nobody wants to live in Germany because it's a third world shithole full of brownoids and muslims

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50212853)

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/10/29/business/volkswagen-loss-china.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50213329)

“nobody will be successful with the old recipe” of developing cars in Europe and selling them at a premium price abroad--

>natural selection demands adaptation and changing with the environment

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50213580)

but blame migrants, losers!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50213340)

GM got screwed too. chinamen loved buick for a while for some reason. now they dgaf.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50213756)

So it just proves that Western Euro only suceeded cause of colonialism and the system that created, the second that system diminished they decliend

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50214216)

just this week, the far left candidate who won in Berlin annotated a position paper that was being sent to a left-leaning journalist. but she and her team accidentally left her comments visible to the journalist.

what did she accidentally reveal? that Hamas controls her party and she is terrified of it.

========

A mistake has just triggered an astonishing security crisis. The magazine Der Spiegel—a media outlet, it must be noted, with a marked leftist slant—has brought to light an internal document proving how Die Linke has been hijacked by Islamism.

Its candidate to govern Berlin, Elif Eralp, accidentally sent the newsroom her private notes from an interview where she confesses to being coerced and terrified by Hamas operatives within her own party.

It turns out that after an interview, the candidate's team reviewed the transcript. During this process, Eralp made internal comments that were meant to remain in the strictest confidentiality. However, the document with the un-erased annotations was sent back to the journalists.

The content of those notes is dynamite. When Der Spiegel asked her about Ibrahim Ibrahim—a pro-Palestinian Hamas sympathizer who celebrated the October 7 massacre—the public response was going to be evasive. But in the margin of the leaked document, Eralp wrote the truth: "There is a PROBLEM. [...] my husband no, and neither do I, want to name specific names, he is afraid of these people and so am I."

The leak exposes the raw reality of Islamo-leftism in Germany: Eralp even went so far as to compare the threat level of these pro-Palestinian militants to that of Organized Crime and implores to abort the publication: "I can't put myself and my family in danger for Der SPIEGEL. What do we do now? Do we scrap the whole interview?"

https://x.com/KarinaLMariani/status/2115828079289340195

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50213844)

https://x.com/queru_lant/status/1921330840648184269

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50213922)

There are a number of areas where you could legitimately argue for the superiority of the US over Germany as a nation, but the relative quality of political leadership isn't one of them. Someone like Trump wouldn't even get elected mayor of a small German town. Seriously.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50213931)

Merz's approval ratings are -73%.

you: German politicians are wonderful!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50213961)

Anyone surprised by what's happening with Die Linke in Berlin, Germany, hasn't read history. It's reproducing the same pattern as in Iran with Khomeini, but on a local scale?

In 1978-1979, the Iranian left wasn't "instrumentalized against its will." It chose to carry Khomeini. The Tudeh Party (the pro-Soviet communist party) ended up openly supporting him as the leading anti-imperialist figure.

The Fedayeen and other Marxist groups fought the Shah in the streets alongside the Islamists, amplified his messages from exile, and saw the mullahs as a tactical ally against "the main enemy": the modernizing Shah, the monarchy, and Western influence. For a large part of the students, secular intellectuals, and militants, the Shah's advances—women's rights, mass education, industrialization—weren't progress; they were "Westernization" to be destroyed. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. They believed the Islamists would be a brief interlude, a tool against the real adversary, and that power would be reclaimed afterward.

This calculation was bolstered by Western self-righteousness. Michel Foucault went to Iran, met Khomeini in Neauphle-le-Château, and published enthusiastic articles celebrating a "political spirituality" against Western materialism. He described Khomeini as an "old saint in exile" and the revolution as something singular and authentic, not as a project for clerical rule. Sartre, Beauvoir, Genet, journalists from Libération or Le Monde, and American voices (Andrew Young comparing Khomeini to a social democrat and the revolution to the civil rights movement) offered favorable coverage. The dominant narrative was one of an oppressed people against a pro-American tyrant.

Warnings about the theocratic project (velayat-e faqih), about women, minorities, or secularists were treated as secondary. Khomeini benefited from a media platform and an aura of legitimacy that the Shah no longer had. The humanitarian and media pressure under Carter also contributed to paralyzing the regime's ability to repress.

The outcome is well-known and bloody. Once the Shah was gone and power seized, Khomeini crushed those same allies. Purges of left-wing organizations, executions, dissolution of the Tudeh, liquidation of the Fedayeen and other groups. The Iranian and Western useful idiots discovered that political Islamism doesn't share: it purges. Western self-righteousness, for the most part, looked the other way or downplayed it. Anti-Westernism had taken precedence over clarity.

This is exactly the pattern Die Linke is reproducing today in Berlin. It's courting the most radical "pro-Palestine" circles—figures close to Hamas and the PFLP, Neukölln networks, presence at their victory parties—to win votes. It's turning a blind eye to celebrations of October 7, calls for violence, and antisemitism in the name of anti-racism and the main enemy.

The programs say "no to Islamism." The facts say "we're taking the votes." And already, candidate Elif Eralp is getting caught out by her own notes: she and her husband are afraid of "those people," refuse to name them, and fear for their family. This is the stage where the allies start realizing the partner isn't a temporary tool.

In Iran, the price was a theocratic dictatorship and decades of repression. In Germany, we're at successful electoral clientelism and the first visible cracks. The mechanism is the same: alliance of circumstance, self-righteous denial, legitimizing the partner, then the late discovery that political Islamists impose their rules.

History has already warned; it hasn't changed its methods. Those who claim "this time it's different" are simply refusing to read what's already written.

https://x.com/Guigz75116/status/2116077288542425416?a=CmvXSbPyfMh9hhCPufY&s=20

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50217125)

Rate is up 25% in us last 20 years (so the raw number is likely up closer to 40%) btw lol

https://www.cdc.gov/suicide/data/index.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5916008&forum_id=2#50217204)