The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
A lot of medieval scholasticism was just taking the LSAT in reverse
| crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy | 08/10/26 |
| fighting step-uncle's house | 08/10/26 |
| crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy | 08/10/26 |
| fighting step-uncle's house | 08/10/26 |
| crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy | 08/10/26 |
| beady-eyed private investor | 08/10/26 |
| crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy | 08/10/26 |
| Chocolate candlestick maker library | 08/10/26 |
| crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy | 08/10/26 |
| Heady Parlor | 08/10/26 |
| alcoholic school cafeteria karate | 08/10/26 |
| crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy | 08/10/26 |
| alcoholic school cafeteria karate | 08/10/26 |
| crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy | 08/10/26 |
| alcoholic school cafeteria karate | 08/10/26 |
| Heady Parlor | 08/10/26 |
| beady-eyed private investor | 08/10/26 |
| multi-colored mustard selfie quadroon | 08/10/26 |
| crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy | 08/10/26 |
| Hateful native really tough guy | 08/11/26 |
| crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy | 08/11/26 |
| Jared Baumeister | 09/11/26 |
| Junko Enoshima | 09/11/26 |
| Jared Baumeister | 09/11/26 |
| pumpkin spice latte autumn enjoyer | 09/11/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:18 PM Author: crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy The LSAT does all the writing for you, you just pick the right answer. In medieval dissertations you had to do all the writing, and you had to use LSAT logic to make your points. Your logic had to be tight at each step. It didn't matter what you were writing about, you had to score a 180. There couldn't be any gaps in your reasoning. Even if you were just writing about a medicinal plant from the Dutch Indies, you had to go out of your way to prove your command of formal logic. They did this in the middle east for a long time too. Persians thought you had to show your command of LSAT logic before you could say anything else. Descartes didn't invent nuthin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059531) |
 |
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:20 PM Author: fighting step-uncle's house dont like this because extreme smarts like me take too big steps that normals cant rly follow so its unfair (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059539) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:33 PM Author: crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy That's fine, we'll just let you publish in the vernacular so that you'll be the smartest author anyone can pick up and read (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059593) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:38 PM Author: fighting step-uncle's house can u explain descartes meaning here? and why did the rhetoric ppl all study religion if they are suppose to be logical (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059607) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:47 PM Author: crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy Butterfly effect of Constantine's conversion (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059623) |
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:19 PM Author: beady-eyed private investor 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059535) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:20 PM Author: crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy In the classroom and in writing, it often takes the form of explicit disputation: a topic drawn from the tradition is broached in the form of a proposition on a question to be debated, oppositional responses are given, a counterproposal is argued and oppositional arguments rebutted. Because of its emphasis on rigorous dialectical method, scholasticism was eventually applied to many other fields of study.[6][7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:20 PM Author: Chocolate candlestick maker library The last sentence there definitely follows from the rest! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059541) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:37 PM Author: crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy Philosopher Johann Beukes has suggested that from 1349 to 1464, the era between the deaths of William of Ockham and Nicholas of Cusa, there was a distinct period characterized by "robust and independent philosophers" who departed from high scholasticism on issues such as institutional criticism and materialism but retained scholasticism's method. These philosophers include Marsilius of Padua, Thomas Bradwardine, John Wycliffe, Catherine of Sienna, Jean Gerson, Gabriel Biel and ended with Nicholas of Cusa.[30]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholasticism |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:08 PM Author: Heady Parlor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059694) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:52 PM Author: alcoholic school cafeteria karate Are you sure? have you read the wikipedia entry for Scholasticism yet? It's all in there. QED. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059635) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:01 PM Author: crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy Mastery of syllogistic reasoning was your ticket into the club. It was necessary, but no one said it was sufficient to do anything, just like no one thinks a perfect LSAT score qualifies you to practice law. Descartes whined that "but syllogistic reasoning isn't enough," but in order to make that argument Descartes also had to demonstrate his mastery of syllogistic reasoning. And here we are in the 21st century still taking the LSAT.
So what was Descartes really trying to say? What's he got to teach us right now? |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:04 PM Author: alcoholic school cafeteria karate what (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059680) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:06 PM Author: crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy Descartes was saying syllogistic reasoning can't get you to true knowledge. But anyone trying to figure out who John the Baptist was could have told you the same thing (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059689) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:10 PM Author: alcoholic school cafeteria karate Oh ok cool (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059707) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:03 PM Author: Heady Parlor cr! x, y, z, ... ... ... it was all the persians (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059674) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 10:03 PM Author: beady-eyed private investor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059675) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 9:49 PM Author: multi-colored mustard selfie quadroon I like how THE LOGIC led St. Augustin to conclude that the saints in heaven enjoy watching the torments of sinners in hell. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059631) |
|
Date: August 10th, 2026 11:38 PM Author: crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_for_the_Direction_of_the_Mind (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50059959) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 5:57 AM Author: Hateful native really tough guy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50060248) |
|
Date: August 11th, 2026 7:25 PM Author: crystalline cowardly trailer park ladyboy https://i.imgur.com/7OT3nXm.png (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50062017) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2026 6:26 PM Author: Jared Baumeister (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50130617) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2026 6:34 PM Author: Junko Enoshima Medieval logic wasn't quite like the logic we know today. I think only the Categories and De Interpretatione were known to Latin Europe in the Middle Ages, and those deal more with the intersection between logic and natural language. A typical concept in medieval logic was the "supposition," the way a substantive word can refer to multiple objects. For example, "man" can refer to any single man currently living, but it was considered a puzzle how "man" could also refer to a man who was once alive, or a man who will be born in the future: the process by which "man" could stand for a past or future man was called "ampliation." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50130629) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2026 6:35 PM Author: Jared Baumeister LSAT logic is just as arbitrary in what it considers "formal". We got locked into our present mode of legal reasoning because we took religion out of the picture, mostly. There used to be a lot religious law mixed in with secular law. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50130630) |
|
Date: September 11th, 2026 6:37 PM Author: pumpkin spice latte autumn enjoyer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5891715&forum_id=2most#50130632) |