The literature in that area is likely crowded due to boomers exhausting the era where you could pull any random half baked idea out of your ass and make a career out of it. But I'm sure there is still room for you to carve out a niche. Even if you can't find something truly original, you can always go for a novel synthesis where the pieces exist and you are connecting them. So yes you should.
Date: August 16th, 2026 4:06 PM Author: Metaphysical Animal
Do you think due to the rampant prejudice against C.G. Jung that I would have a hard time writing my Thesis on the interconnectedness of the Whiteheadian ontology and the Jungian Psychoid?
The Cambridge Companion to Jung itself acknowledges that Jung’s core texts have historically been poorly represented on university reading lists, and I think it is a tragedy that such a historically rare and brilliant mind has been systematically excluded considering the tremendous cultural and intellectual gifts he has to give us. But I think if you put yourself in a position where you are doing comparative work instead of directly defending Jung's speculative psychology as established metaphysics there is real room to carve out a niche here.
Date: August 16th, 2026 4:13 PM Author: Metaphysical Animal
thank you i really appreciate your considered insights on this topic of most importance to my professional (and personal) journey towards wholeness through individuation in the Godhead.