\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Wait, this is the holding of Wong Kim Ark??

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a lan...
Nofapping milky useless brakes old irish cottage
  12/08/25
I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it ove...
Bat shit crazy marvelous tanning salon gunner
  12/08/25
You know how
Lime Preventive Strike Filthpig
  12/08/25
hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary...
Nofapping milky useless brakes old irish cottage
  12/08/25
imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but r...
Irradiated Death Wish Church
  12/08/25
I don't have to imagine.
Nofapping milky useless brakes old irish cottage
  12/08/25
...
Irradiated Death Wish Church
  12/08/25
180
idiotic pale point degenerate
  12/09/25
...
opaque pit athletic conference
  12/09/25
correct
ungodly learning disabled pozpig
  12/09/25
...
Biglaw partner throwin' ya some overtime
  06/18/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:37 PM
Author: Nofapping milky useless brakes old irish cottage

United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), is a landmark decision[2] of the U.S. Supreme Court which held that "a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China", automatically became a U.S. citizen at birth.[3]

Seems like a salient factor that WKA's parents "have a permanent domicile and residence in the united states and are there carrying on business"?

How does this turn into "who, at the time of his birth, entered the country illegally and committed a crime in entering"?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49495681)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Bat shit crazy marvelous tanning salon gunner

I'm sure Trump's executive order is sufficient to get it overturned

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49495682)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:38 PM
Author: Lime Preventive Strike Filthpig

You know how

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49495683)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: Nofapping milky useless brakes old irish cottage

hey buddy that phrase is straight out of the ADLs Dictionary of Hate

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49495687)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: Irradiated Death Wish Church

imagine having such strong opinions about the law here but reading just now for the first tkme a portion of the wikipedia entry

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49495686)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:40 PM
Author: Nofapping milky useless brakes old irish cottage

I don't have to imagine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49495688)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 8th, 2025 11:42 PM
Author: Irradiated Death Wish Church



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49495693)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 1:00 AM
Author: idiotic pale point degenerate

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49495787)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 2:08 AM
Author: opaque pit athletic conference



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49495839)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 9th, 2025 12:52 AM
Author: ungodly learning disabled pozpig

correct

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49495777)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 18th, 2026 11:58 AM
Author: Biglaw partner throwin' ya some overtime



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5808198&forum_id=2E#49946265)