All those CS degrees getting ZERO pussy grinding code just poof gone

Could’ve been hardcore degenmaxxxing for like a decade straight and just learn AI at a coffee shop over a wknd and take over these fags

Fuck I would kms for sure lmaoo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49664202)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

JOHN BARRON, Plaintiff, Case No.: 26-CV-0211

v. COMPLAINT

JOHN DOE, d/b/a "Covid was a Hoax," Defendant. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

I. Parties

Plaintiff John Barron is an individual and resident of Palm Beach, Florida.

Defendant, whose legal identity is currently unknown, is a user of the website xoxohth.com (hereinafter "the Platform") operating under the pseudonym "Covid was a Hoax."

II. Jurisdiction and Venue

This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, as there is diversity of citizenship and the matter in controversy exceeds $75,000.

Venue is proper in the Southern District of New York under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) as the Platform is a widely accessed digital forum that conducts business and impacts individuals within this district.

III. Factual Allegations

On February 11, 2026, at 7:09 PM, Defendant published a public statement on the Platform: "nothing can wipe out lawmaxxing."

The Platform, xoxohth.com, is an anonymous message board frequently used by members of the legal profession to discuss litigation, law school, and legal strategy.

The term "lawmaxxing" is a colloquialism within digital subcultures referring to the aggressive or exhaustive utilization of legal procedures to achieve a desired social or professional result.

Plaintiff alleges that the publication of this statement on a legal-centric forum constitutes a call to action for users to engage in coordinated legal harassment against the Plaintiff.

Defendant’s username, "Covid was a Hoax," indicates a history of disseminating contrarian viewpoints, suggesting the post was intended to incite disruption.

IV. Cause of Action: Tortious Interference

Plaintiff incorporates the allegations in paragraphs 1 through 9.

Defendant’s public advocacy for "lawmaxxing" on a legal industry forum is an intentional effort to interfere with Plaintiff's legal interests and professional reputation.

Plaintiff has incurred and will continue to incur damages, including legal fees and reputational harm, as a direct result of these communications.

V. Prayer for Relief

Plaintiff requests the following:

Entry of a preliminary and permanent injunction restraining Defendant from further communications inciting legal action against the Plaintiff on the Platform.

Award of compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial.

Award of costs and reasonable attorney's fees.

Dated: February 11, 2026

Signed: /s/ [Counsel Name], Attorney for Plaintiff

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49664320)

it's the gen z version of boomers saying a college degree guaranteed a umc lifestyle.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49665685)

Tall marketing & networking Chads will inherit the earth

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49665988)

By the way, passing through Brussels soon. Recommend any good smoking bars? Any still left?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49665331)

The AI is literally writing itself now

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49665602)

I also get the fact that this is where the conversation is at with regard to AI ability (when NLP was still extraordinarily difficult for even simple application just a few years ago) means that nothing is off the table. But this still remains to be seen.

Solutions to e.g. millennium prize problems are not out there no matter where you look or how the model is able to generalize or synthesize.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49672840)

Yeah but EPAH assured me it's all an overblown scam.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49673190)

Whoa -- imagine my shock that right here on XO (the bort where Pumos are constantly shitting on me for being a "fucking retard dumbass" on the topic of Tesla FSD), I walk into this thread and immediately discover a Pumo who clearly has no idea what's actually going on with the technical aspects of Tesla FSD in 2026. I'm shocked!

"Computer programmers" basically have nothing to do with Tesla's current FSD code, at least in any traditional sense. After years and years of exhaustive incremental refinements done by armies of brilliant and accomplished human computer programmers (which ultimately resulted in software that was objectively impressive on many levels but still nowhere near where it needed to be for truly autonomous self driving), a few years ago as AI was first starting to really come to the forefront Elon harnessed all of his compute power and started using AI programs to "train" FSD organically (and rewrite the code themselves from the ground up using their learnings from that training) by leveraging Tesla's massive and unparalleled private stockpile of real world driving video / data.

[SIDEBAR: This is a good place to point out that Waymo's FSD system is fundamentally different from Tesla's FSD system on a critical point -- Waymo's system is designed to only operate within specific geofenced areas that have been exhaustively mapped out first using maps which are regularly updated. Waymo thus needs to respond to changes in traffic patterns and human behavior, but it only needs to do that on terrain which it knows like the back of its hand. By contrast, Tesla is designed to perform the same task but do so anywhere -- including on roads in cities it has never encountered before, which creates a full magnitude of additional complexity that needs to be accounted for in Tesla's code. This is one of the many reasons why at the end of the day, Waymo will simply never be able to compete with Tesla at scale across the globe, because according to Elon the only way to solve that problem is to leverage AI to train on a MASSIVE database of real world data and write code from the ground up which covers basically every possible edge case, and Waymo only has a tiny fraction of the data that Tesla has at its disposal and it has no viable path to catch up anytime soon.]

At this point, it's safe to say that basically no one in Tesla has any fucking idea what's ACTUALLY going on with the FSD code on a fundamental technical level -- all they know is the process by which it was created, the process by which AI is continuing to refine it, how well it currently works in the real world, and (roughly speaking) what edge-case weaknesses still need to be shored up moving forward.

Without AI, Tesla -- and all of its competitors in the FSD space that are trying to create programs which can actually drive you around anywhere in the world -- would still be limping along. AI was, and remains, the gamechanger in that field. Why do you think Elon decided to go all in on AI and basically leverage the future his entire empire in order to try and quickly win that battle and then build a giant moat around his competitive advantage as quickly as humanly possible? After a decade of unsuccessfully throwing tons of money and some of the smartest people on Earth at the FSD problem to try and create a program that truly solved it in a universal way, he saw what AI did and how quickly it accomplished it and he realized that this is the most powerful tool ever created in human history by several orders of magnitude, and he is uniquely position to get in on the ground floor and harness it for his own purposes moving forward.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49673177)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49665996)

every developer was faced from an early point in learning to code or their career with the reality that some people really are just 1000x better than you and that's that. lawyers seem to have mostly convinced themselves they are Critical and Irreplaceable

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49674798)

But it ain’t happening anytime soon. If you’ve never actually worked for a horrible American company full of idiots and managed by retarded Boomers, then you just can’t understand. And if you are an independent Engineer with grand visions of changing human nature with your sick Rust app, like so many Nerds with billions of dollars, AI wont be sufficient for what you are trying to do.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49674806)

Elon Musk bought Twitter and then laid off literally like 80%+ of the workforce within a few weeks. A vast horde of smug shitlibs immediately began screeching about how he was a retard who doesn't understand complex systems like "social media companies," THIS TIME he had REALLY fucked up, the whole platform would come crashing down and become nonfunctional any day and totally destroy his entire investment in the company, "just wait two weeks," etc etc etc.

Result?

Absolutely none of that happened. From a technical perspective, Twitter works just as well now as it did before Elon bought it (whether you like the content or the amount / type of advertising it has on it now is a different matter), and it was definitively proven that the VAST majority of people who were previously employed there (many of them pulling in nice six figure salaries) were not merely replaceable, but *literally* totally unnecessary for the entire company and the platform to function just fine.

AI is basically Elon on steroids in this analogy -- over the next few years, it's going to sweep through entire industries like a raging brushfire and clear away decades worth of absolutely massive bullshit employment overgrowth. And executives at publicly-traded companies looking to maximize profits and shareholder value are literally going to have no choice but to adopt it once the returns really start coming in; it won't even be a discretionary decision at some point, it will simply become another fiduciary obligation.

Will AI reduce headcount by 100% and render all human workers superfluous within the next few years? No, obviously not, just like Elon didn't fire literally everyone who worked at Twitter. That's a stupid strawman that retards and bad faith faggots pull out to beat up and pretend that AI is "mostly overblown bullshit" or whatever. But that's going to be very cold comfort for the tens of millions of people who it will indeed put out of work (or in the case of new grads, keep from ever joining the workforce in the first place) within just that short near-term timespan.

XOXO, HTH.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49674848)

ricki I am building my own SaaS with claude max and gemini RN. when I realized the pain point in my industry it all clicked--i remembered you explaining your SaaS concept (won't mention the details I remember) and it just all makes sense now what needs to be done. l'chaim

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5833821&forum_id=2Vannesa#49675243)