Hubble tension now a 7-sigma discovery (cosmology 100% broken)
| The Penis | 05/21/26 | | Fucking Fuckface | 05/21/26 | | icanseemyneurons | 05/21/26 | | xXxPARSIGOD420xXx | 05/21/26 | | Wilbur Mercer, permanently embarrassed millionaire | 05/21/26 | | icanseemyneurons | 05/21/26 | | cucumbers | 05/21/26 | | Kenneth Play | 05/21/26 | | (NSFW) | 05/21/26 | | xXxPARSIGOD420xXx | 05/21/26 | | (NSFW) | 05/21/26 | | UhOh | 05/21/26 | | cucumbers | 05/21/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 21st, 2026 8:22 AM Author: Fucking Fuckface
At a fancy cocktail party, Julia begins talking about all of the Habibi tension in cosmetology, her eyes widening for dramatic effect as she leans in to whisper about the seven Cigna events
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2E#49892776)
|
 |
Date: May 21st, 2026 10:00 AM Author: cucumbers
There's a large, unexplained, and statistically significant difference between measuring how quickly the universe is expanding using two different techniques.
At first, these two different measurement techniques had a lot of overlap in their results, but as they've gotten more precise over the years, the difference became too large to explain as just an insignificant statistical blip.
This is important only if you take cosmology seriously, which you shouldn't, because it's a shitty, flimsy, and weak field of "science."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867867&forum_id=2E#49892886) |
|
|