Date: August 16th, 2019 10:59 AM Author: white frozen space rigpig
A teen walked out with a $2 beer. The store clerk shot him to death.
Meagan Flynn, The Washington Post Published 6:30 am PDT, Friday, August 16, 2019
Seventeen-year-old Dorian Harris was already on his way out the door when the store clerk, Anwar Ghazali, grabbed his gun, pointing it over the counter with two hands.
Harris had spent about seven seconds inside the store. The Top Stop Shop in Memphis was busy that night, about 10 p.m. on March 29, 2018, and when the unarmed teenager waltzed through the door, he didn't waste any time being sneaky. Dressed in purple pants and a hoodie, he grabbed a $2 beer from the shelf in plain view of Ghazali, turned and left, as the clerk raced around the counter.
Ghazali burst toward the door past bewildered customers milling near the counter. Beverly Loverson was one. She saw Harris and the beer, and Ghazali and the gun, "and as he passed me," she remembered while testifying on the stand this week, "I said: 'Don't kill him. Don't kill him. It's just a beer.'"
Ghazali spun around looking for Harris in the parking lot before spotting him bolting down the block. Ghazali took off at a sprint. He caught up and fired his gun, one, two, at least three times. Then, he went back to the store.
As he walked back inside he said, "I think I shot him," according to an arrest warrant, and returned to the cash register to ring up the next guest. He never called 911.
Two days later, Harris was found dead on the same block, collapsed in a man's backyard.
On Thursday, Ghazali was convicted of second-degree murder, marking the end of a tragic case that has sparked protests and boycotts and inflamed racial tensions in Memphis as hundreds mourned the African American teenager. Ghazali is set to be sentenced next month, facing between 15 and 60 years in prison.
"This defendant took it upon himself to be the judge, the jury and the executioner over a $2 beer," prosecutor Lora Fowler told the jury, according to footage of the trial from WMC-TV.
In the immediate aftermath of the 2018 shooting, dozens of protesters swarmed the parking lot of the Top Stop Shop, calling for a boycott of the business and forcing the store to barricade its doors. Family members and friends set up a memorial for Harris on the curb and dozens attended a candlelit vigil, holding "Black Lives Matter" and "Justice for Dorian" signs. One sign asked, "Is it worth it?" with a bottle of Steel Reserve beer drawn in the center.
The outcry caught the attention of Bernice King, daughter of Martin Luther King Jr., who was in town last year for the 50th anniversary of her father's assassination.
"Dear Memphis," wrote King, CEO of the King Center, "I'm here in your city. Dorian Harris should be here, too. If we don't value black lives and believe that Dorian's life is worth far more than an allegedly stolen beer, then we're not authentically honoring my father."
At the time of his death, Harris was enrolled as a ninth-grade student at an alternative high school after he spent time in the Job Corps, a vocational training program administered by the Department of Labor, the Commercial Appeal reported. He was living with his grandmother at the time, but on the night of March 29, 2018, she allowed him to stay at his cousin's house and didn't think anything of it when Harris didn't come home, his grandmother Effie Fitch told the Commercial Appeal.
Numerous witnesses were in the store when Ghazali pulled the gun. None of them called 911 either, something Loverson said she had come to regret. In the hours and days after the shooting, Ghazali never reported it, and he never complained to police about any theft.
"He just left him out there to die," Fitch told the Commercial Appeal, "and I do believe in all my heart that if he had called the police and let somebody know that he shot somebody that my grandson would have been alive today."
Harris was shot in the left leg, and the bullet severed a major artery, Fowler said during the trial. A neighbor who lives four doors down from the convenience store told the jury that two days after the shooting, he noticed a trail of blood in his yard, WMC-TV reported. He followed it, and found Harris's body.
Throughout the trial, Ghazali's defense attorney argued that his client never intended to kill Harris, that it was just a "shot in the dark."
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh, the Commercial Appeal reported. He said Ghazali's behavior immediately after the shooting indicated that he didn't believe he could have killed the teen.
"Think about what you expected somebody to do after they have chased down and executed a person," Ballin said, according to video of the trial. "Would they go back to work?"
The jury deliberated for less than four hours on Thursday to reach a guilty verdict following the three-day trial.
Harris's father, Hanson Peete, who lives in Alabama, told WMC-TV in an interview that he was feeling "just lost."
"I'm lost that this murderer took my son away from me," he said. "Why did this happen to my son? Why was he left there like that, like he was nothing?"
Date: August 16th, 2019 11:02 AM Author: white frozen space rigpig
At the time of his death, Harris was enrolled as a ninth-grade student at an alternative high school after he spent time in the Job Corps, a vocational training program administered by the Department of Labor, the Commercial Appeal reported. He was living with his grandmother at the time, but on the night of March 29, 2018, she allowed him to stay at his cousin's house and didn't think anything of it when Harris didn't come home, his grandmother Effie Fitch told the Commercial Appeal.
Date: August 16th, 2019 11:02 AM Author: Salmon Pungent Casino
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
The attorney, Blake Ballin, argued that Ghazali was only firing warning shots, and that it was possible the clerk fired into the air and the bullet fell from the sky and struck Harris in the thigh,
Date: August 16th, 2019 11:15 AM Author: marvelous national
Really low IQ subthread. What else would you argue to suggest reasonable doubt? It's a Hail Mary argument but there's nothing else better. That's what defense attorneys do.
Date: August 16th, 2019 11:41 AM Author: marvelous national
sure, but very curious if there possibly could be a state that doesn't have a crime of petty theft. stealing a $2 beer would be a felony in some place?
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:19 PM Author: carnelian misanthropic bawdyhouse
Just saying that blowing someone away when they’re robbing a house you’re in at night is self defense. This dude chased down and shot a guy who stole a beer.
Date: August 16th, 2019 2:51 PM Author: rebellious voyeur shitlib
it's a crime that doesn't merit the death penalty in court, but it's one where death is definitely justifiable in the act. petty theft makes urban life unbearable and should create justification for those defending property that is theirs, or they are responsible for.
Date: August 17th, 2019 12:00 AM Author: orchid balding sanctuary feces
How is it not? Not premeditated so not FDM, but fired 3 shots at the guy, seems sufficient for SDM intent to me, or abandoned and malignant heart murder (firing into crowd).
What would they charge less than SDM? You’re saying snatching the beer = adequate provocation = manslaughter??
Date: August 16th, 2019 11:11 AM Author: jet university
Harris's father, Hanson Peete, who lives in Alabama, told WMC-TV in an interview that he was feeling "just lost."
"I'm lost that this murderer took my son away from me," he said. "Why did this happen to my son? Why was he left there like that, like he was nothing?"
Hmmm, some people might argue that a strong male figure in his life as a kid could have prevented him from finding himself in this situation. Maybe.
Welcome to America, where a 200 IQ brain filled with top knowledge in artificial intelligence has the same value as a 70 IQ one filled with arrogance and criminal inclinations.
Date: August 16th, 2019 11:23 AM Author: jet university
"Dear Memphis," wrote King, CEO of the King Center, "I'm here in your city. Dorian Harris should be here, too. If we don't value black lives and believe that Dorian's life is worth far more than an allegedly stolen beer, then we're not authentically honoring my father."
"allegedly"
Also, to perform this calculation we have to know what kind of beer it was. Was it OE 800 or Chimay, because Chimay can be pricey.
Date: August 16th, 2019 11:48 AM Author: vivacious ungodly hospital marketing idea
Prosecute the absent “father” and the “grandmother” for not giving a fuck about their “teen” doing whatever he wanted at night
“He was living with his grandmother at the time, but on the night of March 29, 2018, she allowed him to stay at his cousin's house and didn't think anything of it when Harris didn't come home, his grandmother Effie Fitch told the Commercial Appeal.”
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:14 PM Author: Swashbuckling Sepia Nibblets
If cities want an end to things like this, they need to show some semblance of willingness to help storeowners and other members of the community who are impacted by the crime they think we should let go.
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:20 PM Author: jet university
titcr. How many times do you think something like this happened to this storeowner before he snapped? Easily double digit times a week. I bet teens routinely go into his shop and steal things-- why not, he can't do anything about it. That is probably why this dude was so nonchalant about just taking a beer and walking out with it.
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:24 PM Author: Swashbuckling Sepia Nibblets
I like how the article couches it like his brazenness about doing it in plain sight was a point in his favor.
He calls the cops about this, they laugh at him and some shitlibs probably complain about his part in the school to prison pipeline. Does it even make sense to have security cameras?
He has literally no recourse for kids coming in and stealing things everyday. Cops could be waiting outside and the biggest repercussion for any thief is a boring afternoon. The arrest would probably drive away a few customers and be a net loss.
Libs have built an oppressive and unpredictable tax on any store ownership in a heavily minority area, while also complaining about food deserts and abandoned store fronts.
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:24 PM Author: Out-of-control Diverse Chapel
ljl, how far XO has fallen, even in first year LS u learn that shit like this isnt self defense, isnt justifiable... he literally ran after the nig and found him and shot him away from the store.. there is no fuking defense to that under really any situation.. even if the nig had punched the dood in the face and then ran out and the guy chased after him he still arguably doesnt have a legal right to blast him... this is actually pretty clear cut legally... u bitter KKK trolls just dont like niggas, i dont either, but i can at least call shit right despite that
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:26 PM Author: Swashbuckling Sepia Nibblets
I don't think anyone is questioning the legal decision. You also learn in first year LS that there are policy issues that may create problems. That's the issue here. As I note above, we now just expect that this guy has to lose as much money a day as locals want to steal from him? What's his recourse?
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:33 PM Author: propecia mathematica (✅)
he had no father figure, was a HS freshman at 17, and was robbing convenience stores in broad daylight. 0 chance he doesn't end up cycling between food stamps and jail for his entire adult life
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:34 PM Author: jet university
it likely isn't $2. This dude was probably robbed everyday he was open. Every day. And what can he do about it? Nothing really unless he moves his store, but he probably can't afford that. I am not saying he is in the right to shoot the guy, but he probably was finally pushed over the edge.
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:39 PM Author: Out-of-control Diverse Chapel
yes the law shld just assume every nig has stolen before, ever joo has committed tax fraud before, and every birdshit has blasted a kindergarten before.. sounds legit
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:41 PM Author: jet university
I am not saying that this dead guy robbed him before, just that I have no doubt that the storeowner has dealt with numerous teens stealing from him -- teens that looked like this beer guy.
Also, I am not even saying that the law should let the guy off. Just that this storeowner had no real recourse for people stealing from him every day.
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:44 PM Author: Out-of-control Diverse Chapel
so the law can consider past circumstances like that but it defintiely doesnt make up for his actions.. ur insane if u think this is justifiable homicide whne u run out of the store and fuking just blast some dude running away
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:31 PM Author: jet university
Not only is he supposed to lose money, but it is racist that more -- and higher quality stores aren't set up in the ghetto. Also, don't try to protect yourself:
Date: August 16th, 2019 12:38 PM Author: Out-of-control Diverse Chapel
lol so u change the law to say if a store clerk suspects a nigga stole $2 in beer he has a LEGAL RIGHT to run out of the store, chase the nigga down, fire at him with his gun and then walk back to the store and process customers again as if nothing happened?
"Dear Memphis," wrote King, CEO of the King Center, "I'm here in your city. Dorian Harris should be here, too. If we don't value black lives and believe that Dorian's life is worth far more than an allegedly stolen beer, then we're not authentically honoring my father."
Date: August 16th, 2019 2:28 PM Author: Territorial sinister business firm messiness
Actually, a store clerk hunted an escaping thief for several blocks like an animal, shot him with intent to maim or kill, then returned back to his store and casually told the other blacks milling about "I think I shot him." No one did anything.
Sec. 9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Sec. 9.43. PROTECTION OF THIRD PERSON'S PROPERTY. A person is justified in using force or deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property of a third person if, under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under Section 9.41 or 9.42 in using force or deadly force to protect his own land or property and:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the unlawful interference constitutes attempted or consummated theft of or criminal mischief to the tangible, movable property; or
(2) the actor reasonably believes that:
(A) the third person has requested his protection of the land or property;
(B) he has a legal duty to protect the third person's land or property; or
(C) the third person whose land or property he uses force or deadly force to protect is the actor's spouse, parent, or child, resides with the actor, or is under the actor's care.
Acts 1973, 63rd Leg., p. 883, ch. 399, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1974. Amended by Acts 1993, 73rd Leg., ch. 900, Sec. 1.01, eff. Sept. 1, 1994.
Date: August 17th, 2019 12:30 AM Author: Out-of-control Diverse Chapel
Lol 1. The big probably wasn't even on Arabs property by time was shot 2. Don't know if he even recovered the fucking beer, doubtful since he wasn't even sure wat happened to Darnell