The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Halligan never secured an indictment in the Comey case
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 19th, 2025 12:11 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. https://x.com/krassenstein/status/1991185424790790298?s=46
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/james-comey-doj-case-hearing-11-19-25? |
Date: November 19th, 2025 12:12 PM Author: gibberish (?) Jfc she looks like her t levels are off the charts. I bet that burley jaw cracks down mean on a cock. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49443816) |
 |
Date: November 19th, 2025 12:16 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. that’s why you end up with stuff like this
https://x.com/rparloff/status/1991189111227465778?s=46 |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 12:17 PM Author: gibberish (?) Wow con free thread bro. Just us libs. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49443825) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 4:48 PM Author: Amateur Millennial Butt Porn lol at the reply guys screaming “they were identical!!!” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444518) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:16 PM Author: CapTTTainFalcon holy manjaw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444750) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:26 PM Author: spherequeer (✅🍑) would bang with wild enthusiasm (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447296) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 4:18 PM Author: ....:::..:....:::..:...;;;..;...:.:: I'm surprised more brethren aren't poasting about this on the great LAW bort. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444423) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 4:46 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. they really want Comey convicted. every one of these fuck ups (appointment issues, grand jury process issues, selective/vindictive prosecution motions) is like a punch in the gut (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444514) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 4:48 PM Author: Amateur Millennial Butt Porn It’s hilarious (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444519) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 4:52 PM Author: ....:::..:....:::..:...;;;..;...:.:: And hasn't the SOL run on this now so if it's get tossed they can't re-charge him? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444534) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 4:54 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. there’s a provision where they can try to re-indict him within 6 months even after the SOL runs but that doesn’t apply if it gets dismissed with prejudice, and given how egregious the Trump DOJ’s conduct has been I think the judge will conclude that’s the proper remedy. of course that’s completely separate from the appointment challenge which has its own issues (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444543) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 4:53 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, i'm no criminal procedure masterman but it seems like failing to get a lawful indictment is a problem. (ywia for this tremendous insight!) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444538) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 8:14 AM Author: Candy Ride No crimmmo but do all the grand jurors need to look at the indictment to make it legit. Grand juries have a bunch of people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49445809) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 5:21 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. https://x.com/edkrassen/status/1991243856252137793?s=46 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444608) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:12 PM Author: (*)> (i'm in your city) need some xo crim procedure mastermen to weigh in here.
preferably conservative ones to ensure no taint of liberal bias |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:16 PM Author: CapTTTainFalcon *halligan smothering ur face w/ her taint* (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444751) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:20 PM Author: (*)> (i'm in your city) are you an xo conservative crim proced. masterman? if so, can you tell me what this means? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444756) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:30 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) It’s fairly shocking. Literally a mistake I’ve never heard of anyone making.
Normally it’d be fixable, but this thing got filed within days of the SOL. There’s a default rule that gives them tolling, but I’m not sure it applies here. There was literally no indictment returned.
Love TRUMP, still do, etc. But spellbinding. And honestly, very on brand. This is all part of demeaning and debasing the establishment. |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:45 PM Author: (*)> (i'm in your city) excellent. thank you (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447348) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:25 PM Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, What is the allegation here?
Is there a claim that there was a substantive deception of the court?
Or is this just them screwing up admin bullshit |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:27 PM Author: Cyber Round Table (America First) THE LAW REQUIRES THE FULL GJ TO CONVENE TO REVIEW THE AMENDED COMPLAINT. DON'T YOU GET IT? THIS IS THE LAW! IT MUST BE FOLLOWED TO A T! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444768) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:26 PM Author: Cyber Round Table (America First) So the full GJ did approve 2 of the charges, rejected one. The DOJ amended it to take out the charge that the GJ rejected it, and the law requires the full GJ to convene and review the new indictment in full (the charges of which they already approved) but they skipped a procedural step and just had the foreman sign the amended charges?
OH THE HUMANITY. Libs are so right this is the most corrupt administration in history. Crazy that this happened in our lifetime! In 2025! |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:30 PM Author: (*)> (i'm in your city) are you saying (i) this isn't a big deal but it's procedurally improper and grounds for dismissal or (ii) not procedurally improper or grounds for dismissal. if (i), do you feel that the laws in this area (criminal procedure) should be changed ad hoc in this case so as to allow this indictment to continue? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444776) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:39 PM Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, Libs are freaking out like this is some sort of huge scandal.
It's like they're saying somewhat cheated at golf - and we're trying to figure out if they moved their ball when no one was looking, or if they forgot to sign their score card before turning it in.
Seems like this is a forgetting to sign your score card scenario. I'm not really here to weigh in on what the correct next steps are, just that it doesn't appear to be any malfeasance here. |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:42 PM Author: Cyber Round Table (America First) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444801) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:46 PM Author: (*)> (i'm in your city) ok thanks for clarifying what you're saying. so, can we agree that if the proper remedy for this series of actions by the DOJ is dismissal of the case with prejudice, that is the price to pay based on the current rules and if we want to pay a lesser price we'll need to amend the crim rules of procedure? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444816) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:08 PM Author: Amateur Millennial Butt Porn lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49445250) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:38 PM Author: coiffed sandwich Cr this is shaping up to be a nothingburger (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444792) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:41 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. It’s literally going to get the case dismissed if it isn’t dismissed on other grounds (improper appointment or selective/vindictive prosecution) first (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444798) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:43 PM Author: Cyber Round Table (America First) Tick, tock, Jim. Libs grasping at straws here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444803) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:52 PM Author: (*)> (i'm in your city) are you a criminal lawyer? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444828) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:59 PM Author: Cyber Round Table (America First) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444847) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:43 PM Author: Cyber Round Table (America First) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444802) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 7:55 AM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. hilarious. please explain why this is also a nothing burger
https://x.com/rparloff/status/1990458821324771711?s=46 |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:27 PM Author: spherequeer (✅🍑) really? in 2025? really? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447299) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 6:47 PM Author: (*)> (i'm in your city) i'm starting to think there are no actual criminal lawyers ITT... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49444817) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 10:48 PM Author: coiffed sandwich there werent any crim lawyers in the grand jury room either apparently (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49445303) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 7:42 AM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49445746) |
|
Date: November 19th, 2025 8:44 PM Author: kenneth play i want to know what luis thinks about it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49445114) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 1:17 AM Author: ....:::..:....:::..:...;;;..;...:.:: In addition they completely misstated the law and facts to the GJ in a way that would get them to convict.
Judge already is enraged about that and has extremely serious concerns about that not withstanding the fact she lacked capacity and notwithstanding this latest revelation. |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 8:44 AM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. nothingburger (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49445863) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 8:37 AM Author: Civil Attorney “Only the BEST people folks.” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49445847) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 1:56 PM Author: (*)> (i'm in your city) just wondering if there are any crim lawyers that practice in federal court today (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49446929) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:24 PM Author: Nazca Redlines Defendants have been filing appeals about alleged grand jury issues for centuries. SCOTUS is clear about those issues: "We hold that, as a general matter, a district court may not dismiss an indictment for errors in grand jury proceedings unless such errors prejudiced the defendants." https://openjurist.org/487/us/250
How would obtaining an indictment on counts 2 and 3, then getting the foreman to sign an indictment showing the GJ indicted on counts 2 and 3 prejudice Comey? |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:25 PM Author: ...,...,,.::..;,.,:,:,,..,::.,:,.,.:.:.,:. the judge is sure acting like this, combined with the trumpturd prosecutor's dozen other fuck ups, is a problem (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447293) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:38 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447333) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:27 PM Author: spherequeer (✅🍑) precisely (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447301) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:38 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. What about this? No prejudice to the Defendant?
https://x.com/rparloff/status/1990458821324771711?s=46 |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:39 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. Would not actually getting an indictment be considered prejudicial to the defendant? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447335) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 3:55 PM Author: Risten No (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447363) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 4:50 PM Author: .,.,.,.,.,...,.,,.,,.....,.,..,.,,...,.,.,,...,. Trumpkins? your response? https://x.com/AlexPfeiffer/status/1991598374903325105 |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 4:53 PM Author: (*)> (i'm in your city) this is completely inconsistent with what multiple DOJ attorneys said in open court yesterday? including the lead prosecutor? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447500) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 5:08 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/-4eLhKosXdo
i'm still confused. megyn kelly says it was done correctly. |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 4:58 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. wow so they drafted a new indictment, presented it to the GJ, and the GJ voted on it all writhin 7 minutes? Thats impressive! Trump really does hire the best (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447508) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 4:57 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, one lawyer told me that this is a ministerial issue that is easily cured -- nbd. another told me that t his will end up in the disbarment of Halligan. i still have no idea. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447505) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 5:01 PM Author: .,.,.....,.,.;,.,,,:,.,.,::,..,.:,..;,.. is telling the GJ the defendant may have to testify in his own defense to prove his innocence a ministerial issue? How about telling the GJ they weren’t just voting on the evidence before them and can assume the govt has better evidence it will present at trial? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447515) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2025 5:04 PM Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, i haven't a clue if any of that happened altho it certainly doesn't sound good. do we have any crim law mastermen here? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5799928&forum_id=2#49447525) |