\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Not a lawyer but why "turn over" incriminating shit during "discovery"?

The other side doesn't have it and doesn't know it exists, j...
primrose 180 rehab roast beef
  07/02/25
any big enough law firm is going to require that it have acc...
Glassy Vivacious Market
  07/02/25
Ok hide it and then if the opposition somehow finds it you c...
primrose 180 rehab roast beef
  07/02/25
ome weird trick
pink marvelous trailer park
  07/02/25
winning isn't winning if it costs you your law license edit...
brass lay
  07/02/25
lol at it ever costing you your law license. Worst case is m...
slate maniacal windowlicker spot
  07/02/25
Enjoy hell.
Hairraiser spruce stag film
  07/02/25
This is why associates have a "bad docs" tag -- th...
tripping brunch associate
  07/02/25
"hot docs"
Glassy Vivacious Market
  07/02/25
"i don't think this document is even responsive!"
stimulating reading party school
  07/02/25
...
Nudist codepig
  07/02/25
Technically, it's not incriminating if it's not produced.
Passionate Aggressive Church
  07/02/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:08 PM
Author: primrose 180 rehab roast beef

The other side doesn't have it and doesn't know it exists, just don't give them the incriminating shit lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066970)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:10 PM
Author: Glassy Vivacious Market

any big enough law firm is going to require that it have access to the clients files and will run search terms, etc. no point in an attorney refusing to turn it over even if the client doesn't want to. and theres going to be some degree of discovery on discovery/preservation efforts made. on a smaller level im sure it happens all the time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066974)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:14 PM
Author: primrose 180 rehab roast beef

Ok hide it and then if the opposition somehow finds it you can play dumb and in that case ur furked anyway so game theory says ur best bet is to not voluntarily hand it over

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066988)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:10 PM
Author: pink marvelous trailer park

ome weird trick

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49066975)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:26 PM
Author: brass lay

winning isn't winning if it costs you your law license

edit. i might have to rethink this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067008)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:42 PM
Author: slate maniacal windowlicker spot

lol at it ever costing you your law license. Worst case is maybe getting your complaint/answer struck but that would be after multiple orders.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067042)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:43 PM
Author: Hairraiser spruce stag film

Enjoy hell.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067043)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 5:55 PM
Author: tripping brunch associate

This is why associates have a "bad docs" tag -- those are collected and sent to the partners so they can brainstorm reasons not to produce them, while the other 2 million pages of trash get produced.

The associates can later say they tagged it for further review and the partners can say "I thought this already got produced" if it ever surfaces through a third party or whatever.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067066)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:04 PM
Author: Glassy Vivacious Market

"hot docs"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067246)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:05 PM
Author: stimulating reading party school

"i don't think this document is even responsive!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067249)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:23 PM
Author: Nudist codepig



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067291)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 2nd, 2025 7:35 PM
Author: Passionate Aggressive Church

Technically, it's not incriminating if it's not produced.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5745409&forum_id=2#49067318)