\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Airdrop

SCOTUS takes up another anti-Asian AA case

SCOTUSblog @SCOTUSblog The court will hear argument earl...
internet-worthy cruel-hearted double fault library
  10/19/26
Is this jjc
Genius Bear on the loose in Japan
  10/19/26
good but they need to rule against legacies as just AA for b...
Swashbuckling Laser Beams Jap
  10/19/26
hmm. this could be a reverse willy case. the question ac...
internet-worthy cruel-hearted double fault library
  10/19/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply

Date: October 19th, 2026 12:33 PM
Author: internet-worthy cruel-hearted double fault library

SCOTUSblog

@SCOTUSblog

The court will hear argument early next year in a challenge to the process that a Maryland county uses to determine who will be admitted to a group of highly selective public magnet schools.

https://x.com/SCOTUSblog/status/2112202655925985289

====

look at how the MSM frames it: Asians are against boosting Black and Latino enrollment. those Asians!

Supreme Court to hear a new case on race and school admissions, this time in Maryland

Plaintiffs allege that the admissions policy for magnet middle schools in Montgomery County is unlawfully aimed at boosting Black and Latino enrollment.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/supreme-court-hear-new-case-race-school-admissions-time-maryland-rcna604328

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5913931&forum_id=2#50196697)



Reply

Date: October 19th, 2026 12:37 PM
Author: Genius Bear on the loose in Japan

Is this jjc

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5913931&forum_id=2#50196703)



Reply

Date: October 19th, 2026 12:38 PM
Author: Swashbuckling Laser Beams Jap

good but they need to rule against legacies as just AA for birdshits

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5913931&forum_id=2#50196705)



Reply

Date: October 19th, 2026 4:29 PM
Author: internet-worthy cruel-hearted double fault library

hmm. this could be a reverse willy case.

the question accepted is that given a facially neutral policy, must the plaintiff complaining of racial discrimination prove the case by showing disparate impact.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5913931&forum_id=2#50197017)