The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Will AI end OnlyFans?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:05 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979645) |
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:26 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin And porn in general? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979680) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:28 PM Author: Slate parlor Will it end Jews? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979681) |
 |
Date: June 2nd, 2025 12:24 PM Author: razzle-dazzle pisswyrm AI is actually 10,000 Jews in a large office complex in Tel Aviv giving you woke answers to your queries. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48980816) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:29 PM Author: Excitant headpube Nah people like real content and will continue to pay a premium for it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979684) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:32 PM Author: Aphrodisiac topaz double fault Won’t know the difference soon (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979691) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:34 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin Step 1: you can't tell the difference Step 2: you can tell the difference because real girls suck |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:42 PM Author: Excitant headpube There will be ways to “verify” content as real. People will pay for the verification (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979712) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:46 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin There will not be ways to "verify" that cannot be defeated by AI- not reliably enough, anyway, for people to pay for the "real stuff" over AI shit which will literally be better anyway. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979725) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:52 PM Author: Excitant headpube There’s pretty easy stuff you can do like signing content with crypto or whatever. And then the person controlling the crypto can be verified against their passport. Then you know it’s a real person that signed the content. But you’re right they could still sign AI content.
What I imagine will happen is that content will be signed at time of creation. Apple will probably offer this as a service on iPhones |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:57 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin "But you’re right they could still sign AI content" That's what I was getting at. Re. Apple's service you concoct. Eventually there will be a workaround for this as well. Where this is all heading is that the methods to verify Real over AI will get increasingly complicated, while its benefits get vanishingly small, that it will not be available. |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 10:18 PM Author: Excitant headpube I don’t think it will be all that hard. Apple will have a tamper proof system to stamp content made on its phones. Content is watched on browsers or apps that run through app stores and apple standards. Those apps and browsers will be trained to trust that content as real. AI porn will be huge but the demand for the real stuff will never go away and will probably come with a huge premium. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979805) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 10:21 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin A huge premium? Maybe for people who remember what "normal girls" were like. (Even today, by the way, no one does.) I wrote this below: AI will be superior anyway, and to the extent that "IRL flaws" are perceived as sexier or otherwise more desirable, AI will imitate them sufficiently to fool you. Ultimately, your AI-addled brain will not be able to recall the hallmarks of "real girls"- nevermind that most zoomers and younger already are unfamiliar enough with women to understand these flaws and irregularities of real-life sexual interaction.
|
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:46 PM Author: Hot university Most people will notice when the woman giving a HJ has six fingers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979727) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:47 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin LMAO that people still believe these glitches will not be resolved (probably already have, albeit maybe on platforms not accessible to you) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979731) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:49 PM Author: bisexual wine abode telephone that would be so hot. That extra finger curled around your VR dong (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979734) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 9:54 PM Author: pearl theater stage It’ll move more of the action back to IRL shows/strippers/prostitution. Porn is based on debasing real women, though, so there’s no significant demand for AI porn.
Legacy porn from the pre-AI era will become more valued (this is already what’s happened among CP freaks: almost all child porn is ancient; simulated CP is legal, but the freaks have no interest in it). |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 10:00 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin Porn isn't the only thing that will go back to IRL. The same will happen with dating, where literally nothing on a dating profile can be trusted. The same will happen with job applications (as another poaster has pointed out is already happening at his firm and the resumes thay are sent). And eventually the same will happen with all forms of electronic communication. It will all, all go away. Everything will go back to IRL and frankly the internet will cease to be. |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 10:03 PM Author: pearl theater stage It will have turned out to be a pretty sad and stupid and embarrassing little blip of history.
Social media in particular will be the “yeah, I wore an olive green polyester leisure suit with 17-in. diameter bell bottoms back in the 70s… we all did” of our generation. |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 10:22 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin I'm pleasantly surprised to see you endorse this point of view. You're not a megapoaster so Im not all that familiar but iirc you're one of the smartest poasters (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979816) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 10:01 PM Author: Haunting institution persian Right idea but the wrong product.
Onlyfans will survive because its real girls, girl next door, innocent shit that the chicks at least act like they enjoy doing. Take Livvy Dunne - she's hugely popular not because she's some perfect model - she's popular because she's an athlete with a cute personality who talks like a real college girl.
AI is going to end porn. Are guys going to want to watch some porn star fake orgasm with some sketchy looking guy she met 5 minutes ago? Or are they going to put on their VR headseat and say "make a video of Hermione in her Hogswarts uniform telling me that i have a bigger dick than my ex's new boyfriend" |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 10:05 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin Thanks for compliment of Right Idea, but actually it applies to all products- not just OF and porn. Again. You're not looking at two options in front of you where you click one button for Real Girls and one button for AI Girls. You're looking at one button for AI Girls and one button for "Girl who says she's real but you have no fucking clue if she is or isn't." AI will be superior anyway, and to the extent that "IRL flaws" are perceived as sexier or otherwise more desirable, AI will imitate them sufficiently to fool you. Ultimately, your AI-addled brain will not be able to recall the hallmarks of "real girls"- nevermind that most zoomers and younger already are unfamiliar enough with women to understand these flaws and irregularities of real-life sexual interaction. The question is, what systems will AI and AI-caused "Reality Skepticism" not affect? What will be left after all this? I'm suggesting that technology will completely cannibalize itself, and I'm far from the first or smartest person to have said this. |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 10:29 PM Author: pearl theater stage I've been engaging your OP on (what is clearly) your premise that the technology will continue to improve to, practically speaking, perfection, but also a decent chance this continues to be something where retarded boomers (and maybe on this gen-xers) get fooled, while those who came up with the technology laugh at the retarded 46 year old who can't tell that all of belle delphin's videos over the past year are AI because the real belle gained 40 lbs. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979834) |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 10:35 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin What is the basis for the premise that it will not continue to improve? Also I think the state of things is actually far more advance than the end-consumer realizes, just like with all tech products. The shit available to the public is years behind what the people on top have made/access to. Also what is your opinion? Your two poasts above itt seem to go different ways. |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 11:26 PM Author: pearl theater stage There's reason to be skeptical given how hard, and how crucial, getting the last little bit (from 98% to 100%) of perfection is. Plenty of tech never gets there; some shit's still 60% useful at 95% accuracy; other shit is worthless until it hits 99.9%. Obviously, AI videos designed to lastingly deceive fall firmly into the latter category.
But I do think your point about how facsimile tech becoming indistinguishable from genuine tech will largely just render the genuine tech useless. This may end up being the solution to the surveillance state: no one will give a fuck about a network of street cameras watching you go from the scene of the crime back to your apartment when defense counsel can mock up identical videos of the case agent, judge, and juror #4 committing the crime and doing the exact same return route. |
|
Date: June 1st, 2025 10:10 PM Author: ebony diverse stead I've yet to see a single decent AI porn scene. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48979775) |
|
Date: June 2nd, 2025 12:23 PM Author: Racy slimy turdskin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5732320&forum_id=2#48980810) |