The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Mixed feelings on Scott Adams' death (Consuela)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:21 AM Author: Consuela Scott Adams died today. I feel ambivalent leaning toward negative about him: I appreciate that he used his “fuck you” money to stand up for what he believed (otherwise what’s the use of “fuck you” money?) - it got his Dilbert cartoon widely cancelled - it’s just that what he believed was low-level culture war slop, and I really hated that he held himself out, like Jordan Peterson, as a figure who resisted the herd/peer pressure, yet caved and got the COVID heart attack jab(s) (which may have turbocharged his cancer - I think lots of people who came down with cancer recently got it from the “vaccine”). Then after he got the death jab(s) after the public pressure subsided he got really angry when called out on his hypocrisy, ranting and raving against anyone who mentioned it to him. Also, his public battle with cancer over the past 8 months or so was too public and dragged on and on, with every beat highlighted in the media - I was getting bored and waiting for him to finally die.
Lastly, I always thought his public response to his then (now ex) wife’s cancer diagnosis was unintentionally funny; on hearing the news, he said “Great, here’s another reason she won’t fuck me.” |
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:22 AM Author: So we looked at the data How can dissidents protect themselves from vaxxoids passively shedding spike proteins? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49585949) |
 |
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:35 AM Author: Consuela you're a shitlib and i understand this is both intended as strawmanning & categorization & contempt, but to answer your question plainly, even if one believed in vaccine shedding (i'm ambivalent), one can't "protect" themselves from it, just like one can't protect themselves from microplastics, 5G, or a bunch of other poisons. but i also don't (and didn't) have to consciously and actively get injected with untested mRNA poisons because big daddy science and big daddy government screamed at me to. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49585999) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 1:05 PM Author: '"'''"'''"""" my work also mandated it... and, yet, i resisted. my medical records are none of their fucking business. they'd never ask the bitches at work if they had an abortion or fags how many STDs they have. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586302) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 1:05 PM Author: Consuela Yeah I feel bad for those who got strong-armed into it. Really sucks. Did you consider getting fake papers? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586304) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:13 PM Author: UN peacekeeper (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586095) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:24 AM Author: screenman the vaccine cancer pwning is still in early days - prison isn’t enough for the people who pushed it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49585955) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:29 AM Author: Consuela my neighbor (liberal, multiple vaxxed) had cancer 15 years ago, it came back in 2022 and she died recently. i know of multiple other people who developed cancer within a year or two of the death jabs, including multiple relatively young people (~30's).
a close family friend got the death jab booster & had a stroke the next day and lived grimly on for 2 more years, 95% disabled, before dying.
a woman i know developed permanent tinnitus from it. a guy i know got Guillain-Barré syndrome.
and i really don't know that many people.
they released this as slow acting poison (for most) to give them plausible deniability, i guess, with the media and scientific establishment running cover. slow acting population reduction. |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:38 AM Author: screenman exact same situation - lots of youngmos i know getting pwned, horrible to see
a very good friend got Guillain-Barré syndrom too. Our lib neighbors still talk about getting boosted - unreal
|
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:41 AM Author: Consuela oh well (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586028) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:44 AM Author: screenman it’s sick seeing your friends kids get cancer - these people were pressured with every psychological control technique in the book (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586034) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:45 AM Author: Consuela yeah they were targeted victims of intentional predation, it does suck. if there's a silver lining i think the elites used up a lot of their institutional legitimacy here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586039) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 1:01 PM Author: Labia Menorah what's the theory behind it causing cancer? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586283) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 1:02 PM Author: Consuela All prior longterm mRNA studies were cancelled early due to excessive side effect profiles. Then they rolled these out with immunity for the vaccine manufacturers with no longterm studies behind them (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586287) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:25 AM Author: MASE Live as a Facebook boomer die as a Facebook boomer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49585959) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:36 AM Author: Consuela they'll say that about you and your twitter use one day (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586002) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:42 AM Author: MASE I'm just rephrasing the book of Matthew (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586029) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:38 AM Author: Smoked Double Baked Sweet Potato Skins and Wings (gunneratttt) why can you not consider that he simply thought differently than you rather than "caved?" especially considering he was someone that sacrificed much for his principles.
ive said this before but ill repeat it now that you're trying to turn over a new leaf on not being so negative: if you truly believe the vax is a heart attack jab then you should be *very* sympathetic to the people who fucking died being tricked or coerced into taking it. especially someone like adams who it makes no sense to think he "caved" and thus must have been tricked into drinking poison. |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:39 AM Author: So we looked at the data Purebloods will inherit the earth after the vaxxoids die off and the only legal tender will be physical silver (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586012) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:40 AM Author: Consuela i don't have to feel sympathy for anyone, and in scott adams' case i don't - he never admitted he got tricked (although he was rattled by the accusation), he held himself out as resisting precisely what he caved to, demonstrating public hypocrisy. both of these deserve contempt. i am not trying to be "less negative", i am just divorced now from 95% of the culture war slop. i'm commenting here as a final send off to adams, who xo has discussed with regularity here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586019) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:47 AM Author: Smoked Double Baked Sweet Potato Skins and Wings (gunneratttt) this is incredibly arrogant and myopic. it makes me sad you can't get out of your own way.
ok, let's say for the sake of argument that you are a super genius and have it all figured out. that doesn't change the fact that the average person is 100 IQ, and thus most do not possess the capacity to figure things out in the way you have.
so why would you not feel sympathy towards people that were tricked into harming themselves? of course you don't "have" to feel sympathy for anyone, im asking why you don't.
|
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:48 AM Author: Consuela this is a misread. i do have some sympathy for normal people who were tricked, and especially those who admit they got tricked in retrospect (gibberish tp). i do not have any sympathy for public figures who held themselves out as resisting herd mentality who fell for it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586046) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:55 AM Author: Smoked Double Baked Sweet Potato Skins and Wings (gunneratttt) why does a public figure deserve no sympathy for being reasonably misled and paying the ultimate price for it but a private individual doesn't? after all, he's famous for doodling comics, so any statements he made about the vaxx would could not be taken as authoratative. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586059) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:06 PM Author: Apathetic prepper private individuals were threatened with job loss, inability to travel or attend family funerals, basically total exile
scott adams is (was) a self-employed millionaire who was free from a lot of that leverage, yet he still caved |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:07 PM Author: Consuela This but also the level of moral responsibility goes up the more influence one has (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586077) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:09 PM Author: Smoked Double Baked Sweet Potato Skins and Wings (gunneratttt) i'm asking you to consider the possibility that he didn't cave, but was reasonably mistaken, especially since for reasons you've already said there was little leverage that could have coerced him to cave.
edit: thought this was consuela but since he evaded the Q this still is unanswered |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:14 PM Author: Consuela We are going in circles. Him being fooled makes him a target for contempt because he held himself out as being resistant to such lies or coercion - he even wrote books on the subject - and being a public figure who influences others increases moral responsibility. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586099) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:22 PM Author: Smoked Double Baked Sweet Potato Skins and Wings (gunneratttt) Moral responsibility to what, never be reasonably mistaken? That's not a standard anyone can be held to as everyone is wrong sometimes even when when they're diligently and intelligently trying their best to be correct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586128) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:24 PM Author: Consuela To not be “mistaken” on the core issue you hold out yourself to the public for, yes. He situated himself as the “master of public persuasion” and as a right wing populist. Or if you are “mistaken” on your core issue, at least to own the mistake. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586138) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:33 PM Author: Smoked Double Baked Sweet Potato Skins and Wings (gunneratttt) He likely died not believing he was mistaken, from your POV tricked into poisoning himself.
If you think it's fair to condemn him for being fallible, as all humans are, that's your prerogative. I think that's unreasonable and heartless. Especially when they've already paid the ultimate price for it. You yourself claim to revise your theories when they've been incorrect, and I doubt even you would claim that everything you've published will be proven to be 100% correct. |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:43 PM Author: Consuela I am fallible, but I don’t hold myself out as an expert, merely as a guy undergoing a journey. And I do try to own my mistakes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586220) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:54 PM Author: Smoked Double Baked Sweet Potato Skins and Wings (gunneratttt) I won't belabor this further but that isn't responsive to how it's by definition unfair to hold someone to an impossible standard. If a person is reasonably and intelligently weighing the evidence before publishing it it's unfair to condemn them for being wrong, as this happens to 100% of people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586253) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:39 AM Author: My Pickleball Career Scott Adams fucking sucked. He was a vapid narcissistic arrogant boomer midwit grifter who lied about absolutely everything. The retconning of him as some kind of influential force behind Trump/"the right's" rise is completely bogus
He had zero real "insights" on anything and would always make sure that his "predictions" weren't actually falsifiable so he could lie and say that he actually got it right. The minute that some social issue came along for which the correct answer wasn't blindingly obvious (covid), he got it completely wrong and then in his typical fashion acted outrageously over the top arrogant about it despite being completely fucking wrong
The guy sucked and his gold digger "wife" or "gf" or whatever cucking him after he constantly bragged about her was hilarious and awesome. I'm not gonna spit on his grave because he was still a fellow Internet Nazi but I'm definitely not sad to see him go and honestly I assumed he was lying about his illness for money and attention too |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:42 AM Author: Consuela yeah but he did get cancelled for his boomer culture war goyslop views and he stuck to his guns about it, so i appreciated that part of him (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586031) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:45 AM Author: My Pickleball Career The best thing he ever did was come out explicitly against niggers. That was the only actually "brave" thing that he ever did, because he did it during the Saint Floyd era when that was still utterly verboten
I think he did have some nonzero amount of positive influence on turning things around against niggers by doing that |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:25 PM Author: Yummy Phase Pol Pot Um we use the term "homo erectus" around here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586142) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:44 AM Author: assload Whoa cr friend (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586037) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:52 AM Author: .,..,,.,.,.,.,.,..,.,.,..,.., Scott Adams sacrificed his personal well being to support Trump, and Trumptards turned on him and left him sad and alone in his last days (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586052) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 11:57 AM Author: Louis Poasteur His comic strip work was actually top tier, considering how bad most mainstream comic strips are. He really "got" the ridiculousness of American corporate life.
This led him to a large amount of wealth and recognition, beyond what a person like him would ordinarily have ever had access to. But being a typical boomer, he assumed this meant he was elite in other regards, such as being a political commentator. He had a few strong insights and funny comments, but overall he became mostly just another voice in the crowd.
He absolutely had enough wealth from Dilbert to never come close to worrying about money again, so I don't buy the notion that he was "grifting". I think the most plausible explanation for his internet activities is that he was fundamentally lonely and wanted to connect with people, and his Youtube channel and so forth were an attempt to do exactly that.
He took the jab because he's a boomer who deep down trusted the system more than he was suspicious of it. His suspicion of the establishment was exaggerated for performative reasons. During his life he gained enormously from the American establishment. His comics satirized the corporate world but didn't challenge or threaten it, nor did he ever mean to. He wanted to sit tangential to the corporate world and profit from critiquing it, not actually topple it, and his readers were probably the very corporate people he was satirizing, who would be the ones to laugh at the ridiculousness of the system. Fundamentally Adams has the same attitude towards the American political system and society as a whole, wanting to critique it but fundamentally trusting in it deep down, and seeing suspicion of the system as an attention-worthy deviation from the norm, rather than being the default to begin with. |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:03 PM Author: Yummy Phase Pol Pot Very powerful poast. tyft (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586067) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:11 PM Author: Yummy Phase Pol Pot "His comics satirized the corporate world but didn't challenge or threaten it, nor did he ever mean to. He wanted to sit tangential to the corporate world and profit from critiquing it, not actually topple it, and his readers were probably the very corporate people he was satirizing, who would be the ones to laugh at the ridiculousness of the system. Fundamentally Adams has the same attitude towards the American political system and society as a whole, wanting to critique it but fundamentally trusting in it deep down, and seeing suspicion of the system as an attention-worthy deviation from the norm, rather than being the default to begin with."
Worth highlighting this section alone. Many, many, many such cases. People want to get brownie points (and money) for critique, but are afraid of what's actually necessary for change. Thus becoming part of the very system they claim to oppose.
Many such cases. |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:14 PM Author: Consuela (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586101) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:15 PM Author: Yummy Phase Pol Pot Do you think anyone of note is currently genuinely challenging The System? I feel like you'll have a take. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586106) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:22 PM Author: Consuela I like Owen Benjamin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586127) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:24 PM Author: Yummy Phase Pol Pot Not sure I'd say he is "of note." He is "literally who?" to 99%+ of people.
I'm sure you'll disagree because you are blackpill king, but I think Fuentes genuinely is. |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:25 PM Author: Consuela Fuentes is a controlled federal asset
One does not get highlighted by the system, period, without being controlled. No exceptions
Benjamin is not “of note” to you because he was cancelled for going off script |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:34 PM Author: Yummy Phase Pol Pot I don't buy the idea that Fuentes is controlled at all. If anything, the left / mainstream media will highlight him only to try and split the GOP because they see it as a gain for the left. But the idea that he is controlled is retarded, I'm sorry. Not to mention a decent number of people on the left are happy to have someone more toxic than them bring the jewish issue to the forefront.
Andrew Anglin would be a much better answer than fucking Owen Benjamin, come on man. Though it looks like Anglin's website is now down permanently. |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:36 PM Author: Consuela We don’t have to agree on Fuentes, it’s fine. I did a deep dive into the structure of how influencers are curated and I feel confident in my diagnosis. Yes, Anglin is also not controlled and I like him to an extent . Hopefully his website returns soon (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586191) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:38 PM Author: Yummy Phase Pol Pot Totally fair. I enjoy your posts and occasionally read your substack. I think you also have posted about the fact that the only way to really deal with this crap is to walk away (as much as one can.) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586200) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:50 PM Author: Consuela To walk away from the current thing, yes, because the upper elites control the noetic commons - ie they pick the topics of discussion and they don’t really care what position you take so long as you accept the issue and their framing itself
It’s better to focus on what we can control and impact in our own lives |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:37 PM Author: Louis Poasteur tyvm! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586198) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:06 PM Author: Consuela (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586075) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:04 PM Author: Marshall W. Waller Does his teenage Asian wife get everything? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586069) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:05 PM Author: Consuela He had a 20s social media grifter wife for a bit but they got divorced. He wasn’t married when he died afaik (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586071) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:05 PM Author: I do bite my thumb, sir Lucky bastard. Where is MY fortuitous ass cancer? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586072) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:07 PM Author: Consuela It was prostate or pancreas cancer not rectal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586080) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:18 PM Author: average/ordinary/typical citizen/person Sorry he died but don't really get his online persona arc that happened. Because he was talking about Trump's persuasion style or something back in 2016 and he was an early Trumpmo, that made him right wing famous online until he turned pro vax? That's how I vaguely remember it but don't understand his higher profile beyond being Dilbert guy which I assume he was for decades until something changed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586108) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:23 PM Author: Consuela They cancelled his dilbert comics for talking about black crime (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586130) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:52 PM Author: average/ordinary/typical citizen/person Yea I remember he tweeted that but he was already on different clips I saw on the internet really focused on Trump's language amd persuasion style. I thought it was retarded at the time and still do but he was early to call Trump winning 16 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586245) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:55 PM Author: Consuela Yes he was early on the Trump train and got a lot of flack for it, and this was commendable (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586256) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:28 PM Author: Apathetic prepper he dressed up anodyne political takes with a degree of pseudo-intellectualism that let him ride a wave of early trump boomerism, subsequently misreading the room and embarrassing himself with his pro vax stance
the absurdity is how unnecessary it was given he already had it made. he thrust himself into the spotlight and spent his twilight years shouting inoffensive political takes into the void alongside other bandwagon grifters like "the quartering" who do it out of necessity |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:29 PM Author: Consuela (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586156) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:36 PM Author: My Pickleball Career (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586193) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:42 PM Author: cowgod (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586214) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 12:43 PM Author: Fyre festival founder He seemed like a legitimately good dude. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586219) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 1:01 PM Author: fully online and responsive Thanks, I was really hoping to read consuela's thoughts on this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586285) |
|
Date: January 13th, 2026 1:03 PM Author: Consuela (Scott Adams’s wife…errr, no… Scott Adams’s children… er, no… Scott Adams’s family …. errr, no…) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5821487&forum_id=2#49586294) |