Criminal appeals lawyer taking some Q's.
| bipolar place of business cumskin | 06/11/26 | | Opaque ratface | 06/11/26 | | bipolar place of business cumskin | 06/11/26 | | Opaque ratface | 06/11/26 | | bipolar place of business cumskin | 06/11/26 | | Opaque ratface | 06/11/26 | | bipolar place of business cumskin | 06/11/26 | | obsidian boiling water | 06/11/26 | | bipolar place of business cumskin | 06/11/26 | | obsidian boiling water | 06/12/26 | | Olive Comical Heaven | 06/11/26 | | bipolar place of business cumskin | 06/11/26 | | Olive Comical Heaven | 06/11/26 | | bipolar place of business cumskin | 06/11/26 | | Olive Comical Heaven | 06/11/26 | | bipolar place of business cumskin | 06/11/26 | | Vengeful Office Travel Guidebook | 06/11/26 | | avocado site | 06/11/26 | | bipolar place of business cumskin | 06/12/26 | | Indigo Hot Cruise Ship Pervert | 06/12/26 | | bipolar place of business cumskin | 06/12/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: June 11th, 2026 3:40 PM Author: bipolar place of business cumskin
It's very chill, except all the administrative bullshit is a headache.
Client comms are annoying --- scanning their letters, printing out my letters and filed briefs for them, putting them in envelopes and stamping them, writing letters to them explaining that their proposed issues are stupid.
And then the CA courts are stuck in the 80s. For all the talk of AI, half the courts are still sending out transcripts in paper form. Scanning in records is a colossal waste of time.
And then there's all the claims/billing crap.
All the other stuff is annoying. But the actual legal work is really 180
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873176&forum_id=2#49931294) |
 |
Date: June 12th, 2026 7:13 PM Author: bipolar place of business cumskin
Barring rare exceptions,* they're all guilty of something. Doesn't mean they're not grossly overcharged, an idiot stattte court trial judge didn't make some big legal error or make a technical mistake in the calculation of sentencing, or the scum prosecutor didn't cheat, or certain counts weren't properly proven.
Exceptional cases I've had: a he said / she said date rape case between two high school kids and the girl thought she was pregnant and cried rape after... a couple true self-defense cases where an aggressive DA wanted to prosecute someone just because you have a dead guy, and the jury splits the baby and comes back with manslaughter instead of murder just because they also feel obligated to punish someone for a dead guy.
I really can only think of 2-3 cases where the guy wasn't actually "guilty."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873176&forum_id=2#49934592) |
|
|