The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
NPR: CBS Cancels Colbert Despite High Ratings
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 18th, 2026 11:36 AM Author: Comical Fat Ankles Potus Lmao libs are irate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867200&forum_id=2Vannesa#49888423) |
Date: May 18th, 2026 11:37 AM Author: Gaped ladyboy dingle berry ljl wasn't he losing like $100MM a year? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867200&forum_id=2Vannesa#49888424) |
 |
Date: May 18th, 2026 11:38 AM Author: Comical Fat Ankles Potus Listen here reptile, the ratings were HIGH* Ok?!?!
*Relative to the other late night shows that are also hemorrhaging money |
|
Date: May 18th, 2026 11:40 AM Author: Gaped ladyboy dingle berry lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867200&forum_id=2Vannesa#49888430) |
|
Date: May 18th, 2026 11:38 AM Author: mentally impaired telephone (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867200&forum_id=2Vannesa#49888426) |
|
Date: May 18th, 2026 11:40 AM Author: Tantric House it wasn't "highly rated." such a lie. it had a small number of viewers and the median age of those viewers was 68. advertisers don't pay much for shitty audiences.
on top of weak ratings, it had a massively bloated production cost and was losing something like $40 million per year. |
|
Date: May 18th, 2026 11:24 PM Author: salmon talented new version pozpig The most fascinating statistic was that CBS sort of pushed out Letterman for Colbert to get younger because his average viewer was 58, and 10 years later, Colbert's average viewer is 68.
It's almost as if Colbert didn't get a single new viewer and just steadily lost Letterman viewers over the years. |
|
Date: May 30th, 2026 7:04 PM Author: Lascivious queen of the night I used to watch letterman every once in a while if I saw it on
Never once watched Colbert |
|
Date: May 18th, 2026 12:43 PM Author: Tantric House NYT: late night shows aren't about revenue and proftis, they're about networks expressing their identities.
"Having a late-night star on the air most weeknights has been a powerful statement, affirming that the broadcasters were still in the game, still offering original programming taped before a live audience that viewers showed up for, year round. Successful hosts became their networks’ signature stars."
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/16/opinion/stephen-colbert-late-show-cbs.html |
|
Date: May 18th, 2026 11:54 PM Author: stirring scarlet quadroon except viewers aren't showing up. hard to have a 'signature star' if he's beaming his show into dead air.
|
|
Date: May 30th, 2026 6:26 PM Author: Tantric House lol, CBS put out a statement confirming what had been reported: Colbert lost $40m per year. CBS says replacing him is a $55m/year swing.
https://www.tvinsider.com/1266860/cbs-says-late-night-deal-with-byron-allen-will-turn-a-15-million-profit/ |
|
Date: May 30th, 2026 6:32 PM Author: Well-lubricated Address lmao that's actually insane that he was allowed to Lose for so long (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867200&forum_id=2Vannesa#49907887) |
|
Date: May 30th, 2026 7:00 PM Author: Tantric House he was what the economists call a luxury good or a prestige good. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5867200&forum_id=2Vannesa#49907901) |