\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

3 lib SCOTUS justices author three 9-0 opinions that cons love

worth noting, given that the libs are more lockstep than the...
razzle-dazzle step-uncle's house
  06/06/25
It is kind of odd that scotus still/currently feels the need...
cerebral snowy mexican crackhouse
  06/06/25
ok, but i like the fact that Jackson wrote the reverse discr...
razzle-dazzle step-uncle's house
  06/06/25
Then again, they gave the catholic case to the catholic lib
Bonkers internet-worthy community account pit
  06/06/25
...
razzle-dazzle step-uncle's house
  06/06/25
Roberts takes his responsibilities seriously. He has an obli...
bisexual casino incel
  06/06/25
he also farts cum out of his asshole just like you
Turquoise fluffy prole university
  06/06/25
To be honest I haven't read 2 of these 3 specific opinions y...
cerebral snowy mexican crackhouse
  06/06/25
ridiculous that 9-0 cases get full merits reviews. these cas...
aqua masturbator
  06/06/25
aren't "catholic charities" the fuckheads behind t...
Turquoise fluffy prole university
  06/06/25
yes, and the Catholic Bishops organization is basically a cr...
razzle-dazzle step-uncle's house
  06/06/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 12:31 AM
Author: razzle-dazzle step-uncle's house

worth noting, given that the libs are more lockstep than the cons.

Kagan wrote the opinion tossing Mexico's mass tort liability suit against US gun manufacturers.

Jackson wrote the opinion tossing the Sixth Circuit's imposition of special burdens on members of majority groups suing for discrimination.

Sotomayor wrote the opinion striking down WI's singling out of just the Catholic Charities for ineligibility under WI's religious exemption for its unemployment compensation program.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48991338)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 1:09 AM
Author: cerebral snowy mexican crackhouse

It is kind of odd that scotus still/currently feels the need to play the traditional politics of pandering to libs (represented here by not only adopting narrower-than-necessary conservative opinions in order to achieve 9-0 decisions, but allowing libs to write them).

In the era of TRUMP you think they'd have that covered by the fact that the administration is losing like 90% of its cases and is vocally MAF at them for it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48991414)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 9:35 AM
Author: razzle-dazzle step-uncle's house

ok, but i like the fact that Jackson wrote the reverse discrimination opinion and Kagan wrote the one protecting gun manufacturers.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48991780)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 10:55 AM
Author: Bonkers internet-worthy community account pit

Then again, they gave the catholic case to the catholic lib

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48992000)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 11:55 AM
Author: razzle-dazzle step-uncle's house



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48992156)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 10:17 AM
Author: bisexual casino incel

Roberts takes his responsibilities seriously. He has an obligation to pursue decisions that draw the most consensus. He catches a lot of shit but he has navigated a difficult period in American politics very well.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48991886)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 11:00 AM
Author: Turquoise fluffy prole university

he also farts cum out of his asshole just like you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48992014)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 2:34 PM
Author: cerebral snowy mexican crackhouse

To be honest I haven't read 2 of these 3 specific opinions yet, so I don't know if cons really sacrificed much substantively. This (consensus-seeking narrowing) has happened a lot recently with the Free Exercise Clause: e.g., Fulton went 9-0 but didn't overrule Employment Division v. Smith, despite 5 justices concurring and saying "we should overrule Smith." <-- Okay well faggots do you dumb boomers need an IT millennial to come show you how to rename your "2021-06-01 Fulton_Concur_Alito_Edits_MAF.docx" draft into a "2021-06-20 Fulton_Op_of_Court.pdf" file?

That reverse-discrimination standard has always been weird af -- its actual motivation, I think, was just old-school old-white-man-federal-judge skepticism toward plaintiffs (and maybe discrimination plaintiffs in particular) and a desire to throw up some barriers to their cases, but it ended up coincidentally aligning with LJL 2010s-era progressive racial-hierarchy thought in the vein of "racism is an abuse of power, so blacks can't ever be said to be 'racist' against whites" -- and I could actually see Jackson et al. legit disagreeing with it as strongly / on the same basis as the cons.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48992548)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 9:38 AM
Author: aqua masturbator

ridiculous that 9-0 cases get full merits reviews. these cases should be summarily reversed quickly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48991786)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 10:59 AM
Author: Turquoise fluffy prole university

aren't "catholic charities" the fuckheads behind the migrant illegal immigrant caravans?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48992011)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 6th, 2025 11:56 AM
Author: razzle-dazzle step-uncle's house

yes, and the Catholic Bishops organization is basically a criminal syndicate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48992160)