Date: December 6th, 2015 1:28 AM Author: Carmine cerebral organic girlfriend athletic conference
Completely false on both counts. If the charges were "trumped up," why has he been hiding out at the Ecuadorian embassy in London for the last five years rather than going back to Sweden to face questioning?
Also the charges have not been dropped, which is why he's still in hiding. The statute of limitations ran out on some of the lesser claims but the SOL on the rape claim doesn't expire until 2020.
Date: December 5th, 2015 10:34 PM Author: Flickering Mediation
the jeff gannon homofaggot hooker scandal during the bush years that the lib media normally would have been all over but hushed up after it started to get into bipartisan gay pedofaggotry.
Date: December 6th, 2015 12:42 AM Author: mind-boggling station idiot
Yep. Call boys hanging out at the white house during the Carter, Reagan, and Bush years but no media coverage after one single Washington Times article.
Date: December 5th, 2015 10:45 PM Author: Mint bipolar parlour alpha
lol yea.
Albert became the focus of a media frenzy in 1997, when he went on trial for felony charges of forcible sodomy.[17] A 42-year-old woman named Vanessa Perhach[18] accused Albert of throwing her on a bed, biting her, and forcing her to perform oral sex after a February 12, 1997 argument in his Pentagon City hotel room. DNA testing linked Albert to genetic material taken from the bite marks and from semen in Perhach's underwear.[19] During the trial, testimony was presented from another woman, Patricia Masden, who told the jury that Albert had bitten her on two different occasions in 1993 and 1994 in Miami and Dallas hotels, which she viewed as unwanted sexual advances.[20] Masden claimed that in Dallas, Albert called her to his hotel room to help him send a fax, only for her to find him wearing "white panties and garter belt"
Date: December 5th, 2015 10:49 PM Author: thirsty french hell love of her life
bryan singer and a number of other powerful gay hollywood moguls essentially admitted to having decadent fuck parties with drugged-out rent boys who were coerced into all kinds of shit. everyone was like "this is news?"
Date: December 5th, 2015 10:56 PM Author: thirsty french hell love of her life
not that michael jackson isn't discussed, but there is a bunch of hilarious shit from the testimony and when they searched his house.
he had a huge collection of old school stroke mags, and i don't mean vintage, he apparently just liked beating off to cheap and shitty glossies. he had all kinds of porn around his bedroom area, which was supposedly kind of drab and hoarder-ish.
Date: December 6th, 2015 1:19 AM Author: Rusted hilarious range
The story is rather tragic. I do believe that had the internet existed in 1994 in it's current form, Jackson would still be alive today. Jackson was very much the victim of public perception. Yes, he was clearly an eccentric with many quirks, but the "child molestation" thing was hogwash. GQ published a non-bias article in 1994 entitled "Was Michael Jackson Framed?" that you can find all over the net. Here's one link: http://floacist.wordpress.com/2007/08/22/gq-article-was-michael-jackson-framed/ ... It's a pretty fascinating read that details exactly what happened during that first accusation. Most people haven't read it, though... because it's easier and more "interesting" (and at the time, "funnier") to imagine him as some kind of freak.
Anyone unfamiliar with what actually happened there, I'd really recommend reading it. The TL;DR: version is pretty god damn fucked up. He befriended a young boy, his mother and step-father. The biological father wanted money to produce "Robin Hood Men In Tights" so he brainwashed his son with sodium Amytal in an attempt to extort money out of Jackson... knowing full-well he wouldn't want to go through a long career-tarnishing trial. There's taped conversations between the father and step-father where the father lays out his entire plan. > “And if I go through with this, I win big-time. There’s no way I lose. I’ve checked that inside out. I will get everything I want, and they will be destroyed forever. June will lose [custody of the son]…and Michael’s career will be over.”
My point is, public perception in 1994 was so heavily dependent on shock media, magazine covers, radio, talk show monologues, etc. Had Reddit existed back then, we would have seen the smoking gun. People would be chatting over the details on a daily basis. It would have been very difficult for the public to remain that misinformed and warped by rumor and heresay.
But the perception stuck. And clearly it weighed heavily on Jackson... someone who had dedicated his life to helping children in need. He was clearly depressed. He turned to drugs. As we later found out, he needed to be medicated to even sleep. I can't imagine what that had to have been like..
That was the only time anyone ever accused Jackson of wrongdoing... until 11 years later in 2005, but this time it was CLEARLY bullshit and a clear attempt at extortion. Anyone following that trial was aware of how ridiculous the claims were. I'll summarize. It was right after the huge documentary "Living with Michael Jackson" that Martin Bashir did. Jackson was all over the news for the "baby dangling" incident. In the documentary, it showed that Jackson took in a young cancer patient, his mother and sister and was paying for the boy's treatment (last I heard, he's now cancer-free). He was close with the boy and the family. It made the news, because of the scene where Jackson says, "What's wrong with sharing a bed with someone you love?" in reference to the young boy. The public took it (or twisted it) to be a sexual thing... Jackson intended it as an innocent remark... hanging out late playing video games on a massive bed and someone passes out. Inappropriate? Maybe. Molestation? No. Anyways... the mother of the boy had been in and out of mental institutions and had attempted to con money from celebrities in the past (the reason for Jay Leno and George Lopez being at the trial). She also claimed her family had been "sexually fondled" by JC Penny security after her punk kids shoplifted... she settled out of court for $152k. So anyhow, the Bashir documentary was a shitshow, people like Gloria Allred were petitioning to have Jackson's kids taken away... and Jackson's handlers told him to distance himself from the young boy and the family... so he cut them off. It was only after that, that the woman and the boy accused Jackson of misconduct. The funny part was, they literally claimed the molestation started AFTER the documentary aired. As if Jackson hung out with the kid, let them live at Neverland, passed out playing videogames, filmed a documentary admitting that it was innocent... and then when the entire world started looking at the relationship with a magnifying glass and wanted to take away Jackson's kids (and apparently the family had already been interviewed by police)... THAT's when Jackson decided to start molesting the kid. Come on... Whole thing was a crock of shit. The woman also claimed they were held hostage at Neverland... to which they pulled up the creditcard receipts showing all the shopping sprees she was doing with Jackson's money during the "kidnapping". At one point they point out, "How could you be kidnapped if you were shopping at Nordstroms, Tiffanys... here's a receipt for a body wax". The woman snapped back , "IT WASN'T A BODY WAX!!! IT WAS A LEG WAX!! HE'S LYING TO YOU!!!" .... Total shitshow. Read up on it. It's was fucked. You can read most of this on wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Michael_Jackson
That 2005 Trial doesn't happen without the 1993 situation. It was the same DA (Tom Sneddon) who tried to get Jackson in 1993 that was pushing for the 2005 thing. It was only mildly plausible, because of the 1993 thing. They tried to find other boys to step forward (out of the thousands who Jackson had been in contact with over the years) and nobody stepped forward. They had a former body guard (who had sold his story to National Enquirer and had previously been arrested for armed robbery) claim he saw Jackson blowing Macauley Culkin in a shower... they brought Culkin up there to respond and he's like, "WUT?" ... As one journalist put it:
>"the trial featured perhaps the most compromised collection of prosecution witnesses ever assembled in an American criminal case...the chief drama of the trial quickly turned into a race to see if the DA could manage to put all of his witnesses on the stand without getting any of them removed from the courthouse in manacles.""
Nobody following that trial was surprised by the outcome.
It's some sad stuff, man. Despite this, the perception stuck. People continued to hate him and paint him as a monster. People continued to take the rumors and tabloid gossip as truth... and I think ultimately it killed him.
Date: December 6th, 2015 11:29 AM Author: green swashbuckling resort
Sorry bud, Jacko was a freak. At the end of the day, when multiple accusers have come forward and described his penis, when multiple staff members have testified they saw molestation, when its admitted he has slumber parties with kids as a 40 year old, when its admitted he gave them alcohol, when he had an alarm for his bedroom, he's definitely doing inappropriate shit to at least some of the kids.
Basically your entire defense is, "he wasn't a pedophile, he was just taking the classic steps of grooming a child and multiple greedy parents took advantage!"
Perhaps you could think there was still a sliver of doubt, but the fact that Wade Robson came forward a couple of years ago and admitted Jackson molested him is the death nail. He's a successful married famous guy and combined with everything else proves it.
Date: December 6th, 2015 11:33 AM Author: animeboi
Boys Will Be Boys included pictures of boys, many naked, in various non-sexual activities such as climbing a tree or sitting on a bench. The book had an inscription reading, "To Michael: From your fan. Love XXXOOO Rhonda – 1983, Chicago."[57] Wade Robson testified he considered Boys Will Be Boys "not a pornographic book," and said he would not be concerned about its owner being in the same bed with a 12-year-old.[57] Another book, The Boy: A Photographic Essay, was inscribed, "Look at the true spirit of happiness and joy in these boys' faces. This is the spirit of boyhood, a life I never had and will always dream of. This is the life I want for my children. MJ." The book contained pictures of boys in various situations by different photographers, including pictures taken during the filming of the 1963 Lord of the Flies film and showed the boys on the set, usually clothed but sometimes nude, playing in the sand, reading comic books, and having pillow fights.[58][59] The only book depicting male sex acts was a rare, out-of-print book called A Sexual Study of Man which featured many images of adult men engaged in all kinds of homosexual intercourse.[57] Robson said he would be concerned if the book's owner were to share his bed with a boy, but amended that he would not mind if he considered the total picture of all the material in question.[57] Robson testified that he believed Jackson had a "sexual interest in women," and that he had never seen "anything that suggested pedophilia" at Neverland.[57]
Date: December 6th, 2015 12:51 AM Author: Flickering Mediation
kind of an older one, but how about the fairly good case that pearl harbor wasn't a surprise for the US government, and that military officials intentionally put older ships they wanted to scrap anyway in the harbor along with inexperienced recruits as bait while their actual decent ships and experienced sailors were elsewhere?
Date: December 6th, 2015 12:57 AM Author: spectacular ivory sneaky criminal goyim
didn't Art Bell's son get kidnapped and raped, and one of his wives die of an asthma attack, then he bought a asian bride a few weeks later or something?
Date: December 6th, 2015 9:28 AM Author: cordovan titillating depressive point
The LIBOR Scandal. Britain's banks fucked the world out of QUADRILLIONS of dollars and it was in the news for perhaps three days. I guarantee you that nobody you mention this to in casual conversation will know about it.
This guy made a video called "daisy's destruction" that shows a 3 year old girl being sexually abused. The movie is somewhat of a 'meme' on the chans and occasionally there will be drama where someone will post it on /b/ and mods will be called in to ban the offending poster.
Also he ended up 'accidentally' killing one of the girls he molested.
There's another one where a bunch of rich dudes were alleged to be operating a pedo ring but I couldn't find the article.
Date: December 6th, 2015 11:45 AM Author: smoky double fault theatre
Wasn't there some story a while back about a fat Disney producer who allegedly fucked dozens of Disney tv starlets, including a lot who went on to be famous?
Also some story involving Clinton, Richard Posner and some billionaire's sex island?
But what no one still talks about, which was even bigger than the pedo daycare hysteria, was the recovered memories of child abuse hysteria of the late 80s/early 90s. There's not even a wikipedia article on it.
No, the article talks about daycare pedo hysteria, which involved manipulating little kids into making up false abuse stories. Recovered memory hysteria was about "hypnotherapists" manipulating adult patients into "recovering" false abuse stories.
Date: December 6th, 2015 6:57 PM Author: Ungodly trip forum hominid
Apparently in Louisiana there actually was a weird day care run by Satanists who molested/raped the kids or something. Served as the inspiration for True Detective.
Date: December 6th, 2015 2:01 PM Author: brilliant black woman gaping
Believe it or not, last week, a Muslim individual and his Muslim wife massacred scores of Americans in San Bernardino, California after pledging allegiance to ISIS.
Date: December 6th, 2015 4:47 PM Author: Sapphire Rebellious Preventive Strike Church
how about the fact that the 2001 anthrax attacks were never actually resolved, and that the case against bruce ivins is shaky at best, and that the FBI was awfully eager to "close" the file right after he committed "suicide"? and this was AFTER they spent years persecuting dr. hatfill, who had no relation at all to the murders.
so who are the feds covering for, and why?
also, this unsolved train derailment/attempted mass-murder from 1995 in arizona, which was only prevented from killing dozens by the fact that the train was going below its anticipated speed when it jumped the track:
Date: December 6th, 2015 5:58 PM Author: Flickering Mediation
what happened to that random bro who was stripped naked by cops during the boston bombing manhunt? that was never actually explained, though there are rumors that one of the cops was an actual faggot who got off on it.
Date: December 6th, 2015 7:01 PM Author: thirsty french hell love of her life
already discussed extensively here and elsewhere, largely figured out. never was a mainstream topic until years later when people ran across it on wikipedia.
- that he attended anti-white reverend wright's church for decades
- that he was a desciple of bill ayers (as was clinton)
---
No one talks about the terrible NATIONAL DEBT situation we're in.
No one talks about how republicans have lost on EVERY ISSUE they care about over the long run -- immigration, taxes, size of government, abortion, support our allies internationally, gay marriage, sex outside of wedlock, "morality" on TV/radio/culture, affirmative action, the list goes on and on. the ONLY exception so far has been gun rights, and that's the last thing republicans havn't lost on so far (obama to try to change that again tonight).