If we are being real Claude Fable is smarter than humans
| dashing silver point | 07/10/26 | | white theater | 07/10/26 | | dashing silver point | 07/10/26 | | white theater | 07/11/26 | | Cobalt parlour friendly grandma | 07/10/26 | | Green multi-colored stage becky | 07/10/26 | | Deep Senate Gay Wizard | 07/10/26 | | dashing silver point | 07/10/26 | | Aqua Stimulating Kitchen Double Fault | 07/10/26 | | Deep Senate Gay Wizard | 07/10/26 | | Aqua Stimulating Kitchen Double Fault | 07/10/26 | | dashing silver point | 07/10/26 | | Aqua Stimulating Kitchen Double Fault | 07/10/26 | | dashing silver point | 07/10/26 | | Aqua Stimulating Kitchen Double Fault | 07/10/26 | | dashing silver point | 07/10/26 | | Aqua Stimulating Kitchen Double Fault | 07/10/26 | | dashing silver point | 07/10/26 | | Aqua Stimulating Kitchen Double Fault | 07/10/26 | | dashing silver point | 07/11/26 | | Green multi-colored stage becky | 07/10/26 | | Aqua Stimulating Kitchen Double Fault | 07/10/26 | | diverse selfie | 07/10/26 | | transparent talented elastic band telephone | 07/10/26 | | plum masturbator bbw | 07/10/26 | | dashing silver point | 07/11/26 | | plum masturbator bbw | 07/11/26 | | Mischievous area puppy | 07/10/26 | | Histrionic roommate alpha | 07/11/26 | | insanely creepy dragon | 07/11/26 | | dashing silver point | 07/11/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: July 10th, 2026 9:39 PM Author: dashing silver point
yeah I think there are cognitive and knowledge domains humans can still beat it in. but the relevant comparison isn't whether it defeats the best mathematician at mathematics or the best systems programmer at systems programming. It's whether any individual human can match its aggregate performance across a sufficiently broad distribution of tasks under comparable time and tool constraints. Probably not.
And yeah I agree with you there are plenty of tasks still outside the domain of text-based systems. But I think it can do more than just logic and computer math.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2~#49992146)
|
 |
Date: July 10th, 2026 10:01 PM Author: dashing silver point
How's this from Deep Seek:
Argumentum de malo ut privatione
P1. Omne ens, inquantum ens, bonum est.
P2. Quidquid positive est, aliquam perfectionem sive bonitatem habet.
P3. Malum, inquantum malum, bono opponitur.
C1. Ergo malum, inquantum malum, non est ens positivum.
P4. Malum tamen non est mera negatio; nam non omnis absentia boni malum est.
P5. Malum est absentia boni debiti in subiecto quod naturaliter illius boni capax est.
P6. Absentia boni debiti in subiecto capaci privatio dicitur.
C2. Ergo malum est privatio boni debiti in subiecto bono.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2~#49992192) |
 |
Date: July 11th, 2026 12:32 AM Author: plum masturbator bbw
people r anxious about AI because they don't understand knowledge. effective altruist dorks believe some combination of 1) all things that can be thought are deterministic and can be "solved" and 2) humans exist as an animalistic version of reason. and so AI destroys not just the role of humans on earth but the very notion of scarcity even beyond the material world. nothing "new" can exist in a world where everything is implicitly solved simply because it can be conceived, since we now have the means to get from conception to resolution for anything that could exist in nous. it gigafries their idea of everything about existence and this is why tech types are the most anxious, not just because they're the ones losing jobs but they have no other frame for human existence.
on the other end people understand the idea that AI can be trained only on what exists and therefore think AI can never be anything more than the apotheosis of reddit plus maybe a fancy calculator for top mathematicians.
and they are correct that AI is limited because it cannot e.g. create and assert things sui generis but they do not respect the deterministic nature of reason like the math nerds do. and the math nerds on the other hand erroneously think you can reason your way to aristotle and kant and nietzche and the chrystler building from nothing (or equivalently that there is no meaningful difference between good, insightful art and bad art, because they are tasteless dorks). everyone is just projecting their prejudices of their notion of the human onto this technology.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5881654&forum_id=2~#49992414) |
|
|