Date: September 6th, 2015 1:45 PM Author: federal set
Muslims have pretty good chances of winning those suits. The EEOC has taken their side by arguing that as long as there is a work-around that doesn't cost much money to the employer, the employer must accommodate. The EEOC argues that it's entirely different than retail discrimination based upon a forbidden motive. The federal and state laws go a long way in protecting religious motivations in other cases.
you know what is truly weird about this is that even though alcohol is illegal in muslim countries, they still all secretly make it in the home distilleries and have parties and shit with wine and beer, they just dont publicly admit it or rat out their neighbors
Date: September 6th, 2015 3:53 PM Author: erotic fanboi doctorate
As Western Civilization has amply demonstrated over the last 20 years, maintaining public/private double standards concerning behavior that results in deleterious consequences, such as the one you mentioned, serves an important civic purpose.
Date: September 6th, 2015 1:48 PM Author: cracking boiling water
Stanley, 40, started working for ExpressJet nearly three years ago. About two years ago she converted to Islam. This year she learned her faith prohibits her from not only consuming alcohol but serving it, too, Masri said.
Date: September 6th, 2015 2:11 PM Author: Sooty tanning salon
Oh fuck I wasn't even following this case beyond the headlines on facebook. I thought she was just some lady working the desk at some city building who refused to file some papers. I was wondering why the fuck it was a big deal.
Thank you for clarifying.
That said, not sure why OP is comparing the situation to the Muslim air hostess. There are a thousand things that are different.
Date: September 6th, 2015 2:03 PM Author: pink degenerate hell
it's an elected position. in my state that means it's a constitutional position, would need to be removed through some impeachment-style process. i'm sure there's a method but presumably it's not as easy as bringing in teh donald to say ur fired.
Date: September 6th, 2015 3:14 PM Author: Floppy round eye place of business
god damn r u really this dumb? she was held in contempt of a federal court order and the judge put her in jail as a result.. he cld have also sanctioned her financially instead...
Date: September 6th, 2015 3:56 PM Author: erotic fanboi doctorate
Nah, she is a somewhat dull, low effort poster who posts stream of conscience ramblings, and whenever anyone calls her out, she disappears or says lol flame.
Date: September 6th, 2015 3:18 PM Author: pink degenerate hell
it's not normal for elected officials to be impeached or to go to jail. are you asking whether it's normal for an elected official to go to jail but avoid impeachment? no, but this is not a normal case. she hasn't broken any criminal laws, which is why people usually go to jail (and why most elected officials get impeached). this is a civil matter.
anyway, she hasn't been impeached, which is within the discretion of... idk, the ky legislature probably. presumably the people who could do that don't want to.
she was ordered to do something by a court. she flatly refused. that's contempt anywhere in are country, and if the judge thinks that jail is the only way to cure the contempt your ass goes to the slammer.
correct. because her refusal is based on religious reasons, i think the proper course is to suspend any sentence, let her argue her case in the court system, and either let her continue to work with someone else handling gay marriages or suspend her with pay.
no employment atty, but that's how i think these types of things generally play out.
Date: September 6th, 2015 3:12 PM Author: Floppy round eye place of business
LOL so if a Christian doesnt want to perform fag marriages that is her religious LIBERTY but if a Muslim doesnt want to serve alcohol that is anti western and barbaric.
Date: September 6th, 2015 3:22 PM Author: Floppy round eye place of business
lol its exactly the same.. if she were a christian and didnt want to serve a fag couple on the plane ANYTHING cause she hates fags cause of her "religion" then christian activists wld be up in arms protecting her RIGHT .. its same with wedding cake bullshit
Date: September 6th, 2015 3:26 PM Author: pink degenerate hell
a public official refusing to follow the LAW OF THE LAND is not the same as a private individual's request for a religious accommodation from a private company. u seem retarded to day. more than usual i mean.
the gay wedding cake/muslim serving alcohol is much better analogy (not to the EEOC of course) but that's not what you said in your first poast.
Date: September 6th, 2015 3:27 PM Author: Floppy round eye place of business
its similar to the baking cake bullshit and u really think conturds wld not be up in arms if this was a christian flight attendant refusing to serve a gay couple that was dressed in some faggy clothing? give me a break, FAGGOT
Date: September 6th, 2015 5:24 PM Author: razzmatazz main people
LOL at accepting justice Kennedy's dillusional visions about penumbras emanations as "the law of the land." People need to start ignoring bullshit SCOTUS opinions. The constitution did not give the Supreme Court a monopoly on deciding what is constitutional (the court itself decided it had that power and everyone just went along with it).
Date: September 6th, 2015 5:27 PM Author: burgundy odious church building blood rage
Fuck Muslims. Fuck their religious interests. Ban Islam now. This is not an inconsistent position w/not forcing gay cakes. Islam = evil. Christianity = not my thing, but we can tolerate it.
Date: September 6th, 2015 7:31 PM Author: vivacious insecure idea he suggested
sooo to recap: we now know that-routinely and indeed as a matter of course-there are devout muslim flight attendants flitting around on commercial 747 flights, logging ten thousand air miles a day, bopping through cursory inspections in the expedited security line, and just constantly surveying and observing in a detached but purposeful manner...noting routines, patterns, behavioral characteristics, vulnerabilities arising from cut corners, and so on and so on ...
but yeah, obviouly the key issue is whether they'll fetch you a double wild turkey and coke.