@TheJusticeDept

issued an opinion today explaining that disparate-impact liability under federal employment law is *unconstitutional*. This is an earthquake in federal civil rights law. If right, this is the foundation to overturn that pernicious regime.

he Supreme Court recently explained that we have a "colorblind Constitution." This opinion explains what is needed. First, business necessity is a *low bar* to defend against disparate impact. Second, causality is a *high bar* for plaintiffs. But the third requirement is👀

"Third, plaintiffs must establish with particular evidence that there is an available alternative practice that causes less disparate impact and would be equally effective for serving the employer’s valid business purpose." Louisiana v. Callais for employment law. Amazing!

The whole opinion is necessary reading. But I always appreciate a nice summation conclusion. This single paragraph helps to contextualize everything that came before. Read while it's hot!

Kudos to

@ElliotGaiser

and

@joshjcraddock

for putting together this logical, concise, and frankly devastating opinion for defenders of the old, illegal disparate impact regime. Great news for civil rights warrior

@andrealucasEEOC

too!

https://x.com/EWess92/status/2064380775542464920

Did you get what you voted for, Trumpkins?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5872499&forum_id=2most#49925575)

Also, ljl at this shit where it was constitutional according to DOJ for furking decades and now cause Orange Man in office its not. Furking clown country

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5872499&forum_id=2most#49925600)

https://www.justice.gov/olc/media/1444871/dl

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5872499&forum_id=2most#49925780)