The reason we have oil is because there was nothing that could eat early plants
| Carmine charismatic box office tattoo | 01/06/26 | | demanding cuckold | 01/06/26 | | Puce fat ankles telephone | 01/06/26 | | demanding cuckold | 01/06/26 | | Puce fat ankles telephone | 01/06/26 | | demanding cuckold | 01/06/26 | | Carmine charismatic box office tattoo | 01/06/26 | | demanding cuckold | 01/06/26 | | Carmine charismatic box office tattoo | 01/06/26 | | aphrodisiac national | 01/07/26 | | Glassy boiling water | 01/06/26 | | Sickened hall | 01/06/26 | | Puce fat ankles telephone | 01/06/26 | | cerise senate ladyboy | 01/06/26 | | Puce fat ankles telephone | 01/06/26 | | Mint generalized bond | 01/06/26 | | mildly autistic trailer park macaca | 01/06/26 | | Geriatric psychic | 01/06/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: January 6th, 2026 11:29 PM Author: demanding cuckold
again, i could be dead wrong but i think your claim is wrong. bacteria could decompose plants when plants first arose.
what bacteria could not originally do is decompose lignin created by trees but that was much later in time. that's how we got coal.
the leading theory about oil, on the other hand, was that it was organic material that failed to decompose because it happened to die in low oxygen environments.
am i wrong?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5818203&forum_id=2Vannesa#49568134) |
|
|