What I'm saying is: Yes, of course women understand how much men desire them. In fact, attracting that desire is so significant to them that some women make being desirable their top priority.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888657&forum_id=2Vannesa#50040473)

I'm just dissecting your internal logic. To be clear I think women can conceptualize things about as equally as men.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888657&forum_id=2Vannesa#50040527)

Same reason why they can't understand the male instinct and attraction toward violence. It's just not possible for them

There are corresponding female physiological phenomena that we men can't understand, either. But they're boring and uninteresting so men never think or talk about them

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888657&forum_id=2Vannesa#50040569)

Yeah, that's because I love and appreciate women, unlike most men. They're 180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888657&forum_id=2Vannesa#50040585)

The downside is putting up with all their nonsense. Every woman has some retarded bullshit you have to do as a service payment to having them around. And often this is way too costly in time money and energy to be worth it. If they could chill the fuck out and be less demanding it would be way easier but they can't. Literally none of them can be chill ever. So you always have to weigh the cost benefit. You have to suffer somewhat to get something you ostensibly want. If you don't pay the piper they get resentful and eventually leave.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888657&forum_id=2Vannesa#50040592)

It works the same way as the instinctive drive to ascend in the intrasexual dominance hierarchy for males

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888657&forum_id=2Vannesa#50040554)

I always cringe when people use "people" or "humans" as pronouns when they talk about human society or interpersonal relations. There's no such thing as "a person." Every individual is a man or a woman and that is what informs every part of them and everything they do, not their "humanity." Everything is "linked" to sex

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888657&forum_id=2Vannesa#50040595)

On an individual level, whether that's more about outcompeting peers or attracting a mate is going to vary. Seems analogous to whether men want to he the strongest because of the utility of being strong versus wanting to be as high as they can in the hierarchy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888657&forum_id=2Vannesa#50040622)

Two observations:

-disagree on the orgasm part. Women 100% have an orgasm. I’ve never had a 1 night stand so every chick I’ve banged I banged 5+ times. Each one there’s a clear reaction to her cumming vs. not. Every chick has at least one time or another told me “you had me close but didn’t get me.”

-hot chicks have an idea how bad guys want sex. Ones who aren’t hot don’t. I have a work friend who is in her 30’s and was a smoke show when she was early 20’s. She’s the best 30’s I’ve ever seen. She broke up with a LTR and is on dating apps. She will show me some 6’2 chad and she will have drinks and call the date off. I’m like wtf this guy was perfect why wouldn’t you keep this going. She says I can tell from his voice he just wanted me for sex so I cut it off before even continuing the date.

Ugly chicks/mediocre chicks just assume the guy was as big of a failure as them and don’t think the guy every needed sex bc they never had guys approach them like that.

Also the acceptance of my wife of my porn addiction and grok imagines and Oculus they come to realize guys wanna just nut. They have to accept this so you don’t cheat/prostitutes/strip clubs

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5888657&forum_id=2Vannesa#50041532)