For instance this references a plaintiffs firm in Los Angeles that reached out to them.

https://x.com/RinconcitoMadr1/status/1985063373642584261

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49399964)

that's an apology

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49399240)

"I’ve chosen to delete my posts/RTs yesterday about the math teachers with the blood soaked shirts.

The visual of the shirts was so incredibly evocative of recent events that I found it totally implausible they didn’t know what they were doing, but especially with evidence they’ve worn them before I realize that is at best a very unprovable assertion about people’s inner mental state. And of course, as someone extremely close to those events I must recognize I’m far more primed to see references to them than others are."

this is like a deliberate non-apology. why couldn't he just say "whoops i jumped the gun, i'm still reeling from this" when he saw that they wore the same shirts last year?

c'mon charles lol would it kill you to just write "i'm sorry" there? or just say nothing?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49400362)

at worst, it's an honest mistake, but no one with a brain believes these teachers did this inadvertently

the entire scenario doesn't even make sense

"problem solved" and having your neck cut means what for a math problem? that you are better off killing yourself than doing the math problem?

if it is for a serial killer, it's not like anyone jason kills in friday the 13th is a problem.

it's like trusting ilhan omar that she didn't know what from the river to the sea meant

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401485)

https://tinyurl.com/2sj9fv3v

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401547)

This thread is an extremely bizarre blend of bad faith lib trolls and genuine doofuses who do not Get It at all

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401495)

why say anything at all then?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401561)

Charles made the statistically most likely determination given the information available to him. This is the opposite of a mistake - it's correct

There are Bayesian thinkers, and then there's everyone else

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401588)

It's embarrassingly naive at best and extremely disingenuous at worst to pretend otherwise

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401738)

but this wasn't the statistically most likely outcome and your lisping fucking bayesianism (lol) is gay as fuck. this wasn't a cold analysis of probability, it was a kneejerk reaction, and one that turned out to be incorrect. any non-extremely online person that saw these photos didn't think they had anything to do with kirk. i didn't.

it's understandable that charles, who was close to kirk, would be sensitive about this. you still being "70/30 on this" (lol statistics masterman!) just belies you own bias.

you're acting exactly like cancel culture shitlibs circa 2022 and it's embarrassing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401910)

Never apologize when you don't do anything wrong. It's very bad not only from a reputational perspective, but also for your personal integrity. Those who "apologize" when they do nothing wrong are unable to give meaningful apologies to others when they do make mistakes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401939)

you are so far gone lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401957)

That is - not a "mistake" at all. Hope this helps

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401961)

again, you are acting EXACTLY like cancel culture libs. being wrong about dumb ass shit and then justifying it. it's womanly and you should be ashamed. a man owns up to his mistakes.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401975)

Which is why my apologies to people in my life actually mean something when I make real mistakes, unlike 99% of people who give perfunctory "sorries" to shield themselves from ever taking any kind of accountability for anything, either from others or their own psyche

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401995)

otoh, you're a fucking idiot so there is that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49409122)

Hope this helps

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401740)

only in rapetileland is the "statistically most likely interpretation" of a bloody Halloween costume "they are obviously making fun of this one specific murder that happened two months ago" as opposed to "halloween has lots of people dressed like bloody corpses"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401889)

lmao what a queer little bitch, he really deserves to get his bald head smashed in

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49399238)

Lol, and this guy was considered "intelligent" by xo shitcons?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401465)

Don't forget that you're talking to a "brilliant lawyer" who has literally been personally excoriated by a sitting D. Ct. judge for being such a shitty hack on behalf of his penis pill client that he got caught and benchslapped for outright lying to the court.

"Oh really, you don't think I'm a genius? Really?!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401749)

It’s a small thing but you have to look in relation to the v. See?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401875)

I mean, it's all relative -- compared to what?

He's significantly smarter than you, so we can probably end the conversation there.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401746)

and you doxxed Charles to CNN

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49399618)

They don’t have to prove Charles was the first but if he was that’s worse still.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401854)

you absolutely doxxed Charles to CNN didn't you

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49399503)

and yes you were the one who outed him

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401488)

Real talk: I think people should be allowed to say things about breaking news and not be held accountable if it's a genuine mistake and they correct course right away. But the problem with these big monetized accounts is that when they spread shit on the internet it takes a life of its own fast and you cant put the genie back in the bottle. A lot of people with big followings should be more careful about what they write online.

The nice thing about xo is that there are like 6 active posters here so if you say something stupid there's really no harm. haha

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49399516)

the man is a poaster

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49400337)

i don't really have a solution in mind but this is why i try not to react to breaking news until all the dust settles.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49400348)

where is the humanity? the guy gets shot on national television and something that plausibly seems like they're mocking the matter pops up. of course he's going to defend his buddy. wtf is wrong with people

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49399533)

hamas lost, by the way

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401493)

originally i think what we all liked about social media was the ability to be genuine and off the cuff about your thoughts, as it was taken for granted that the platforms weren't "all that serious"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49399611)

https://x.com/realmattforney/status/1983512601683267963?s=46

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49399806)

The bigger question as a few people here have pointed out, seems to be how any one person can be blamed from instigating the death threats if several big accounts all pushed the incorrect argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49399904)

No one even considers that (A) one or more of them might be time travelers, of (B) they were part of the conspiracy to kill Charlie for many years.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5793154&forum_id=2Vannesa#49401481)