The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
decision made NOT to indict Comey (link)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 25th, 2025 6:58 PM Author: humphrey's (((executor))) ((zurich is stained)) https://apnews.com/article/james-comey-charged-lying-congress-a2c72e1a5bb73d588f3af7fdb56caa82 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303290) |
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:00 PM Author: i gave my cousin head nsam vindicated (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303298) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:02 PM Author: fucking How do tall guys who are also wimps fare in the clink? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303300) |
 |
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:08 PM Author: CapTTTainFalcon fucking (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303315) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:07 PM Author: hank_scorpio do they have him dead to rights? Doesn't seem like any of the hand wringing over Trump being mean ever mentions a single actual defense of Comey (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303312) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:12 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, i still can't find a link to the actual Q and A. the news accounts say it was a denial that he used anyone to leak.
but we did learn that Comey had his friend Richman leak to the NYT.
if that's the theory of prosecution i don't see what's wrong with it. |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:15 PM Author: hank_scorpio the most annoying thing about 10 years of journalists fellating themselves for being so fucking great is how they don't bother to do any journalism at all anymore, like none (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303335) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:16 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, they suck.
https://news.gallup.com/poll/651977/americans-trust-media-remains-trend-low.aspx |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:44 PM Author: Metal Up Your Ass *inserts tweet from NYDogMom77*
*inserts tweet from BigTexFBall69*
*goes to lunch* |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:42 PM Author: The Midwit Pundit's Assassination (No Future) It's a nothing crime but it is still a crime
|
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:46 PM Author: richard clock (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303428) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:17 PM Author: Paralegal Amos i wonder if he's regretting working so hard to get trump elected in 2016 🤣 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303344) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:48 PM Author: ...,....,,........ We won't know until the cell doors shut close for the first time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303432) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 8:26 PM Author: aznpussydestroyer6938582 Will he be a kingpin or a punk inside? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303548) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:32 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Senator Cruz: (01:51:30) [Comments about FISA matters.] All right. Let's shift to another topic. On May 3rd, 2017, in this committee, Chairman Grassley asked you point blank, "Have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?" You responded under oath, "Never." He then asked you, "Have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton administration?" You responded again under oath, "No." Now, as you know, Mr. McCabe, who works for you, has publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal and that you were directly aware of it and that you directly authorized it. Now, what Mr. McCabe is saying and what you testified to this committee cannot both be true. One or the other is false. Who's telling the truth?
Mr. Comey: (01:52:43) I can only speak to my testimony. I stand by the testimony you summarized that I gave in May of 2017.
Senator Cruz: (01:52:50) So your testimony is you've never authorized anyone to leak? And Mr. McCabe, if he says contrary, is not telling the truth, is that correct?
Mr. Comey: (01:52:58) Again, I'm not going to characterize Andy's testimony, but mine is the same today. |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:34 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, so this looks like a McCabe leak and not the Richman leak. if i'm correct that these are the two answers at issue. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303394) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 8:05 PM Author: Leftism is a mental disease Ingraham is reporting this is the lie. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303495) |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 8:07 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, thanks.
the problem is that McCabe has lied over and over again, even under oath. hard to build a perjury case upon the testimony of a serial perjurer. |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 8:12 PM Author: ...,....,,........ Even bigger problem is that a Grand Jury REFUSED to return an indictment against McCabe.
So how are you going to convict Comey based upon the "truth" of McCabe's statement when a Grand Jury didn't believe he committed a crime?
LOL! |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 8:16 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ? doesn't that bolster McCabe?
it's not the leak that is the basis of the new indictment; it's the alleged lying about it. it's a process crime. |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 8:18 PM Author: ...,....,,........ WHAT CRIME WAS COMMITTED!?!
McCabe said that he spoke with Comey THE DAY AFTER the article came out and told Comey that he (McCabe) authorized the disclosure.
So when did McCabe ever say, "Yes, Comey authorized me to leak the information."
??? |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 8:19 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ok, i see.
link? where did McCabe say he got authorization only after the leak? it's a good argument if supported. |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 8:34 PM Author: ...,....,,........ "Comey, in his September 2020 testimony, told Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, that he stood by prior testimony that he did not, as FBI director, authorize a leak of information to The Wall Street Journal for an October 2016 article that detailed a Justice Department probe of then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s email use.
Cruz told the Justice Department in a letter three months later that former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe admitted knowing about and authorizing the leak.
McCabe insisted that Comey was aware of his decision to authorize the disclosure, while Comey “has denied this claim,” Cruz wrote.
“Mr. Comey and Mr. McCabe’s statements are irreconcilably contradictory,” Cruz wrote. “Mr. McCabe says that he told Mr. Comey of the leak and that Mr. Comey approved — effectively authorizing the leak after the fact. Mr. Comey, on the other hand, has said that he neither authorized the leak nor knew of Mr. McCabe’s involvement.”
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/25/james-comey-indicted-fbi-trump.html |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 8:37 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, if the authorization is entirely "after the fact" then Comey should not have been indicted on this matter. fair point.
authorization means pre-approval in the normal sense and if the argument is that it's retroactive then the statement is way too variable in meaning to support a perjury indictment. |
|
Date: September 25th, 2025 7:43 PM Author: Senior Ethics Official Something happened to his brain. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5780014&forum_id=2#49303422) |