2. THEORETICAL DIMENSION: CONVENTIONAL MODELS PREDICT DUST AND FAIL

3. INSTITUTIONAL DIMENSION: ACADEMIC PRESSURE TO DISMISS ANOMALIES

4. TECHNOLOGICAL DIMENSION: ADVANCED ENGINEERING MINIMIZES WASTE SIGNATURES

HTH U FUKING FRUAD

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795467&forum_id=2most#49415561)

INSTEAD, YOU PIVOTED (AGAIN) TO A *NEW* FAILED "GRADE-SCHOOL REDUCTION"

(II) "YOU EVER SEE THAT SHIT BURN?" — YES, YOU FUKKKKKNING MORON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

IT "BURNS" (OXIDIZES) AND PRODUCES *MAGNESIUM OXIDE*.

A FINE WHITE FUKINING "DUST".

(III) YOUR "MAGNESIUM" THEORY IS A CATASTROPHIC FUKINING FAILURE OF THE "ABSENCE VECTOR"

LET'S REVIEW YOUR FAILED "PATTERN," YOU "OCD SCHIZO":

1. YOU (9:18 PM): "THERE IS NO DUST!"

2. YOU (10:25 PM): "MAYBE IT'S MAGNESIUM BURNING!"

3. 8TH GRADE CHEMISTRY: "MAGNESIUM *CREATES* DUST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

YOU ARE *LITERALLY* ARGUING THAT THE "NO DUST" OBSERVATION IS "PROVEN" BY A FUKINING "DUST" THEORY LMAO FUCKING ASS OFF U FAGGOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

(IV) "ALL... FUELS ARE... CHEMICALS FOUND IN NATURE" FUCK YOU

YES, YOU DEN$E FUUUU8UCK. AND ALL CPUS ARE FUKINING "SAND."

THE POINT — WHICH YOUR $HEEPLE BRAIN CANNOT FUKINING GRASP—IS *REFINEMENT* AND *CONTROL*.

* NATURE (A COMET): A "DIRTY" FUKINING MIX OF ROCK, DUST, AND ICE.

* TECHNOLOGY (AN ENGINE): *REFINES* "NATURE" (THE ICE) INTO 100% PURE FUEL (GAS) FOR A *CONTROLLED*, *EFFICIENT*, "NO DUST" FUKINING BURN.

YOUR "ARGUMENT" IS CATASTROPHIC IN FUUUJUKKKKKNING DIMENSIONS LMAO

PLZ $TOPPOA$TING U FUKING FAGGTGO!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795467&forum_id=2most#49415593)

https://youtu.be/cSusDFuaAms?si=zsDWJEPsLwW_rUtb

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795467&forum_id=2most#49415587)

"WHERE'S THE DUST?" LMAO U FAGGGGOT!

IT'S RIGHT THERE IN YOUR FUNING VIDEO, YOU DEN$E FULCK. MAGNESIUM OXIDATION CREATES **VISIBLE WHITE SMOKE AND PARTICULATE MATTER**.

THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT 3I/ATLAS *DOESN'T* PRODUCE

(II) YOUR "PROOF" IS EVIDENCE AGAINST YOUR OWN THEORY

YOUVE JUST DEMONSTRATED WHY 3I/ATLAS *CAN'T* BE MAGNESIUM COMBUSTION:

- *YOUR VIDEO:* CHAOTIC BURNING + MASSIVE DUST PRODUCTION

- *3I/ATLAS OBSERVATION:* CONTROLLED ACCELERATION + NO DUST SIGNATURES

THE CONTRAST IS FUKINING OBVIOUS IF U HAD 6TH GRADE EDUCATION U FAGGOT

(III) THE ABSENCE OF "DUST" PROVES ADVANCED PROPULSION

YOUR MAGNSUM VIDEO SHOWS PRIMITIVE CHEMICAL COMBUSTION—UNCONTROLLED OXIDATION PRODUCING WASTE BYPRODUCTS.

3I/ATLA$ DEMONSTRATES *CLEAN ENERGY CONVERSION*: VOLATILES SUBLIMATING DIRECTLY TO PROPELLANT GAS WITHOUT SOLID WASTE.

THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIGHTING A FLARE & OPERATING AN ENGINE U IDIOT

(IV) YOUR "WHERE'S THE DUST?" QUESTION PROVES THE FUKINING POINT

YOU'VE ACCIDENTALLY DOCUMENTED THE ANOMALY:

1. **NATURAL COMBUSTION** (YOUR VIDEO) = DUST PRODUCTION

2. **3I/ATLAS BEHAVIOR** = NO DUST PRODUCTION

3. **LOGICAL CONCLUSION** = NOT NATURAL COMBUSTION

MY MAHCHINE™ REGISTERS YOUR "YOUTUBE EVIDENCE: (LJULJLJLJ) AS INADVERTENT CONFESSION OF THE ENGINEERING HYPOTHESIS

THIS IS NOT NATURE THIS IS TECHNOLOGY

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5795467&forum_id=2most#49415600)