is it because it's true	razzle filthy love of her life	07/13/26
The rhetorical need for a historical boogeyman. Many differe...	Splenetic boistinker	07/13/26
Oh damn should I do this with my predecessors	razzle filthy love of her life	07/13/26
Bet	Splenetic boistinker	07/13/26
Historically, bad Latin and uncritical reading of "auth...	Drunken Chrome Stock Car Orchestra Pit	07/13/26
The Aristotelian claim that substances possess irreducible f...	Splenetic boistinker	07/13/26
Rupert Sheldrake discussed this	razzle filthy love of her life	07/13/26
The stuff he says about Aristotle is legit. Some of the stuf...	Splenetic boistinker	07/13/26
...	razzle filthy love of her life	07/13/26

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:17 PM Author: razzle filthy love of her life is it because it's true (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2Vannesa#49997960)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:27 PM Author: Splenetic boistinker The rhetorical need for a historical boogeyman. Many different groups benefitted from portraying their predecessors as sterile schoolmen. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2Vannesa#49997987)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:28 PM Author: razzle filthy love of her life Oh damn should I do this with my predecessors (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2Vannesa#49997989)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:33 PM Author: Splenetic boistinker Bet (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2Vannesa#49997997)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:34 PM Author: Drunken Chrome Stock Car Orchestra Pit Historically, bad Latin and uncritical reading of "authorities" based on incomplete or corrupt corpora, and then materialism in the natural sciences proved so powerful that the idea that substantial forms have any causal power was almost entirely abandoned. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2Vannesa#49998000)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:52 PM Author: Splenetic boistinker The Aristotelian claim that substances possess irreducible forms that ground their identity, unity and directed activities still has not been decisively refuted by science. I think at the very least a naturalized account of form as causally efficacious organization is highly plausible, while the stronger scholastic ontology remains a live but unverified interpretation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2Vannesa#49998043)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:54 PM Author: razzle filthy love of her life Rupert Sheldrake discussed this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2Vannesa#49998046)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:59 PM Author: Splenetic boistinker The stuff he says about Aristotle is legit. Some of the stuff he says regarding biology is obviously crankery, but actually not bad if taken as metaphor. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2Vannesa#49998061)

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:54 PM Author: razzle filthy love of her life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2Vannesa#49998047)