Real Q for lawmos: why don't you just do 100% race/gender based voir dire?
| Gloostick | 09/04/26 | | VoteRepublican | 09/04/26 | | husbando | 09/04/26 | | Gloostick | 09/04/26 | | husbando | 09/04/26 | | robe nigger | 09/04/26 | | Gloostick | 09/04/26 | | robe nigger | 09/04/26 | | coolgod | 09/04/26 | | Michael Stonebreaker | 09/04/26 | | the walter white of this generation (walt jr.) | 09/04/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:49 PM Author: Gloostick
and don't say "it's not allowed!!" who gives a shit
like this clancy thing should just be both sides trying to kick out as many women or men as possible
white kid murdered by a nigger = try to boot every nigger you can (or vice versa)
some are more objective but seems like a ton of instances just being racist and sexist is a far more effective heuristic than whatever bullshit else you could think of
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2#50116785) |
Date: September 4th, 2026 9:59 PM Author: Michael Stonebreaker
this is the near future.
juries filled with murderously racially resentful 90IQ foreign-born nons presided over by dreadlocked 93IQ judges.
diversity is our strength.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2#50116798) |
Date: September 4th, 2026 10:06 PM Author: the walter white of this generation (walt jr.)
It's like 75% that. You wouldn't think you'd need 25% for other shit but you'd be shocked how many people come in and say that (e.g.) millionaires who are accused of committing tax evasion are all guilty of tons of other shit too and deserve to be hanged in the street.
But you can't realistically get an all-woman jury; I've tried a couple times and didn't even get close (and on the most prominent example I can think of they elected one of the 3 women to be foreman and she totally hung my guy). You also can't get a "young" jury.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5900758&forum_id=2#50116807) |
|
|