Can Men Get Pregnant?
| frum aggressive nibblets | 05/04/22 | | Dead Territorial Orchestra Pit | 05/04/22 | | Rusted church building | 05/04/22 | | salmon candlestick maker messiness | 05/04/22 | | Rusted church building | 05/04/22 | | salmon candlestick maker messiness | 05/04/22 | | splenetic supple dopamine | 05/04/22 | | Pink swollen parlour cuckold | 05/04/22 | | Dead Territorial Orchestra Pit | 05/04/22 | | 180 vermilion garrison mental disorder | 05/04/22 | | harsh pocket flask | 01/14/26 | | harsh pocket flask | 01/14/26 | | harsh pocket flask | 01/15/26 | | harsh pocket flask | 01/15/26 | | harsh pocket flask | 01/19/26 | | nyuug | 01/20/26 | | nyuug | 01/25/26 | | nyuug | 01/25/26 | | Kink-friendly Alpha Institution | 01/14/26 | | insanely creepy glittery university | 01/15/26 | | Nubile red telephone | 01/15/26 | | Excitant Persian | 01/19/26 | | 6 7 | 01/25/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 4th, 2022 2:28 PM Author: Dead Territorial Orchestra Pit
"With our understanding constantly evolving, it’s important to honor the fact that one’s gender doesn’t determine whether they can become pregnant. Many men have had children of their own, and many more will likely do so in the future."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2most#44454608)
|
Date: May 4th, 2022 2:36 PM Author: salmon candlestick maker messiness
“To our knowledge, there has not yet been a case of pregnancy in [a biologically male] individual.”
Is the “to our knowledge” qualifier really necessary here?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2most#44454641) |
 |
Date: January 15th, 2026 7:18 PM Author: insanely creepy glittery university
Pregnancy via the abdominal cavity
It has also been suggested that it may be possible for AMAB folks to carry a baby in the abdominal cavity.
People have made this leap based on the fact that a very tiny percentage of eggs are fertilized outside of the uterus in what is known as an ectopic pregnancy.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2most#49592650) |
Date: January 15th, 2026 7:14 PM Author: Nubile red telephone
why won't shitlibs testifying before congress and scotus say what they mean: "man" and "woman" is purely psychological, can be chosen and changed at will by the individual, and is not subject to review. it is objectively meaningless. but then it's an invalid class for the purpose of the law - if you can't define it you can't distinguish it, and if you can't distinguish it you can't protect it. next up: whites start identifying as black on college applications and government contracts.
and why don't republicans just steal their language and define "woman" as "a person with a uterus and ovaries"? or "a person with xx chromosomes?"
this shit is so silly. what a joke of a country.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5101418&forum_id=2most#49592636) |
|
|