The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Amanda Carpenter just avoid affair question, "talk to my lawyer" Cruz = done.
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:17 PM Author: Chrome set Just on CNN. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133914) |
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:18 PM Author: Startled brunch Dude this is flame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133932) |
 |
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:19 PM Author: Chrome set Adriana Hough says to Carpenter “would you be willing to address the Nat’l Enquirer report in which you’ve been named…..”
Carpenter’s response was “….you can talk to my lawyer…” and the CNN host said she is not comfortable talking about a Nat’l Enquirer report “…so let’s move on….”
and ended her segment with “…well that conversation took a turn I was not anticipating…”....BREAKING |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:20 PM Author: Startled brunch Lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133946) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:21 PM Author: Alcoholic potus lol, way to spin it idiot. i watched that too and i enjoy the flame you're trying to pull here (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133955) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:21 PM Author: burgundy unhinged newt there's an alternative explanation that more clearly suggests legal counsel needs to be involved . . . (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134424) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:19 PM Author: arrogant razzmatazz ape (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133938) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:23 PM Author: At-the-ready Mewling Stage Turdskin https://twitter.com/Kris_Sacrebleu/status/713399104978587651 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133975) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:25 PM Author: arrogant razzmatazz ape (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133986) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:25 PM Author: Glittery citrine stock car got damn shes hot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133996) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:26 PM Author: crawly meetinghouse coffee pot Nothing said about "talk to my lawyer" in that clip. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133998) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:34 PM Author: Infuriating stubborn bbw alpha Which one is Amanda Carpenter?
The host or the other one in the small box? |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:20 PM Author: pearly digit ratio lol that anchor just slipped it in (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134414) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:24 PM Author: Silver telephone public bath tbf while I want this to be true it may be that she's referring all matters to her lawyer in anticipation of a defamation suit against NE, but idk she could just be covering for dat BCC (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133981) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:25 PM Author: Chrome set Uh, she's not going to lose an defamation suit by saying she didn't haven't sex w/ Cruz. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30133987) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:26 PM Author: Startled brunch (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134001) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:32 PM Author: Silver telephone public bath she might accidentally concede to facts that are the basis of the NE allegations that aren't about the affair, etc/etc (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134037) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:30 PM Author: Appetizing bossy idiot garrison dat BIG CUBANO COCK (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134025) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:28 PM Author: magical bistre corner Pending defamation action hth (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134013) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:24 PM Author: Canary Space Really Tough Guy (doesn't understand defamation) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134445) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:37 PM Author: burgundy unhinged newt Do you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134548) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:30 PM Author: Lime Ladyboy Elastic Band she was visibly shaken when it was brought up. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134027) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:31 PM Author: internet-worthy ocher business firm https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FzjXHABbbnA&feature=youtu.be (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134032) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:33 PM Author: Startled brunch OP pwnd, said it was false (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134042) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:36 PM Author: Infuriating stubborn bbw alpha Categorically false actually.
Just like Bill Clinton said. |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:38 PM Author: Alcoholic potus Or like those Duke lacrosse players. You're right. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134098) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:40 PM Author: Infuriating stubborn bbw alpha Or like Nixon. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134123) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 12:59 PM Author: heady stag film loling at #TedScrews (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134245) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2016 1:27 AM Author: comical center pretty funny that the host throws a shitfit and doesn't want to talk about it anymore because, OMG, she's discussed it on two shows, yet they'll spend a week beating any TRUMP-related issue into the ground with 24/7 coverage. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30139282) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:01 PM Author: amber violent step-uncle's house clown Flores hasn't written a thing on Twitter in the past 24 hours. You'd think if this wasn't true she'd jump right out and say so right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134257) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:04 PM Author: heady stag film her first call when this broke yesterday was probably to her lawyer. her lawyer would have told her not to say shit and that he would draft a statement for her to put out, and that they would then proceed to sue the shit out of the NE. that's how this would be handled if the story is false. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134280) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:06 PM Author: Infuriating stubborn bbw alpha No idiot. If it is truly false she should immediately deny it. That doesn't harm her defamation suit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134298) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:08 PM Author: heady stag film holy shit you're dumb. it might be in Ted Cruz's interest for it to be handled that way, but his campaign's interests aren't necessarily aligned with hers. if the story is bullshit and she has a legit legal case here, then what you described is exactly what you DON'T do from the plaintiff's perspective (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134314) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:14 PM Author: Infuriating stubborn bbw alpha State your IQ before I go further.
|
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:15 PM Author: heady stag film you have already lost this one. its time for you to quietly slink out the back door of the thread and hope nobody notices (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134361) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:15 PM Author: Infuriating stubborn bbw alpha CHECK YOU ELEMENTS OF DEFAMATION. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134366) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:18 PM Author: heady stag film liability and damages are distinct concepts. the longer the story runs, the more copies that are sold, the # of times NE repeats the claim, tweets about it, doubles down on it, etc., all contribute to the ultimate damage award in a case like this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134389) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:19 PM Author: Infuriating stubborn bbw alpha Whether the defamation has occurred for 12 hours or 36, you still have damages you fucking ape. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134396) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:22 PM Author: heady stag film the AMOUNT of the damages can vary you stupid shit. One measure of damages that many courts will accept in a case like this is awarding the P a % of revenues from the # of copies sold, # of website hits, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134425) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:23 PM Author: gold preventive strike you may be literally retarded. it's the amount of damages you can credibly claim. unless you're in florida there is a high bar for quantifying libel damages, even if the statement at issue is per se defamatory. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134439) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:25 PM Author: heady stag film NO DAMAGES ARE DAMAGES IF YOU PROVE LIBEL THEN YOU HAVE DAMAGES SO IT DOESNT MATTER MY STTTATE U LAW PROFESSOR EXPLAINED THIS CONCEPT CLEARLY (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134452) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:26 PM Author: Canary Space Really Tough Guy my god stfu already you unhinged libtard (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134457) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:26 PM Author: gold preventive strike there is zero chance this faggot is a lawyer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134461) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:27 PM Author: heady stag film well he should stfu then. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134464) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:25 PM Author: burgundy unhinged newt Gotta let those damages take effect. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134447) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:11 PM Author: gold preventive strike (actual retard) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134328) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:07 PM Author: amber violent step-uncle's house clown So a young professional woman's best strategy would be to leave an accusation made in public that she slept with a married man who is running for president in the political party that she's professionally associated with just hang out there for people and the press to speculate on? That makes a lot of sense. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134308) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:09 PM Author: heady stag film it hasn't even been 24 hours yet you stupid fuck. bump this thread on Sunday and then reflect on how the story has developed between now and then. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134320) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:13 PM Author: amber violent step-uncle's house clown Lol you're a little unhinged huh. Anyway what you're saying seems dumb from a practical standpoint. Also, she went to HLS so I assume she knows she's not going to fuck up any defamation case by saying the accusation isn't true. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134342) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:15 PM Author: Infuriating stubborn bbw alpha The guy above is a fucking moron.
Denying a defamatory statement does NOT harm a claim for defamation.
CHECK YOU ELEMENTS. |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:17 PM Author: heady stag film holy shit you're dumb. if its false and NE prints or even Tweets subsequent mentions of the story, that could be used as the basis for additional damages. The # of copies they sell could also be used as a measure of damages. Putting out a flat out denial right now gains you nothing as a plaintiff. That might be in Ted Cruz Campaign's interest but their interests aren't the same as hers as the plaintiff in a potential libel suit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134380) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:19 PM Author: amber violent step-uncle's house clown So this woman, who seems fairly driven, is going to say fuck it to everything she's accomplished, allowing her reputation to get dragged through the mud, so that she can maximize a potential defamation claim? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134399) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:20 PM Author: Infuriating stubborn bbw alpha Bro, it's already out there. You don't need to wait so it gets tweeted even more. It is already everywhere and meets the threshold for defamation. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134411) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:22 PM Author: internet-worthy ocher business firm I'm not a lawyer, so you tell me. How difficult would it be for any of them to win a defamation suit against NE given that NE didn't name names and blurred the pictures? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134427) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:27 PM Author: burgundy unhinged newt Slightly more difficult and no doubt why NE did exactly that. But could bite them on actual malice. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134470) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:31 PM Author: heady stag film that's one hurdle the plaintiff has to overcome but its minor imo. the photos were not degraded enough to hide their identities. it took twitter trolls 30 minutes to figure out who two of the 5 women were. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134495) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2016 4:19 AM Author: odious black rigpig (clearly not a lawyer) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30139619) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:17 PM Author: amber violent step-uncle's house clown Yeah I know. I mean I'm not at all sure she did anything but Jesus if I were any one of these people and the story isn't true you'd think they'd be putting that on blast. Kind of a shitty thing to be accused of in general but especially with someone as repulsive as Ted. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134382) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:20 PM Author: Flushed Curious Site Toaster No, you and all the non-lawyers in this thread are fucking morons.
If asked, any attorney with an IQ above 105 would categorically tell their client *not* to start tweeting stupid bullshit in this situation.
If you are actually considering a making legal claim, there is *nothing* to be gained by making a 160 character denial at this point. |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:22 PM Author: amber violent step-uncle's house clown Dude I think you might actually be an idiot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134431) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:27 PM Author: burgundy unhinged newt You might not be a lawyer. You're talking past each other. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134463) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:27 PM Author: amber violent step-uncle's house clown I am a lawyer. Although I'm a tranny lawyer, so I guess not really a lawyer. Anyway I just have a hard time given the context of who this particular person is that she'd opt to sit by silently with those accusations out there. She was on Rachel Maddox's show a couple nights ago so it's not like she's averse to saying shit in public. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134471) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:36 PM Author: burgundy unhinged newt What if the other four prove to be true? You want this to play itself out for a bit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134534) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:22 PM Author: heady stag film CR. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134435) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:26 PM Author: burgundy unhinged newt Cr. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134455) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:27 PM Author: tan passionate shrine (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134465) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:30 PM Author: boyish famous landscape painting libel lawyer buddy says that if amanda jumps into a public discussion and debate, it will immunize a lot of the discussion moving forward because her public discussion is itself news worthy.
credited or not? |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:32 PM Author: heady stag film it could arguably make her more of a public figure, in which case subsequent developments would be more difficult to classify as libel.
|
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:37 PM Author: burgundy unhinged newt Cr. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134543) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 1:45 PM Author: mauve excitant parlour Daddy is an annoying shitlib bitch but lol at the idiot pumos arguing with him itt, he is wrecking your holds (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30134603) |
|
Date: March 25th, 2016 4:56 PM Author: heady stag film I won this thread btw (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30136049) |
|
Date: March 26th, 2016 2:14 AM Author: abnormal wagecucks No, the reason she was easily discovered is because she's a public figure, being a former spokeswoman for a us senator and a regular cnn commentator, same goes for the other woman who was discovered. That others haven't been found because they aren't public figures.
Now, when it comes to actual malice, obviously, the story was directed at cruz, not them, and their pics were censored.
So, if it's anyone who is libeled, it's cruz, but the wording is carefully constructed in the article to make it seem like pure speculative innuendo, as you would see in celebrity stories, rather than factual statements. They covered their tracks. |
|
Date: March 26th, 2016 10:34 AM Author: abnormal wagecucks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30140213) |
|
Date: March 31st, 2016 9:08 PM Author: heady stag film im not arguing the merits of her case. im explaining that what she's doing is exactly what her lawyer would advise her to do if the story were false (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3175849&forum_id=2#30178918) |