\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

why is Scholasticism the boogeyman of Philosophy

is it because it's true
Coral low-t skinny woman sweet tailpipe
  07/13/26
The rhetorical need for a historical boogeyman. Many differe...
Milky outnumbered locale queen of the night
  07/13/26
Oh damn should I do this with my predecessors
Coral low-t skinny woman sweet tailpipe
  07/13/26
Bet
Milky outnumbered locale queen of the night
  07/13/26
Historically, bad Latin and uncritical reading of "auth...
passionate hateful point
  07/13/26
The Aristotelian claim that substances possess irreducible f...
The Penis
  07/13/26
Rupert Sheldrake discussed this
everything is larp
  07/13/26
The stuff he says about Aristotle is legit. Some of the stuf...
The Penis
  07/13/26
...
everything is larp
  07/13/26


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:17 PM
Author: Coral low-t skinny woman sweet tailpipe

is it because it's true

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2~#49997960)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:27 PM
Author: Milky outnumbered locale queen of the night

The rhetorical need for a historical boogeyman. Many different groups benefitted from portraying their predecessors as sterile schoolmen.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2~#49997987)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:28 PM
Author: Coral low-t skinny woman sweet tailpipe

Oh damn should I do this with my predecessors

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2~#49997989)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:33 PM
Author: Milky outnumbered locale queen of the night

Bet

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2~#49997997)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:34 PM
Author: passionate hateful point

Historically, bad Latin and uncritical reading of "authorities" based on incomplete or corrupt corpora, and then materialism in the natural sciences proved so powerful that the idea that substantial forms have any causal power was almost entirely abandoned.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2~#49998000)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:52 PM
Author: The Penis

The Aristotelian claim that substances possess irreducible forms that ground their identity, unity and directed activities still has not been decisively refuted by science. I think at the very least a naturalized account of form as causally efficacious organization is highly plausible, while the stronger scholastic ontology remains a live but unverified interpretation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2~#49998043)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:54 PM
Author: everything is larp

Rupert Sheldrake discussed this

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2~#49998046)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:59 PM
Author: The Penis

The stuff he says about Aristotle is legit. Some of the stuff he says regarding biology is obviously crankery, but actually not bad if taken as metaphor.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2~#49998061)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 13th, 2026 10:54 PM
Author: everything is larp



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5882508&forum_id=2~#49998047)