Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??
| scarlet legend principal's office | 12/08/25 | | french pisswyrm | 12/08/25 | | curious voyeur | 12/08/25 | | scarlet legend principal's office | 12/08/25 | | aromatic white mexican | 12/08/25 | | scarlet legend principal's office | 12/08/25 | | aromatic white mexican | 12/08/25 | | Pontificating community account | 12/09/25 | | passionate national | 12/09/25 | | Drab Racy Theater Digit Ratio | 12/09/25 | | Biglaw partner throwin' ya some overtime | 06/18/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM Author: scarlet legend principal's office
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]
Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?
How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2...id#49495681) |
|
|