The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
should Hadrian have followed through with Parthia?
| slap-happy sweet tailpipe faggot firefighter | 05/31/25 |
| bronze stag film | 05/31/25 |
| Internet-worthy trailer park | 05/31/25 |
| Laughsome medicated site | 05/31/25 |
| plum heaven half-breed | 05/31/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 31st, 2025 10:11 PM Author: slap-happy sweet tailpipe faggot firefighter (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732006&forum_id=2#48977918) |
Date: May 31st, 2025 10:15 PM Author: bronze stag film he had peace, which is all the Romans could hope for there
|
|
Date: May 31st, 2025 11:43 PM Author: Internet-worthy trailer park It would have been extremely difficult for him to control. The best case scenario would have been something like the Seleucids, Westerners who controlled most of modern day Iran for 150+ years after inheriting it from Alexander the Great. But they only had their eastern possessions yo worry about. Hadrian had to keep the barbarians along the German, British and Saharan frontiers in line, on top of ruling all the Western provinces and keeping a constant eye out for any generals who tried to become Emperor. It would have been very tough, and Hadrian realized that. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732006&forum_id=2#48978015) |
|
Date: May 31st, 2025 11:49 PM Author: Laughsome medicated site Better question is what would have happened if Caesar had lived to do his Parthian expedition. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732006&forum_id=2#48978022) |
|
Date: May 31st, 2025 11:51 PM Author: plum heaven half-breed not a mfe but how would having followed through have made a big difference in Roman history? they were already pretty clearly overexpanded and couldn't manage the outer regions from the core (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732006&forum_id=2#48978028) |