π¨π¨π¨ JUDGMENT ENTERED - BENZO NOT ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION π¨π¨π¨
| Turquoise Home | 06/30/26 | | misunderstood factory reset button boiling water | 06/30/26 | | Turquoise Home | 06/30/26 | | arrogant school cafeteria | 07/02/26 | | Turquoise Home | 07/02/26 | | massive bronze sound barrier jap | 07/02/26 | | Turquoise Home | 07/02/26 | | arrogant school cafeteria | 07/02/26 | | Turquoise Home | 07/02/26 | | arrogant school cafeteria | 07/02/26 | | puce native | 07/02/26 | | Contagious Seedy Mood | 07/02/26 | | puce native | 07/02/26 | | Turquoise Home | 07/02/26 | | arrogant school cafeteria | 07/02/26 | | Turquoise Home | 07/02/26 | | Taylor Swift is not a hobby she is a lifestyle | 07/12/26 | | Lesser of Two Weevils | 07/12/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: July 2nd, 2026 5:18 PM Author: Turquoise Home
AI doesnt know when the decision will be public:
Earliest realistic public release: shortly after July 30, 2026, if petitioner files no affidavit or files one that the special master promptly finds insufficient.
More likely: early to mid-August 2026, because the special master will need to review the affidavit, decide the redaction issue, and then have the final public version posted.
Possible later: late August or September 2026, if petitioner seeks an extension, respondent is allowed to respond to the affidavit, or the special master takes longer to resolve the redaction dispute.
The rules do not give a hard publication deadline once a redaction motion is pending. They say that where no redaction motion is filed, the full decision will be made public within a “reasonable time” after the 14-day redaction period expires. But that default provision does not cleanly answer this situation because a redaction motion was filed and remains unresolved.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5878703&forum_id=2most#49975964) |
|
|