Asking AI To Edit Legal Writing Is Like A Biglaw Partner Who Can't Stop Editing
| vibrant idiotic crackhouse regret | 06/09/26 | | vibrant idiotic crackhouse regret | 06/10/26 | | Ebony Prole | 06/10/26 | | vibrant idiotic crackhouse regret | 06/10/26 | | Ebony Prole | 06/10/26 | | vibrant idiotic crackhouse regret | 06/10/26 | | Titillating Pontificating Indian Lodge Halford | 06/10/26 | | vibrant idiotic crackhouse regret | 06/10/26 | | Slate stead | 06/10/26 | | Slate stead | 06/10/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 9th, 2026 5:38 PM Author: vibrant idiotic crackhouse regret
it's like a biglaw partner who will edit the fuck out of your brief up until 11:59pm of the filing deadline. every new markup will raise new shit he didnt raise before that he could have raised earlier and may even put back in shit he previously took out.
AI is fairly good at editing briefs, but it never ends.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5872567&forum_id=2E#49926146) |
Date: June 10th, 2026 9:14 PM Author: Slate stead
I use AI to help with writing (not a lawyer) but I NEVER actually have it write anything. I send what I have and ask for feedback without suggesting wording. there's just a zero percent chance it would produce anything worthwhile compared to my human brain.
note: there ARE some types of material it's really good at, like scientific writing, or just summarizing a bunch of technical info concisely in general
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5872567&forum_id=2E#49929293) |
|
|