The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Comey’s motions to dismiss being filed Monday
| ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 10/18/25 |
| ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 10/18/25 |
| https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK | 10/18/25 |
| ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 10/19/25 |
| ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 10/20/25 |
| ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 10/20/25 |
| Metal Up Your Ass | 10/20/25 |
| ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. | 10/20/25 |
| ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, | 10/20/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 18th, 2025 8:39 PM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. Pepper thy angus cons (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2Vannesa#49358591) |
Date: October 18th, 2025 8:41 PM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. Also Illinois’ and Chicago’s response briefs to Trump’s emergency SCOTUS appeal are due the same day. We could have a decision on that one by Tuesday. I predict SCOTUS refuses to lift the stay and refuses to hear the appeal. If they do hear the appeal Trump will lose 7-2 with the two Nazis voting in his favor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2Vannesa#49358600) |
 |
Date: October 18th, 2025 9:35 PM Author: https://imgur.com/a/o2g8xYK I don't think Trump wins any conservatives for the simple fact that the states themselves oppose this. Virtually every statute we have on this seems to assume that if the POTUS is commanding the National Guard within a state, the governor of that state has asked for help. No one in Congress ever imagined a scenario where the governor is saying "we don't need help" but the POTUS is deploying the NG in that state (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2Vannesa#49358728) |
|
Date: October 19th, 2025 1:13 PM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2Vannesa#49359868) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 8:59 AM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. 7th Circuit: “Political opposition is not rebellion. Also, Trump is a tool and nobody respects him. We vote 3-0 to affirm.” (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2Vannesa#49361329) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 10:56 PM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. Motions look pretty solid to me. With the January trial date looming we could get a very quick dismissal
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.vaed.582136/gov.uscourts.vaed.582136.59.0_1.pdf |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 11:31 PM Author: Metal Up Your Ass lol at this shit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5787602&forum_id=2Vannesa#49363238) |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 11:04 PM Author: ,.,.,.,.,.,.,..,:,,:,,.,:::,.,,.,:.,,.:.,:.,:.::,. Lawyer who signed the brief
https://carmichaellegal.com/attorneys/jessica-carmichael/ |
|
Date: October 20th, 2025 11:11 PM Author: ........,,,,,,......,.,.,.,,,,,,,,,, I think he's guilty by how difficult the actual paragraph refuting the facts is to parse.
It seems to me he's arguing that - even though Cruz in that line of questioning asks if Comey ever authorized leaks about Trump - Comey's response was that he stands by his statements in 2017 - but those 2017 statements were about leaks about Hilary
It seems like Comey is sort of ceding that he authorized leaks about Trump, but is arguing in the Cruz exchange that he never lied about it, because he just spoke in riddles that actually referred to Hillary.
Is that right?
---------
The indictment focuses on testimony that Mr. Comey gave in response to questioning by Senator Ted Cruz at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the Crossfire Hurricane investigation. See Oversight of the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation: Day 3, Hearing Before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 116th Cong. (Sept. 30, 2020), During that hearing, Senator Cruz described how, during 2017 testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Mr. Comey had denied “ever authoriz[ing] someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton Administration.” Excerpt of Transcript of Oversight of the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation: Day 3, Hearing Before the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary, 116th Cong., at 11 (Sept. 30 2020) (“Crossfire Hurricane Oversight Transcript”), Exhibit C. Senator Cruz then asserted that Andrew McCabe, who previously served as Mr. Comey’s Deputy Director of the FBI, “publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal and that [Mr. Comey was] directly aware of it, and that [Mr. Comey] directly authorized it.” Id. Senator Cruz asked Mr. Comey “[w]ho’s telling the truth?” Mr. Comey responded: “I can only speak to my testimony,” and “I stand by . . . the testimony you summarized that I gave in May of 2017.” Id. Senator Cruz followed up by asking: “So, your testimony is you’ve never authorized anyone to leak. And Mr. McCabe when if he says contrary, is not telling the truth, is that correct?” Id. In response, Mr. Comey stated: “Again, I’m not going to characterize [McCabe’s] testimony, but mine is the same today.” Id. The indictment misstates the exchange between Senator Cruz and Mr. Comey. Senator Cruz asked Mr. Comey to affirm or deny prior testimony that he authorized “someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about . . . the Clinton Administration.” But Hillary Clinton was not elected, and Senator Grassley’s original questioning in 2017 related to the “Clinton investigation.” See FBI Oversight Transcript at 5, Exhibit B. The indictment nonetheless mischaracterizes Mr. Comey as stating that he “had not ‘authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports’ regarding an FBI investigation concerning PERSON 1,” ECF No. 1 at 1 (emphasis added). Thus, the indictment replaces Senator Cruz’s reference to the “Clinton Administration” with a reference to “PERSON 1” (Hillary Clinton) and misleadingly attributes statements to Mr. Comey that he did not in fact make during his September 30, 2020, testimony. 8
Further, the indictment omits Senator Cruz’s words that explicitly narrow the focus of his questions to Mr. McCabe and misleadingly implies that the questioning related to Mr. Richman. In fact, Mr. Comey’s September 2020 exchange with Senator Cruz made no reference whatsoever to Mr. Richman, who ultimately appears in the indictment as PERSON 3. Instead, the context of the exchange confirms that Senator Cruz was asking about leaks by Mr. McCabe—indeed, Senator Cruz asked Mr. Comey whether he or Mr. McCabe was “telling the truth.” In other words, the indictment presents an inaccurate description of the testimony at the heart of this case.
|