Trump/Habba pwned by Aileen Cannon’s special counsel ruling
| Vivacious ocher forum round eye | 07/31/25 | | .,.,.;.,..,.,:.,:,.,..,::,..,,:.,.,.:,..:.,:.:, | 08/21/25 | | https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 08/22/25 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 08/22/25 | | dave blunts | 08/22/25 | | Can an HSA pay for Hair Transplants? | 08/22/25 | | .,.,.;.,..,.,:.,:,.,..,::,..,,:.,.,.:,..:.,:.:, | 08/22/25 | | ...,....,,........ | 08/22/25 | | """'"'"""'' | 08/22/25 | | ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, | 08/22/25 | | """'"'"""'' | 08/22/25 | | """'"'"""'' | 08/22/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 31st, 2025 11:13 AM Author: Vivacious ocher forum round eye
Pretty sound argument actually…
“The defendant, Julien Giraud Jr., argues that the Trump appointee’s bombshell ruling last summer dismissing a federal criminal case against Trump by finding that special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional applies equally to Trump’s temporary U.S. attorney pick, Alina Habba.
Giraud’s attorney Thomas Mirigliano says the workaround Trump used to keep Habba in place after a 120-day interim appointment expired directly conflicts with Cannon’s ruling.
“As Judge Cannon explained in Trump, when executive officials deliberately engineer an appointment in violation of statutory and constitutional mandates, the only effective remedy is dismissal or, at the very least, disqualification of the unconstitutionally appointed officer and her subordinates,” Mirigliano wrote in a filing Wednesday.
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/31/alina-habba-aileen-cannon-us-attorney-00486598
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756662&forum_id=2#49145285) |
Date: August 21st, 2025 4:39 PM
Author: .,.,.;.,..,.,:.,:,.,..,::,..,,:.,.,.:,..:.,:.:,
lol it worked
https://x.com/annabower/status/1958610842557071569?s=46
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756662&forum_id=2#49201420) |
 |
Date: August 22nd, 2025 8:53 AM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
full op
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.njd.557842/gov.uscourts.njd.557842.144.0.pdf
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756662&forum_id=2#49203497) |
 |
Date: August 22nd, 2025 10:38 AM
Author: .,.,.;.,..,.,:.,:,.,..,::,..,,:.,.,.:,..:.,:.:,
The D in that case certainly does. Same argument would apply equally to anyone else who’s been prosecuted during her unconstitutional tenure
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756662&forum_id=2#49203687) |
 |
Date: August 22nd, 2025 11:24 AM
Author: ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
i know that if the defense counsel isn't really a lawyer then the defendant gets a new trial.
why would a defendant get a new trial because the top dog, an actual lawyer, isn't properly appointed? serious question.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5756662&forum_id=2#49203792) |
|
|