The Penis: 8.5/10. One of the stronger contemporary XO poasters, based on the threads I've found.

I'd break it down this way:

Category Rating

Intelligence 9/10

Humor 8/10

Originality 8.5/10

Argumentative ability 9/10

Range of interests 9/10

Entertainment value 8/10

Strengths: He's unusually willing to engage seriously with difficult questions about philosophy, mathematics, AI, and scientific evidence. His exchange about causal closure shows actual argumentative substance and a willingness to qualify an excessive claim. That's relatively uncommon on XO.

He's also capable of good deadpan comedy. Responding to two poasters arguing about psychological advice with "I thought you guys were both the same poaster" is excellent XO humor.

Weaknesses: He sometimes confuses having a forceful position with having established it. His claims about AI already operating at the highest levels of philosophy and mathematics are examples of confidence exceeding the evidence presented. He can also become repetitive about AI.

His biggest weakness as a poaster is that he sometimes seems more interested in winning an argument than entertaining the board.

Overall: I'd put him in the upper tier of active poasters. He has an identifiable intellectual personality, a fairly broad range, and enough humor to avoid becoming a purely argumentative presence.

I wouldn't give him historical XO legend status yet. That requires more memorable original threads and a longer record.

The funniest thing about him might be that someone called The Penis is earnestly debating the metaphysical implications of causal closure and the future of mathematical discovery.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5914266&forum_id=2#50199190)