sometimes they come and check on us in electrical interdimensional airships with energy weapons hiding in storm clouds from outside of here

there are ways the eternal binding reality machine can be vandalized & scarred leading to entire parts of our existence being scratched out. this is currently happening with the forced injection of psychotropic torture poison chemicals to tens / hundreds of thousands of people at any given time who are locked in facilities in five point restraints and spit bags over their heads being experimented on in the US and pretty much all countries

there's also a lot of stuff going on with meth, sex drive, sexual fantasies, and sex magik

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49935308)

2020 election - do you mean there was no funny business, or do you mean whatever funny business happened wasn't enough to affect the outcome?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931494)

Yeah. Maybe numbers are exaggerated by 30% or something, but I believe that millions of Jews died. Maybe more of them died from starving than gassing or whatever, but the fact is that statistically a bunch of Jews disappeared. There were shitloads of Jews in Europe, and then there were almost none, and immigration to Israel or the US is nowhere near enough to explain the discrepancy. And it's pretty undeniable that a major Nazi goal was to get rid of Jews. You have to "BUT ACKSHUALLLLY WHAT THEY MEANT WAS..." a lot of shit to argue otherwise.

"2020 election - do you mean there was no funny business, or do you mean whatever funny business happened wasn't enough to affect the outcome?"

I don't believe there was anything resembling an orchestrated conspiracy to rig the election. I don't believe anything that did happen affected the outcome either way. I believe that any "funny business" was likely at worst either a) limited isolated incidents of some election staffer making a ballet box go poof, or b) stuff that's not actually illegal like "helping" poors/retards fill out mail in ballots. Probably quite a lot of the latter. Lots of really horseshit reddit level arguments come up here, like "B B BUT THE SWING INDICATORS!" or "DUR DUR SO MANY MORE PEOPLE VOTED THOUGH!" with very little evidence of pretty much anything. If rigging happened to any significant degree there is no way it would have occurred without massive amounts of evidence in the wake. People are way too fucking retarded to do this in a clean and coordinated on a grand scale while leaving no evidence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931660)

and for the election yeah I'd say no more rigging than usual, without taking a position on exactly how much rigging there usually is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931693)

"Bauer and other historians who knew Wiesenthal said the Nazi hunter told them that he chose the 5 million number carefully: He wanted a number large enough to attract the attention of non-Jews who might not otherwise care about Jewish suffering, but not larger than the actual number of Jews who were murdered in the Holocaust, 6 million."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49932633)

Most of the moon landing was filmed in a studio to break the will of the Soviets. I am torn as to whether or not there was an actual moon landing, but I think much of what we've seen is studio footage.

Consuela isn't totally wrong about what is going on in the world.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49930964)

In fact I believe that Consuela's one-world-control center answers this neatly

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931411)

at this point I wouldn't be shocked about the moon landing. we know they WOULD lie to us about ANYTHING and I certainly can't prove we did it. I still think it was real but I'm not gonna die on that... in that crater?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931455)

The most interesting stuff in the book might be related to Men in Black. Very strange and unnerving, but also sort of fun.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49932588)

Got in a huge fight with a boomer coworker over it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931446)

It's all psyop cold war bullshit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931442)

Although I don't believe this is unhinged but rather is the most parsimonious, logical explanation for many, many things we have observed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931296)

the only specific star that I think was more likely replaced than not is Jim Carrey. there are a lot of people like Selena Gomez and Jenna Ortega who started looking way different within short time periods but I think it's more likely due to trauma, humiliation rituals, etc... but after the Epstein email about Selena Gomez and watching well-researched videos about how she seems to have gotten in the way of powerful Hollywood people's plans and goals, she's second on the list.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931489)

Kanye more so though

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931517)

it could be ANYTHING. maybe concert tix for some of the little girls, whatever. literally anything.

but the theory that people were kicking around even before this email came out, and I'm not saying I actually believe this, is that Biebs and Selena secretly had a baby and he had to choose - for whatever dark purposes - to either give up her or the baby. they chose her and the current Selena is a replacement.

some people use the "die" typo as part of their rationale but nah ding I've read thousands of Epstein emails and don't think his shitty-ass spelling means anything

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49931555)

It is definitely weird how much archaeologists and mainstream historians push back on this stuff. Gobekli Tepe was the tip of the iceberg IMO.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49932598)

Even if one doesn’t agree with his exact conclusions, it is very clear there is way more going on and shit is far, far older than academic freaks would allow us to believe.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49932693)

One of the other things that Hancock does is actually go into the field as almost the default approach. And he makes a very strong case for the usefulness of oral histories and doesn’t dismiss them as myth stories as typical academics do. So he finds leads to pursue because he isn’t tied to standard academic thinking. His book also gave me the sense that he really ‘does the work’ in a way that I don’t think the typical academic does.

The typical academic egghead fraud is just not equipped for this sort of approach and is, in my view, more predisposed to a sort of boring “nothing ever happens” gay perspective because it reflects who they are inside. And collectively they attack anyone who takes real views in opposition to them because it requires some amount of fortitude and will, something they basically never have.

I think there is also a great nihilism that has become pervasive in general and absolutely extends to this field. People have been conditioned to accept that “everything is just random lol we are all just stardust” ::hits vape:: so when someone really challenges their worldview, they lash out.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49932941)

That's the part that makes me feel like there must be more behind the interference plays than simple dogma. But I can't really explain it unless there's something important that needs to be filtered from popular understanding

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49932995)

but there might ALSO be a coordinated effort.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49934305)

One of those ideas that sounds crazy at first, but I think there are decent arguments for. Expert level meditators get to a point where they feel there is no true “self.” And it’s like, than what is there? Maybe it’s the field that we all emerge from and return to again and again for all time.

::rocks back and forth in padded room::

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49932955)

she specifically talks about loss of sense of self, as that's something the participants are surveyed about in some of the studies (spoiler: has to do with more higher-frequency oscillations and suppressed lower-frequency ones). it dovetails with what you're saying exactly, and once you start thinking about it all in terms of your brain's vibrations and the vibrations of the universe it seems almost obvious that this way of modeling brain activity would provide insight that others miss. and it all lines up with intuitions and with the casual language people use to talk about experiencing the world.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49933334)

Also dinosaurs are like 90% bullshit hyped up so archeology fags can get funding and to get kids interested in science

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49934051)

Physicists are just a little too Jewish and a little too atheist. Carl Sagan was just a little too excited to explain how Insignificant the earth is. Makes me think this shit is Flat af tbh.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49934088)

last sentence is 100000% true - and proven - and now that we know that for a fact, I feel like most anything else could be true. I wouldn't be shocked if the lizard people/shapeshifters turned out to be real.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49934117)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49936020)

Some dive bar that happened to have a stock of frozen wings could have made bank just selling them for $10 post-covid but there was literally no one

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49941065)

https://faroutmagazine.co.uk/robert-hunter-and-the-cia-how-mk-ultra-gave-the-grateful-dead-their-voice/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49941097)

More and more I find myself unironically turning into some sort of new age Creationist.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49941626)

Meanwhile (((academics))) will tell you "no all those old stories are just myths from primitive people."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49941672)

You can pretty easily approximate this by sticking a straight stick into the ground, pointing it toward the sun so that it casts no shadow, and then waiting. As the day progresses, its shadow will appear to grow and will point due east. It's just a 90 degree angle from there to get true north. It's the precision that's baffling.

Also, the Great Pyramid is positioned remarkably close to latitude 30 or exactly 1/3 of the way from the equator to the North Pole. Its precise latitude is 29.9792 degrees N, which is crazy considering the speed of light in a vacuum is 299,792,458 m/s. This could be mere coincidence, but recall that a "meter" was originally defined to be one ten millionth of the length of the meridian that runs from the North Pole through Paris to the equator.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49941690)

Is there a reason for holding knowledge of these things back, or is it academic inertia and hubris in your view?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49941797)

I also believe in some aspects of the Tartaria conspiracy theory / except unfortunately a lot of the people who are proponents of this are retards. I think the Hindu concept of having numerous prior civilizations is certainly possible.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49943938)

I also think it can be argued without necessarily thinking that the stars directly influence us.

The stars were all mapped at a point in time and the initial map coincided with Earthly events that are cyclical in nature. i.e.) rise and fall of civilizations, overgrowth of society, wars, etc. These things all have a certain rhythm to them that is tied to the seasons and passing of time (and thus to the stars.) So whoever mapped this stuff initially would have been tying various constellations to events on the Earth.

I am trying to condense a fairly "large" thought, but hopefully My Dear Friends on XO get what I mean.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49944985)

the covenant with Abraham who was orginally Avram was becasue he offered to sacrifice his son who the stars had written he would be childless but then overturned the constellation by changing his name and God 'saved' Isaac by prividing the Ram to sacrifice instead so the entire lineage superceded the astrology

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5873163&forum_id=2most#49945034)