The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Cons what the fuck is "absolute immunity?" Is that a legal concept?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:18 PM Author: electric chocolate tank (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573120) |
 |
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:18 PM Author: shivering sadistic crotch yes it is (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573122) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:35 PM Author: electric chocolate tank Why does it exist? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573211) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:44 PM Author: shivering sadistic crotch because White people (your Betters) decided that it should (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573240) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 5:29 PM Author: electric chocolate tank Why? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573418) |
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:19 PM Author: Low-t hall yes, it is (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573125) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:22 PM Author: electric chocolate tank Why does it exist? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573148) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:33 PM Author: Low-t hall who cares (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573205) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:34 PM Author: electric chocolate tank Anyone? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573210) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:20 PM Author: brilliant new version candlestick maker (Stephen Miller’s intern) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573130) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:21 PM Author: gold slap-happy meetinghouse codepig Never heard of it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573138) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 4:35 PM Author: alcoholic big nowag black woman It's the immunity that applies to judges and (in certain circumstances) prosecutors and legislators. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573213) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 5:15 PM Author: electric chocolate tank So judges and legislators can murder people and no one can arrest them? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573368) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 5:26 PM Author: bronze step-uncle's house giraffe it applies only to acts done in the scope of the role. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573411) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 5:29 PM Author: electric chocolate tank Wow. So the DHS donkey who violated DHS policy doesn't enjoy absolute immunity? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573417) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 7:27 PM Author: bronze step-uncle's house giraffe i have no idea if absolute immunity applies to the MN killing.
in general, though, the question of whether something is in the scope does not turn on whether policy was violated. |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 7:36 PM Author: electric chocolate tank DHS agents violating DHS policies are operating within the scope of their duties? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573813) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 8:26 PM Author: bronze step-uncle's house giraffe that's the entire point, and the power, of absolute immunity. there is no need to decide whether a judge or legislator who is following policy should get immunity.
the entire issue arises when a judge or legislator is doing their job and massively errs. |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 8:27 PM Author: electric chocolate tank Violating policy = doing your job? Wow, government employment is amazing! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573971) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 8:33 PM Author: bronze step-uncle's house giraffe i'm not sure you and i are focusing on the key issue.
absolute immunity becomes an issue when someone arguably fucks up. it doesn't become an issue when someone follows policy.
so if a judge makes a massively erroneous ruling but wasn't bribed, etc., then it was within the scope of the job but was outside policy -- and the judge gets absolute immunity. |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 8:34 PM Author: electric chocolate tank So there are no consequences for "fucking up" if you work for the government (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49573991) |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 11:21 PM Author: bronze step-uncle's house giraffe absolute immunity is quite rare, as i understand it.
qualified immunity is more common, but even there it is broadly applied. cons have wanted to trim back or even decimate QI but libs have opposed that. |
|
Date: January 8th, 2026 11:38 PM Author: electric chocolate tank I'm stupid so please bear with me: if there's a written agency policy that says "don't shoot moving vehicles," but an agency official shoots into a moving a vehicle, can the agency official still claim he was acting within the scope of his duties? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49574741) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2026 12:05 AM Author: bronze step-uncle's house giraffe that's my understanding, yes. AI is a doctrine for fuck-up situations. but if you're doing more or less the official function, even if you get it wrong, it's within the scope. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49574789) |
|
Date: January 9th, 2026 12:15 AM Author: electric chocolate tank If he accidentally shot the driver I can see it, but this guy had extensive training and indemnifying him is a bad look for any employer. I guess I'll leave it there (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5819258&forum_id=2Vannesa#49574803) |