XO POLL: Moast Intelligent Human Being Known In Human Hi$tory?
| 180 boltzmann | 07/04/25 | | Garnet vigorous nowag home | 07/04/25 | | Duck-like Aphrodisiac Piazza Stain | 07/04/25 | | Cobalt stubborn institution messiness | 07/04/25 | | 180 boltzmann | 07/04/25 | | razzle-dazzle tattoo | 07/04/25 | | Garnet vigorous nowag home | 07/04/25 | | razzle-dazzle tattoo | 07/04/25 | | Garnet vigorous nowag home | 07/04/25 | | razzle-dazzle tattoo | 07/04/25 | | Garnet vigorous nowag home | 07/05/25 | | 180 boltzmann | 07/05/25 | | federal theater | 07/05/25 | | 180 boltzmann | 07/06/25 | | federal theater | 07/05/25 | | 180 boltzmann | 07/05/25 | | federal theater | 07/06/25 | | racy bistre puppy black woman | 07/06/25 | | laughsome azure den | 07/05/25 | | dashing abode pistol | 07/06/25 | | laughsome azure den | 07/06/25 | | razzle-dazzle tattoo | 07/06/25 | | laughsome azure den | 07/06/25 | | razzle-dazzle tattoo | 07/06/25 | | demanding shrine | 07/05/25 | | Black hospital | 07/06/25 | | Territorial big-titted kitchen | 07/05/25 | | Chestnut Newt Public Bath | 07/06/25 | | razzle-dazzle tattoo | 07/06/25 | | Concupiscible property | 07/06/25 | | razzle-dazzle tattoo | 07/06/25 | | slippery genital piercing dragon | 07/06/25 | | 180 boltzmann | 07/06/25 | | 180 boltzmann | 07/06/25 | | 180 boltzmann | 07/06/25 | | racy bistre puppy black woman | 07/06/25 | | 180 boltzmann | 07/06/25 | | dashing abode pistol | 07/06/25 | | 180 boltzmann | 07/06/25 | | Concupiscible property | 07/06/25 | | Black hospital | 07/06/25 | | razzle-dazzle tattoo | 07/06/25 | | Cracking shaky striped hyena mother | 07/06/25 | | Tantric salmon queen of the night | 07/06/25 | | Fear-inspiring stead pocket flask | 07/06/25 | | Tantric salmon queen of the night | 07/06/25 | | Domesticated narrow-minded senate toaster | 07/06/25 | | laughsome azure den | 07/06/25 | | Cream doobsian heaven boistinker | 07/06/25 | | 180 boltzmann | 02/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:09 PM Author: razzle-dazzle tattoo
Past, I'm sticking with Feynman.
Present, my vote goes to Penrose.
We don't have sufficient information to speak to the majority of mankind, so it's really not a meaningful question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49072538) |
 |
Date: July 4th, 2025 6:24 PM Author: razzle-dazzle tattoo
Can we really speak to ancient peoples? So little of their work and others' views of them is extant. Their popularity and contributions may be more a function of momentum than objective truths... just look at any old religious book.
I'd argue even the likes of Newton or Leibniz are too old to speak of in the same way as modern people.
I actually don't know much about Witten. I bet most scientists don't have Feynman's charisma & ability to communicate, though. (Just flip through anything Penrose has written.)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49072579) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:33 PM Author: razzle-dazzle tattoo
A lot of writings (and the history of people) have been lost over the past 2.5k years.
There were also great contributions from India & the far East in classical & medieval times that most of us aren't aware of. (How many of us could name the author of Al-Jabr, let alone read it?)
We can speak of those the knowledge of whom is extant, or has been translated into our native language, but not so much to the 'most intelligent person ever.'
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49076775) |
 |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:19 PM Author: razzle-dazzle tattoo
Who's to say that the four contributors to QED won't go down as the most intelligent, influential people of the history of the world 2.5k years from now?
I would argue that the most influential individuals aren't necessarily the most intelligent. The further back in time we go, the more influential an individual becomes. Some kid in 2021 with a wacky GUT hasn't had 2.5k years to gain the infamy of a Plato.
Besides, could Plato even handle UG physics at CalTech today? (Conversely, could a CalTech grad today do what Plato did c. 500 BCE?)
Obviously, OP's question has no absolute answer, but it's still fun to argue.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49077202) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 12:10 AM Author: Chestnut Newt Public Bath
I think it has to be Newton, for coming up with calculus + figuring out all the aspects of practical physics.
The only other contender is Einstein, who on 2 occasions figured out things in physics that don't make intuitive sense at all.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49075462) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 7:26 AM Author: racy bistre puppy black woman
Short list:
Tesla, Newton, Da Vinci, Plato
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49075746) |
Date: July 6th, 2025 4:51 PM Author: Black hospital
Jansci von Nuemann
As much as I hate to nominate a turd, Ramanujan is easily a top contender
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5746210&forum_id=2#49076800) |
|
|