The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Renée is getting a gold coffin
| exhilarant hominid | 01/10/26 |
| Cyan Rigor | 01/10/26 |
| exhilarant hominid | 01/10/26 |
| Cyan Rigor | 01/10/26 |
| exhilarant hominid | 01/10/26 |
| Claret appetizing giraffe degenerate | 01/10/26 |
| rambunctious box office sandwich | 01/10/26 |
| Misanthropic Soul-stirring Bawdyhouse | 01/10/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 10th, 2026 1:43 PM Author: exhilarant hominid LJL https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/24pdf/23-1239_onjq.pdf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2most#49578867) |
Date: January 10th, 2026 1:57 PM Author: Cyan Rigor Most notable here, the “totality of the circumstances” inquiry has no time limit. While the situation at the precise time of the shooting will often matter most, earlier facts and circumstances may bear on how a reasonable officer would have understood and responded to later ones. Prior events may show why a reasonable officer would perceive otherwise ambiguous conduct as threatening, or instead as innocuous. Plumhoff v. Rickard, 572 U. S. 765, well illustrates this point. There, an officer’s use of deadly force was justified “at the moment” partly because of what had transpired in the preceding period. Id., at 777.
==== so the general conduct of the MN protestors creating threats to ICE is relevant as is the conduct of the two women in the Honda Pilot. helps the officer, right? |
 |
Date: January 10th, 2026 2:46 PM Author: exhilarant hominid Yes, it makes his decision to walk in front of the vehicle in violation of policy and training (while of course engaging in an arrest without reasonable suspicion) even more extreme and therefore weighs heavily against qualified immunity. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2most#49578975) |
|
Date: January 10th, 2026 2:50 PM Author: Cyan Rigor not sure i buy that analysis. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2most#49578985) |
|
Date: January 10th, 2026 2:54 PM Author: exhilarant hominid A United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota will disagree. Either that or they will decide that it's irrelevant - unlikely because more open to appeal - or that the protestors did nothing. You can quote me on this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2most#49578989) |
|
Date: January 10th, 2026 2:50 PM Author: Claret appetizing giraffe degenerate "The driver may be drunk, on drugs, armed, or some combination thereof. Or the driver may have committed (or may be about to commit) a serious crime."
wow
"Drivers," and place-goers generally, are a bunch of scumbags. |
|
Date: January 10th, 2026 3:00 PM Author: rambunctious box office sandwich It’s funny how every pencil neck lawyer on this board thinks it’s still 2010.
Whatever happens here, no one is getting paid a nickel. |
|
Date: January 10th, 2026 3:03 PM Author: Misanthropic Soul-stirring Bawdyhouse Not according to your link. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5820409&forum_id=2most#49579011) |