Cons could have easily used this platform to skewer the retarded libshit paint by numbers shrinks and their pill pushing medication industry overlords but no, they had to go all in on durrr mental health isn't real and you can't just kill your kids because you don't feel like being a mom. Women evading accountability yet again!

If anyone had bothered to watch the trial they would know that the pros is getting their ass beat and that the jury is up to their eyeballs in reasonable doubt.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50094278)

There's only two Clancy megathreads, this one and your other one, and in both 50% of the poasts are you screeding about it. So I really have no idea where you'd get this from since you've been the #1 Clancy commmentator.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50094973)

Reminds me of the “I like to smoke after I fuck someone” guy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50094346)

Problem for the CW is the epic amount of reasonable doubt including the prosecution admitting that either Patrick or Lindsay is lying and/or has false memories of the incident.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095850)

It would be interesting to see what would happen in Arkansas. I definitely think there are some JDX where she would fry.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095867)

cons normalize raping kids

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50094471)

I haven't watched any of this shit or looked into it because I don't want to listen to people who "saw this one thing on tik tok."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50094847)

I watched nearly every day of Lindsay Clancy trial and I think 80/20 she's found NGBI. Small chance the jury simply hates her and finds her reprehensible on every level. But mountains of reasonable doubt at this point.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50094849)

No idea that the state's own expert testified Lindsay had Bipolar Type 2 and that no one should have prescribed her an SSRI? Sounds like you're not following the case much. Nothing "TikTok" about watching a witness on the stand, bud.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50094905)

You're right I'm not following the case much -- the comment you're responded to makes that explicit. That's why I'm confused why you think I've weighed in on it at all.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50094911)

Another prosecution expert agreed with the defense expert on the defense theory for motive: altruistic filicide. The prosecution theory has fully merged with the defense theory.

The prosecution is dunn hurr.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095089)

The defense expert of Dahmer and Unabomber trial fame admitted she knew what she was doing was wrong but that due to psychotic command hallucinations she was unable to comport herself in accordance to the law.

Altruistic suicide was brought up by this defense witness as the motive. It was later offered by the prosecution witness, at which point the two sides converged on motive but differed on criminal responsibility.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095645)

https://www.mass.gov/doc/9200-lack-of-criminal-responsibility/download

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095697)

to conform their conduct to the requirements of the law.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095740)

1) WRONGFULNESS

OR

2) CRIMINALITY AND CONFORM TO THE LAW

There are not the same, hence why it's peppered with "either" and "or." The ability to conform element just means that even if you know it's illegal you're not responsible if you have an irrestible impulse and can't conform.

I don't understand what you mean by merge anyway. Experts can have different opinions but the result can be the same. If half the jury believed she knew it was wrong and half believed she didn't but knew it was illegal and could control herself, she's responsible. Wtf is the significance of "merger?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095793)

I just don't want to argue for 400 years. I know I'm right and there's no sense in debating. Where do you find the time to get this worked up? No one else gets half as invested as you do.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095840)

I don't know shit about the case, but just going by what you wrote that would make me more skeptical, not less.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095095)

Also I know how dense these cases are which is why I'm not saying she is or isn't insane based on poasts ln xo. I'm just saying that in isolation what benzo said could move the need *more* toward sane even though he thinks it's a slam dunk for insane.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095138)

State's expert: "That statement definitely minimizes what happened here"

BOOM GOES THE DYNAMITE

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095594)

https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2023/02/720/405/Lindsay-Clancy-Massachusetts-kids-2.jpg?ve=1&tl=1

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50095716)

Every single person involved should be publicly executed in a football stadium on national television.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5897460&forum_id=2...id#50108693)