3 lib SCOTUS justices author three 9-0 opinions that cons love
| cream stimulating stain sneaky criminal | 06/06/25 | | razzle blathering boltzmann | 06/06/25 | | cream stimulating stain sneaky criminal | 06/06/25 | | disturbing sandwich | 06/06/25 | | cream stimulating stain sneaky criminal | 06/06/25 | | vermilion principal's office becky | 06/06/25 | | Honey-headed menage | 06/06/25 | | razzle blathering boltzmann | 06/06/25 | | electric tank electric furnace | 06/06/25 | | Honey-headed menage | 06/06/25 | | cream stimulating stain sneaky criminal | 06/06/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 6th, 2025 12:31 AM Author: cream stimulating stain sneaky criminal
worth noting, given that the libs are more lockstep than the cons.
Kagan wrote the opinion tossing Mexico's mass tort liability suit against US gun manufacturers.
Jackson wrote the opinion tossing the Sixth Circuit's imposition of special burdens on members of majority groups suing for discrimination.
Sotomayor wrote the opinion striking down WI's singling out of just the Catholic Charities for ineligibility under WI's religious exemption for its unemployment compensation program.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48991338)
|
Date: June 6th, 2025 1:09 AM Author: razzle blathering boltzmann
It is kind of odd that scotus still/currently feels the need to play the traditional politics of pandering to libs (represented here by not only adopting narrower-than-necessary conservative opinions in order to achieve 9-0 decisions, but allowing libs to write them).
In the era of TRUMP you think they'd have that covered by the fact that the administration is losing like 90% of its cases and is vocally MAF at them for it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5734085&forum_id=2#48991414) |
|
|