensch, restated with some silly personal cope of Junger

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013383)

https://neofeudalism.substack.com/p/deeper-societal-trends-predating

And this one too:

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-egalitarian-ratchet-effect-why

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013390)

I suspect that you have probably figured this out by now, judging by your recent work, but you're committed to the blackpill shtick so you've kind of painted yourself into a corner that you're trying to wriggle your way out of without having to admit that "blackpilling" never made any sense

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013422)

Ahhhh, just looked him up, and this person was a Literal Blackpiller pseud. Yup, figures. I'd be mad too if someone completely nuked my entire self-constructed personal identity with no hope of salvaging it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013451)

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/a-philosophy-of-decay-emil-cioran

The interview from which that quote is pulled is here:

https://www.itinerariesofahummingbird.com/e-m-cioran.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013456)

This probably goes hard if you're a 106 IQ Redditor

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013472)

as a kid "if youre old enough to fight youre old enough to vote!" makes sense, but as an adult i realize this was the same shit as "voter suppression" i.e. packing the electorate with more easily duped retards.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013667)

One of their goals, other than the Greater Israel project, is to institute a permanent neoliberal feudalism overseen by a woke AI + CBDC that they intend to last forever, overlording over a 70-80 IQ mixed race population for sexual exploitation and medical experimentation.

It's almost in place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013316)

Also why would they want to sexually experiment with a bunch of 70-80 IQ muds? Aren't they eugenicists?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013349)

They want to experiment on the general population because they want to live forever. That's part of the rationale for the COVID death jabs, to use people as cattle, medically experiment on them in the hopes of finding a cure for them to live forever. This will continue.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013361)

It focuses on the financial aspects so you might appreciate it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013374)

but the idea that it was all planned is conspiratorial and fantastic. the truth is that it's just people behaving in their own self interest. more of history is written by the victors thing -- the rich and powerful are apt to dismiss and demonize ideas that are against their interest.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013407)

i have skimmed it but much like your substack it's leaps of casuality and such show its not worthy of serious consideration. but i am familiar with it's argument broadly.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013424)

there is no man behind the curtain. the fantasy that there is is comforting to conspiracy theorists because it means everything is ordered and causal even if the people in charge are evil. the reality is we're just people who are programmed to act in our self-interest.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013473)

my issue is that your shit isnt cogent and frequently factually incorrect. i don't endlessly squable with views i disagree with so long as they are internally consistent, be that epahs transkids or tbfs redneck revolution.

what my adhd latches onto are people that are simply wrong within their own framework or just factually. thats why i endlessly screed to you, nsam, spaceporn, etc. if your theories were cogent id walk away even if i completely disagreed. what irks me is that they contradict themselves and rely on falseifiable beliefs.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013491)

I addressed this criticism in footnote 3 of my latest post:

"One of the common criticisms I receive for my writing style is something along these lines: “He always assumes facts not in evidence. I’ve tried reading his Substack, it’ll be “normal” paleo-con conspiracy stuff and then he’ll casually drop a line like, “and in 1973 when the population of Luxembourg was replaced by shape-shifting chimps” and then he just continues on as if that requires no further explanation.” This was a funny comment. My writing style does often shift suddenly from historically grounded material into speculative or metaphysical assertions, and in posts where I move quickly across political, historical, and metaphysical registers, I sometimes present synthesis or conclusion as self-evident when, from the outside, it reads as assertion without argument. I understand this, and there is some truth to the criticism. However, a couple points in response:

Finding the balance between writing for new vs existing readers is a tricky thing. The original giant essay has well over 1,000 links and I think documents my train of thought step by step pretty well, and here is a brief summary of my overarching ideas. I can't reiterate the basics over and over for each weekly post, which assumes a certain level of understanding with ideas discussed weekly for the past two years. I understand this raises the bar for new readers to get into my material.

I write in a mythic/initiatory mode, not a journalistic or academic one. I’m ultimately not trying to persuade through empirical rigor in every paragraph but to model a worldview that is internally consistent, symbolically resonant, and psychically honest. To ask for citation chains for every esoteric or visionary claim is like asking Yeats for footnotes in The Second Coming.

The “assumption” is intentional: my style often mimics that of sacred or prophetic texts - I declare more than argue. This is a rhetorical decision. It’s not that I lack evidence or reasoning, but that I embed it structurally rather than unpacking it at each turn. The feeling of certainty or of revelation is part of the delivery which makes it more polarizing, but also more powerful for those attuned to it."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013499)

But I recommend you buy the physical copy if you do like it in order to support Preparata's efforts.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013381)

Or are people like you also anticipated by the powers that be

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013396)

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/the-current-thing-is-modernitys-religion

https://neofeudalreview.substack.com/p/opiate-for-the-masses-narratives

"Why do such powerful forces continue to allow you to write?"

Because they have total institutional control and control over the internet now, which they didn't have through 2016; they've managed to defang speech without banning it outright (through dissemination of huge amounts of disinformation, using hordes of AI debate bots online, funneling people toward algorithmic ghettos). People screaming into the nether online doesn't impact their power at this point because no one can organize against it in real life.

"Aren’t you going to get the rope when the AI assisted gestapo searches the internet?"

Yes, when they unleash their woke AI / CBDC / social credit score Mark of the Beast system I'm assuredly going to end up with a shitty score. I try not to think about it too much. But in the meantime I inadvertently give them valuable data about the thinking process of an autistic dissident through putting my ideas and beliefs online, which improves their malevolent AI.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013406)

I think you have your answer there champ. If none of what you write will lead to any realistic positive outcome it’s all just intellectual mastrubation, inadvertently in service of evil.

You might as well hand write this stuff Uncle Ted style for posterity

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013423)

I don't agree with this part. Here's a poem:

The Butterfly Effect

Knowledge of the world

Doesn’t change

That one must still live in it

one can wax poetic all day

The Rothschilds

The central bankers

The meta conspiracies

But at the end of the day

I still have bills to pay

I have to go to work

I still have to interact with zombies

What good

Is knowledge

Without action?

Mental masturbation

But

A calling

Is a calling

Is a calling

A butterfly beats its wings

Who knows

What effect it will have

A world away?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013428)

well could all do more. im an adherent of uncle ted and recognize i am selfishly cucking because im not willing to sacrifice myself for something i think is futile.

one of irksome things about you is you externalize everything to some "they." you criticize "they" for not revolting but won't even speak anonymously. which makes no sense within your own belief system where the central bankers are permitting you to share your dissident theories. you want to have your cake and eat it. be a freedom fighter or brave truthteller but not associate your irl to it even though according to you it already is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013459)

if your theories were true and if people rose up you would be the last to do so and I've just proven it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013500)

He and the other guy are trying to force you to admit that you write the things you do for yourself and for your own benefit, and not because you are noble or selfless or trying to formulate some kind of resistance against the powers that be or spread awareness about them

This is why everyone does anything and there's nothing wrong with that. Past a certain age, people who try to deny that they're living life for themselves and for the people immediately around them are pretty cringe in the eyes of others who 'get it'

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013514)

additionally it's not just that he doesn't admit this but that he externalizes everything onto a "they." "they" are cucked by the central bankers, but not consuela, who isn't even brave enough to speak into a vocaroo.

because consuela types are narcissitic he always interprets these entreats with gjr "ew gross stop trying to fuck me" when i really dont care who he is or what he sounds like but am just annoyed that he's a hypocrite that lacks the courage of his convictions.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5737486&forum_id=2#49013520)