Has "calories in / calories out" been DEBUNKED?
| Cocky university | 12/18/22 | | Thirsty Dark Theater Stage | 12/18/22 | | irradiated flirting brunch people who are hurt | 12/21/22 | | comical theater volcanic crater | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | comical theater volcanic crater | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Motley wrinkle | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Motley wrinkle | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Motley wrinkle | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Motley wrinkle | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/19/22 | | ebony fighting menage | 12/18/22 | | overrated sickened background story business firm | 12/18/22 | | adventurous cordovan indian lodge | 12/18/22 | | Maniacal Crystalline Double Fault | 12/18/22 | | adventurous cordovan indian lodge | 12/18/22 | | Maniacal Crystalline Double Fault | 12/18/22 | | adventurous cordovan indian lodge | 12/18/22 | | Maniacal Crystalline Double Fault | 12/18/22 | | adventurous cordovan indian lodge | 12/18/22 | | Maniacal Crystalline Double Fault | 12/18/22 | | adventurous cordovan indian lodge | 12/18/22 | | Maniacal Crystalline Double Fault | 12/18/22 | | adventurous cordovan indian lodge | 12/18/22 | | Maniacal Crystalline Double Fault | 12/18/22 | | Heady location | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Laughsome school foreskin | 12/18/22 | | sapphire hairless roommate hospital | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | ebony fighting menage | 12/18/22 | | thriller hateful native | 12/19/22 | | Histrionic haunting lay | 12/18/22 | | Heady location | 12/18/22 | | Maniacal Crystalline Double Fault | 12/18/22 | | Motley wrinkle | 12/18/22 | | Heady location | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Motley wrinkle | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Motley wrinkle | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Motley wrinkle | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Motley wrinkle | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Crimson space | 12/18/22 | | Motley wrinkle | 12/18/22 | | glittery chad | 12/19/22 | | Crimson space | 12/19/22 | | glittery chad | 12/20/22 | | glittery chad | 12/18/22 | | glittery chad | 12/18/22 | | brilliant racy gaming laptop | 12/18/22 | | Cocky university | 12/19/22 | | Charismatic splenetic deer antler home | 12/18/22 | | Charismatic splenetic deer antler home | 12/18/22 | | violet knife tanning salon | 12/19/22 | | thriller hateful native | 12/19/22 | | Stirring aggressive halford prole | 12/19/22 | | violet knife tanning salon | 12/19/22 | | Stirring aggressive halford prole | 12/19/22 | | glittery chad | 12/21/22 | | Crimson space | 12/21/22 | | Stirring aggressive halford prole | 12/21/22 | | misunderstood lilac locus | 12/19/22 | | multi-colored national security agency therapy | 12/19/22 | | 180 mental disorder dragon | 12/21/22 | | 180 mental disorder dragon | 12/21/22 | | zombie-like parlor indirect expression | 12/21/22 | | ungodly national sneaky criminal | 07/05/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: December 18th, 2022 9:21 PM Author: Motley wrinkle
Oh come on, man. While I generally agree with your statements about some vegetable/seed oils, the highly processed fats found in industrialized baked goods like Oreos are uniquely bad for you.
Until about 10 years ago, almost all the fats found in Oreos were partially hydrogenated, producing trans fats (which could be labeled as unsaturated fats even though they behaved like saturated fats) via trans-cis isomerism. Since trans fats have been banned, industrial food-oil producers have turned to fat interestification to create triglycerides that would not be found in the sources the oils are derived from. Early looks at interestified fats seem to show they seem to promote inflammation and adipose tissue growth.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30813339/
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2#45653145) |
 |
Date: December 18th, 2022 9:26 PM Author: Crimson space
ctrl + f "mice"
shut the fuck up
show me HUMAN OUTCOME DATA that demonstrates "seed oils" are bad for you
EVERYTHING with human outcome data demonstrates they're health-promoting when consumed in isolation (not wrapped up on junk food) when replacing saturated fat
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2#45653156) |
 |
Date: December 18th, 2022 8:16 PM Author: adventurous cordovan indian lodge
1. It doesn’t mean that as the term is used, otherwise it would be a useless term.
2. No they aren’t, as I just explained. Controlled trials where subjects were fed different diets assigned to them.
The study shows the impact on weight gain that different diets have even if the calories are the exact same. This means that determining whether a diet is advantageous based purely on its caloric content is faulty.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2#45652850) |
Date: December 18th, 2022 8:30 PM Author: Motley wrinkle
As a broad approximation CICO is correct, but it ignores things like the thermic effect of food, insulin response, meal timing, and the impact of a whole slew of other hormones on body composition.
CICO will keep you in a normal BMI, but you’ll never really get cut with it unless you get lucky
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2#45652911) |
Date: December 18th, 2022 11:03 PM Author: Charismatic splenetic deer antler home
The calories in, calories out argument is pretty stupid.
Yeah, obviously the more of something you eat, the more calories you consume, the more likely you are to gain weight.
But it should be even more obvious that it can't *only* be calories in calories out. It should be evident to even a 5 year old that your body isn't going to process eating ice cream every day vs gorging yourself in one sitting, or drinking sugar water vs celery, in the same way. Plus, everyone shits and everyone shits differently.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2#45653663) |
 |
Date: December 21st, 2022 4:27 PM Author: glittery chad
This is because corn is highly bio-unavailable, due to how dense the cellulose is.
"100 calories" of corn will not be metabolized the same as 100 calories of sweet potatoes, despite both being complex carbs, due to bioavailability. Moreover, 100 calories of simple carbs will not be digested the same as 100 calories of fats; depending on insulin levels at time of consuming either, you will have radically different rates of metabolism (or fat storage).
Running a caloric deficit is a necessary but insufficient condition for optimal fat loss.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2#45670256) |
Date: December 19th, 2022 3:14 PM Author: multi-colored national security agency therapy
thermodynamics has been debunked!
of course it's not so simple as "calories in, calories out" as different calories are processed differently by different people. but it is physically impossible to run at a caloric deficit and gain weight.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5255189&forum_id=2#45657025) |
|
|