*gets called out for believing retarded crank shit*
| Olive property | 08/14/26 | | chartreuse geriatric jewess kitty cat | 08/14/26 | | Olive property | 08/14/26 | | Hairless Orchestra Pit Cumskin | 08/14/26 | | Olive property | 08/14/26 | | Hairless Orchestra Pit Cumskin | 08/14/26 | | Olive property | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | Citrine Provocative Friendly Grandma | 08/14/26 | | Olive property | 08/14/26 | | Citrine Provocative Friendly Grandma | 08/14/26 | | Olive property | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | Olive property | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | lascivious lay | 08/14/26 | | Olive property | 08/14/26 | | lascivious lay | 08/14/26 | | Fiercely-loyal theater stage son of senegal | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | silver native | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | silver native | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | silver native | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | silver native | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | silver native | 08/14/26 | | lascivious lay | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | lascivious lay | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | lascivious lay | 08/14/26 | | Olive property | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | lascivious lay | 08/14/26 | | Pink coffee pot space | 08/14/26 | | Buck-toothed sable boistinker | 08/14/26 | | silver native | 08/14/26 | | aromatic costumed becky | 08/14/26 | | Olive property | 08/14/26 | | aromatic costumed becky | 08/14/26 | | Crystalline station | 08/14/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 2:50 PM Author: Citrine Provocative Friendly Grandma
you’re ridiculous, and you argue poorly.
the notion that “simulation theory” and “just asking questions” about whether life is a computer program is somehow more intellectually respectable than examining anomalies in the moon-landing evidence is absurd.
do you also take the government’s grainy photo propaganda of interstellar UAPs stalking Navy jets at face value? you probably think that's totally real too.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893111&forum_id=2...id.#50068058) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 3:03 PM Author: Olive property
No. You are conflating very different kinds of claims into one bucket labeled “questioning official reality". Simulation hypothesis is speculative metaphysics/philosophy of computation. It doesn't require accusing any particular group of scientists, engineers, or institutions of coordinated fraud. It asks whether our observed physics and consciousness are consistent with being inside a computational process run by some more advanced system. You can take the argument seriously without assigning it a high probability or treating it as settled.
Moon landing hoax claims are different. They require a large scale, multi-decade conspiracy involving NASA, contractors, physical samples, other countries who had every incentive to expose NASA. The claimed “anomalies” have been repeatedly examined and explained by ordinary engineering and physics.
Navy UAP videos are in a third category. It is entirely legitimate to analyze the sensor data to analyze whether the objects (or apparent objects) in the video are genuinely physical objects or anomalous. What isn't legitimate is making the leap to say that since the videos are anomalous that they must be part of some government conspiracy to cover up alien craft. That puts it into the same bucket as moon landing hoax crankery.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893111&forum_id=2...id.#50068107) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 2:40 PM Author: lascivious lay
I guess it depends on what you consider fringe. There is a lot of stuff that is "fringe," but not necessarily baseless. e.g.) being opposed to the Civil Rights Act.
Many people will not say anything about that even if they agree with the arguments.
But again, I am not sure what you are really referring to.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893111&forum_id=2...id.#50068035) |
|
|