SCOTUS cucking on mail in ballots is wild
| Rose ratface space | 06/29/26 | | Slate Tank Doctorate | 06/29/26 | | Vermilion turdskin | 06/29/26 | | Rose ratface space | 06/29/26 | | Slate Tank Doctorate | 06/29/26 | | Sepia base boiling water | 06/29/26 | | Rose ratface space | 06/29/26 | | Sepia base boiling water | 06/29/26 | | Rose ratface space | 06/29/26 | | Sepia base boiling water | 06/29/26 | | Rose ratface space | 06/29/26 | | house-broken odious macaca | 06/29/26 | | Sepia base boiling water | 06/29/26 | | arrogant useless brakes antidepressant drug | 06/29/26 | | arrogant useless brakes antidepressant drug | 06/29/26 | | Slate Tank Doctorate | 06/29/26 | | Disturbing hell organic girlfriend | 06/29/26 | | laughsome brilliant locale | 06/29/26 | | Rose ratface space | 06/29/26 | | laughsome brilliant locale | 06/29/26 | | Rose ratface space | 06/29/26 | | Concupiscible Khaki Jewess | 06/29/26 | | buff business firm candlestick maker | 06/29/26 | | haunting lascivious clown french chef | 06/29/26 | | laughsome brilliant locale | 06/29/26 | | Disturbing hell organic girlfriend | 06/29/26 | | Big Forum | 06/29/26 | | Embarrassed to the bone translucent mother sanctuary | 06/29/26 | | Dashing Coldplay Fan | 06/29/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: June 29th, 2026 1:43 PM Author: Rose ratface space
whether or not it's a good thing for the supreme court to rule by fiat is irrelevant. it's the objective situation that we have right now
they can either accept the responsibility to rule by fiat, or they can be selfish cowards and refuse to, which is what they have chosen
they are weak, selfish people. not referring to alito, thomas, the niggress, the spicess, or the jewess. because they actually *have* taken up the responsibility that's been given to them. it's the others who are pathetic cowards
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878300&forum_id=2...id..#49969172) |
 |
Date: June 29th, 2026 2:56 PM Author: Rose ratface space
uh, yeah, in that system voting *is* irrelevant. that system in question? the system that we have right now, where the judiciary can simply declare anything that the elected president does "illegal" or "legal" as it wishes
the judiciary currently has all of the domestic sovereignty that is contained within the federal government. this is a fact. it's not me describing my hypothetical normative ideal. i don't like this state of affairs any more than you do!
given this state of affairs, the members of the head of the judiciary - the supreme court - should step up and take on the mantle of responsibility that has been given to them, for better or for worse
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878300&forum_id=2...id..#49969261) |
 |
Date: June 29th, 2026 7:53 PM Author: Rose ratface space
All they have to do is exercise the power and responsibility that has been given to them
It's like a beta cuck dork husband refusing to assert himself over his shit testing wife who is desperately pushing him to try to get him to assert himself over her like she wants
These people suuuucckkk
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878300&forum_id=2...id..#49969932) |
|
|